Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae
et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca

Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2006; 73(4):237-242 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2006/034

Acute Musculoskeletal Infection: Comparison of Different Methods for Intraoperative Bacterial IdentificationOriginal papers

CH. BAHRS^1,*, M. MARSCHAL², K. WEISE¹, E. LINGENFELTER³, K. DIETZ⁴, P. HEEG², CH. EINGARTNER¹

¹ BG Trauma Center, University of Tuebingen, Germany

² Institute of Medicl Microbiology and Hygiene, University of Tuebingen, Germany

³ Northland Bone and Joint Institute, Kansas City, USA

⁴ Department of Medical Biometry, University of Tuebingen, Germany

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:
Various techniques are used for detection of pathogens in musculoskeletal infection. These methods differ with respect to reliability and ease of handling. A prospective study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of three intraoperative techniques.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:
In 20 cases (18 patients) with clinically confirmed acute musculoskeletal infections, intraoperative collected swab samples, tissue samples and fluid samples injected into standard blood culture vials were used for microbiological diagnosis. Identification of bacteria, time necessary for detection and ease of handling during surgery was evaluated.

RESULTS:
In 19 cases bacterial growth was demonstrated using either intraoperative swabs or blood culture technique (95% sensitivity),whereas 18 tissue biopsies were positive (90% sensitivity. 27 bacterial species were isolated. In 18 instances for the swab technique, 14 instances for the tissue biopsy and 4 operations for the blood culture vials, ease of handling was rated as excellent.

DISCUSSION:
The study demonstrated differences between the three tested methods with respect to ease of handling. With respect to the number of detected organisms and time for their detection there are no significant differences. These last findings are in contrast to of the results of other authors. The reason for this could be that during operative dissection an accurate and specific collection of specimens from the acute deep infected soft tissues and bones independent from the type of surgical procedure is possible. Therefore, even with the swab method a high amount of microorganisms can be recovered. Especially for intraarticular infections, fluid samples injected into standard blood vials is a practical method for the surgeon. In acute musculoskeletal infections other than joint infections, there is less benefit for the blood culture vials.

CONCLUSION:
Intraoperative swab technique yields valid results comparable to other techniques and is an accurate technique for detection of pathogens from acute musculoskeletal infections.

Keywords: implant, infections, bacteriological techniques, comparative study

Accepted: May 3, 2006; Published: August 1, 2006  Show citation