Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009; 76(4):276-280 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2009/051

Experiences with the Two Incision Minimal Invasive Hip Replacement in 150 Cases with a Proximally Hydroxyapatite Coated ImplantOriginal papers

D. WOHLRAB1,*, N. SOTEREANOS2
1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
2 Allegheny General Hospital, West Penn Allegheny Health System, Division of Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, Pittsburgh, PA (U.S.A)

BACKGROUND:
In this retrospective study we describe our experiences in minimally invasive two incision total hip replacement (THR).

METHODS:
We performed 150 fluoroscopy-assisted two incision minimally invasive THR on 148 patients using a proximally coated hydroxyapatite implant. Clinical (Harris Hip Score (HHS), surgical time, blood loss, length of hospital stay) and radiographic data (leg length discrepancy, cup abduction angle, stem alignment) were collected.

RESULTS:
The HHS increased from 54.7 preoperatively to 92.6 postoperatively. Mean surgical time was 103 minutes. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 410 ml. There were 11 (7.3%) complications including two dislocations (1.3%), one deep wound infection (0.7%), three minor calcar fractures (2.0 %), one periprosthetic femur fracture (0.7 %), two subsided stems (1.3%) and two femoral nerve palsies (1.3%). One of the femoral nerve palsies remained unresolved. The prevent femoral nerve palsies we used somato-sensory evoked potentials (SSEP) after the 48th case and there were no further nerve palsies. Ten complications were in the first 48 cases. In the first 28 cases the anterior skin incision was parallel to the femoral neck and then changed to parallel the intertrochanteric line. Mean length of stay was 2.2 days. Mean cup abduction angle was 39.4° and mean cup anteversion was 34.6°.

CONCLUSION:
The initial complication rate can be related to the learning curve using a new surgical technique. In the subsequent 102 surgeries there was one stem subsidence.
The minimally invasive approach in THA remains new technique and carries additional risks. Secondary to the learning curve comparable short and long term follow up's are necessary.

Keywords: minimal invasive, total hip arthroplasty, two incision technique, cementless THR

Published: August 1, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
WOHLRAB D, SOTEREANOS N. Experiences with the Two Incision Minimal Invasive Hip Replacement in 150 Cases with a Proximally Hydroxyapatite Coated Implant. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009;76(4):276-280. doi: 10.55095/achot2009/051. PubMed PMID: 19755050.
Download citation

References

  1. ARCHIBECK, M. J., WHITE, R. E., JR.: Learning curve for the two-incision total hip replacement. Clin. Orthop., 429: 232-238, 2004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. BERGER, R. A.: Mini-incision total hip replacement using an anterolateral approach: technique and results. Orthop. Clin. N. Amer., 35: 143-151, 2004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. BERGER, R. A., DUWELIUS, P. J.: The two-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: technique and results. Orthop. Clin. N. Amer., 35:163-172, 2004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. BERGER, R. A., JACOBS, J. J., MENEGHINI, R. M., DELLA, V. C., PAPROSKY, W., ROSENBERG, A. G.: Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop., 429: 239-247, 2004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. BERTIN, K. C., ROTTINGER, H.: Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin. Orthop., 429: 248-255, 2004. Go to original source...
  6. CHUNG, W. K., LIU, D., FOO, L. S.: Mini-incision total hip replacement-surgical technique and early results. J. Orthop. Surg. (Hong. Kong.) , 12: 19-24, 2004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. DIGIOIA, A. M., III, PLAKSEYCHUK, A. Y., LEVISON, T. J., JARAMAZ, B.: Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty, with navigation. J. Arthroplasty, 18: 123-128, 2003. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. DORR, L. D.: The appeal of the mini-incision. Orthopedics, 27: 937-938, 2004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. GOLDSTEIN, W. M., BRANSON, J. J., BERLAND, K. A., GORDON, A. C.: Minimal-incision total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Jt Surg., 85-A Suppl 4:33-38, 2003. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. HAGEL, A., HEIN, W., WOHLRAB, D.: Experience with the Mayo® Conservative Hip System. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 75: 288-292, 2008. Go to original source...
  11. HARRIS, W. H.: Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J. Bone Jt Surg., 51-A: 737-755, 1969. Go to original source...
  12. HIGUCHI, F., GOTOH, M., YAMAGUCHI, N., SUZUKI, R., KUNOU, Y., OOISHI, K., NAGATA, K.: Minimally invasive uncemented total hip arthroplasty through an anterolateral approach with a shorter skin incision. J. Orthop. Sci., 8: 812-817, 2003. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. HOWELL, J. R., MASRI, B. A., DUNCAN, C. P.: Minimally invasive versus standard incision anterolateral hip replacement: a comparative study. Orthop. Clin. N. Amer., 35: 153-162, 2004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. IRVING, J. F.: Direct two-incision total hip replacement without fluoroscopy. Orthop. Clin. N. Amer., 35: 173-181, 2004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. NAKAMURA, S., MATSUDA, K., ARAI, N., WAKIMOTO, N., MATSUSHITA, T.: Mini-incision posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Int. Orthop., 2004. Go to original source...
  16. RITTMEISTER, M., KONIG, D. P., EYSEL, P., KERSCHBAUMER, F.: Minimal-invasive Zugänge zum Hüft- und Kniegelenk bei künstlichem Gelenkersatz. Orthopäde, 33: 1229-1235, 2004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. SOTEREANOS, N. G., MILLER, M., SMITH, B., WOHLRAB, D., HUBE, R., SEWECKE, J. J.: Utilizing Intra-Operative Pelvic Landmarks for Acetabular Component Placement in Total Hip Arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty, 2005. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. STEHÍK, J., MUSIL, D., HELD, M., STÁREK, M.: Minimally Invasive Total Hip Replacement - one year results. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 75: 262-270, 2008. Go to original source...
  19. STULBERG, S. D.: The rationale for using computer navigation with minimally invasive THA. Orthopedics, 27: 942, 946, 2004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. TIMM, S.: Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: what is it all about? J. Contin. Educ. Nurs., 35: 246-247, 2004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. WENZ, J. F., GURKAN, I., JIBODH, S. R.: Mini-incision total hip arthroplasty: a comparative assessment of perioperative outcomes. Orthopedics, 25: 1031-1043, 2002. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. WIDMER, K. H.: A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. J. Arthroplasty, 19: 387-390, 2004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. WOHLRAB, D., HAGEL, A., AND HEIN, W.: Vorteile der minimalinvasiven Implantation von Hüfttotalendoprothesen in der frühen postoperativen Rehabilitationsphase. Z. Orthop, 142: 685-690, 2004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. WOOLSON, S. T., MOW, C. S., SYQUIA, J. F., LANNIN, J. V., SCHURMAN, D. J.: Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J. Bone Jt Surg., 86-A: 1353-1358, 2004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...