Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009; 76(6):451-455 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2009/084

Výsledky léčení subtrochanterických zlomenin femuru pomocí AO/ASIF Long Trochanteric Fixation Nail (LTFN)Původní práce

E. MUÑOZ-MAHAMUD*, G. BORI, J. CUÑÉ, L. FONT, A. DOMINGO, S. SUSO
Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:
This retrospective study reports on the clinical results of a group of 23 patients with subtrochanteric femoral fractures using the Long Trochanteric Fixation Nail (LTFN).

MATERIAL:
Between January 2005 and January 2008, 23 patients (20 women, 3 men; average age: 64.8 years old) with subtrochanteric femoral fractures were treated surgically. According to the AO/ASIF Classification, the most frequent fracture type was an 32-A1. They were also classified regarding the Seinsheimer Classification, in which the commonest type was the IIB. Of the 23 fractures, 14 of them had been the result of an unexpected fall, 2 were the result of a high-energy trauma and 7 consisted of pathologic fractures.

METHODS:
All the patients were treated using the LTFN device and they all received clinical and radiological follow-ups at least until their fractures were consolidated. The average surgery time, average decrease in haemoglobin in the first 24 hours post-surgery, average need for red blood cell transfusion, postoperative mortality at a 6th month follow-up, time to autonomous deambulation, most frequent destination at the time of discharge, average time for consolidation of the fracture and average follow-up time were reported. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were also recorded.

RESULTS:
The average surgery time from cut to stitch was 97.45 minutes with the decrease in haemoglobin averaging 26.45 g/L and, on average, the need for red blood cell transfusion was 1.12 concentrates. In the first postoperative week, 57.1% of the total number patients were capable of deambulation. The time to hospital discharge was 12.9 days. After an average follow-up of 13.9 months, total weightbearing was achieved in the 64.7% of the patients. The average consolidation time was 21.6 weeks and none of the patients developed pseudoarthrosis. Technical failures were seen in 4.3% of the cases: 1 patient suffered a migration of the distal locking screw. There were no cases of deep infection, cut-out, bending/breaking of the implant, malrotation or fracture of the femoral shaft at the tip of the implant.

DISCUSSION:
From a mechanical point of view the use of a long intramedullary nail in combination with a blade or a screw seems to be the most appropriate treatment for subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. Despite the improvement of implants and surgical techniques, failures due to complications are still considerable. The low distal shaft diameter of the LTFN, in combination with an extremely precise positioning of the blade in the middle of the femoral head, can prevent mechanical complications. Open reduction and cerclage cabling may be required so as to obtain a correct alignment of the fracture.
CONCLUSSION
We conclude that the LTFN is a safe and reliable intramedullary device for the treatment of subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. Deambulation within the first postoperative surgery is possible when positioned properly. Its implantation requires more surgical time than the standard nails.

Klíčová slova: subtrochanteric fractures, femur, Long Trochanteric Fixation Nail (LTFN)

Zveřejněno: 1. prosinec 2009  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
MUÑOZ-MAHAMUD E, BORI G, CUÑÉ J, FONT L, DOMINGO A, SUSO S. Výsledky léčení subtrochanterických zlomenin femuru pomocí AO/ASIF Long Trochanteric Fixation Nail (LTFN). Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2009;76(6):451-455. doi: 10.55095/achot2009/084. PubMed PMID: 20067691.
Stáhnout citaci

Reference

  1. AL-YASSARI, G., LANGSTAFF, R. J., JONES, J. W. M., AL-LAMI, M.: The AO/ASIF Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) for the treatment of unstable trochanteric femoral fracture. Injury, 33: 395-399, 2002. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  2. ALVAREZ, J. R., CASTELEIRO, R., ARANDA, R. L., BLANCO, M. F., DEHESA, M. C.: Indications for use of the Long Gamma Nail. Clin. Orthop., 350: 62-66, 1998. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  3. BAUMGAERTNER, M. R., CURTIN, S. L., LINDSKOG, D. M.: Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures. Clin. Orthop., 348: 87-94, 1998. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  4. BOYD, H. B., ANDERSON, L. D.: Management of unstable trochanteric fractures. Surg. Gynec. Obstet., 112: 633-638, 1961.
  5. CACERES, E., LEON, L., MESTRE, C., MARQUES, F., BALLESTER, J., MESTRE, C.: Estudio prospectivo comparativo entre el clavo Gamma trocantérico y el clavo femoral proximal AO (PFN) en el tratamiento de las facturas trocantéricas inestables. Rev. Ortop. Traum., 49: 11-16, 2005. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  6. DOUSA, P., BARTONÍCEK, J., JEHLICKA, D., SKÁLA-ROSENBAUM, J.: Osteosynthesis of trochanteric fractures using proximal femoral nails. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 69: 22-30, 2002.
  7. FIELDING, J. W., MAGLIATO, H. J.: Subtrochanteric fractures. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. Surg., Gynec. and Obstet., 122: 555-560, 1966.
  8. FRIEDL, W., CLAUSEN, J.: Experimental examination for optimized stabilisation of trochanteric femur fractures, intra- or extramedullary implant localisation and influence of femur neck component profile on cut-out risk. Chirurg, 72: 1344-1352, 2001.
  9. FRITZ, T., HIERSEMANN, K., KRIEGLSTEIN, C., FRIEDL, W.: Prospective randomized comparison of gliding nail and gamma nail in the therapy of trochanteric fractures. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg., 119: 1-6, 1999. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  10. GARDNER, M. J., BRIGGS, S. M., KOPJAR, B., HELFET, D. L., LORICH, D. G.: Radiographic outcomes of intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with the Trochanteric Fixation Nail. Injury, 38: 1189-1196, 2007. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  11. HANDOLL, H. H. G., SHERRINGTON, C., PARKER, M. J.: Mobilisation strategies after hip fracture surgery in adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 2004;CD001704. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  12. HOHAUS, T., BULA, P., BONNAIRE, F.: Intramedullary osteosynthesis in the treatment of lower extremity fractures. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 75: 52-60, 2008. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  13. KUKLA, C., HEINZ, T., GAEBLER, C., HEINZE, G., VÉCSEI, V.: The standard Gamma Nail: a critical analysis of 1000 cases. J. Trauma, 51: 77-83, 2001. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  14. LENICH, A., FIERLBECK, J., AL-MUNAJJED, A., DENDORFER, S., MAI, R., FÜCHTMEIER, B., MAYR, E., HAMMER, J.: First clinical and biomechanical results of the Trochanteric Fixation Nail (TFN). Technol. Health Care, 14: 403-409, 2006. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  15. LENICH, A., MAYR, E., RÜTER, A., MÖCKL, C., FÜCHTMEIER, B.: First results with the Trochanter Fixation Nail (TFN): a report on 120 cases. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg., 126: 706-712, 2006. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  16. MÜLLER, M. E., NAZARIAN, S.: Classification of fractures of the femur and its use in the AO index. Rev. Chir. Orthop., Reparatrice Appar. Mot., 67: 297-309, 1981.
  17. PAKUTS, A. J.: Unstable subtrochanteric fractures: Gamma Nail versus Dynamic Condylar Screw. Int. Orthop., 28: 21-24, 2004. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  18. PARKER, M. J., HANDOLL, H. H. J.: Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 2005:CD000093. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  19. PAVELKA, T., HOUCEK, P., LINHART, M., MATEJKA, J.: Osteosynthesis of hip and femoral shaft fractures using the PFN-long. Acta Chir. orthop., Traum. čech., 74: 91-98, 2007. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  20. RAMAKRISHNAN, M., PRASAD, S. S., PARKINSON, R. W., KAYE, J. C.: Management of subtrochanteric femoral fractures and metastases using Long Proximal Femoral Nail. Injury, 35: 184-190, 2004. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  21. SCHÜRCH, M. A., RIZZOLI, R., MERMILLOD, B., VASEY, H., MICHEL, J. P., BONJOUR, J. P.: A prospective study on socioeconomic aspects of fracture of the proximal femur. J. Bone Miner. Res., 11: 1935-1942, 1996. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  22. SEINSHEIMER, F.: Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. J. Bone Jt Surg., 60-A: 300-306, 1978. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  23. SIMMERMACHER, R. K., BOSCH, A. M., VAN DER WERKEN, C.: The AO/ASIF-Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN): a new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Injury, 30: 327-332, 1999. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  24. SKLÁDAL, M., PINK, M., LISÝ, M., NOVOTNÝ, L.: Treatment of trochanteric fractures by percutaneous compression plate. Acta Chir. orthop., Traum. čech., 76: 202-207, 2009. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  25. WATSON, H. K., CAMPBELL, R. D. J., WADE, P. A.: Classification, treatment and complications of the adult subtrochanteric fracture. J. Trauma, 4: 457-480, 1964. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  26. WAGNER, S., RÜTER, A.: Per- and subtrochanteric femur fractures. Unfallchirurg, 102: 206-222, 1999. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  27. WERNER-TUTSCHKU, W., LAJTAI, G., SCHMIEDHUBER, G., LANG, T., PIRKL, C., ORTHNER, E.: Intra- and perioperative complications in the stabilization of per- and subtrochanteric femoral fractures by means of PFN. Unfallchirurg, 105: 881-885, 2002. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...