Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2010; 77(1):24-31 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2010/004

Our Experience with AES Total Ankle ReplacementOriginal papers

S. POPELKA*, P. VAVŘÍK, I. LANDOR, J. HACH, J. PECH, A. SOSNA
I. ortopedická klinika 1. LF UK, FN Motol, Praha

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:
The method of choice for the treatment of severe ankle arthritis is either arthrodesis or joint arthroplasty. Each has its advantages and disadvantages. Arthrodesis is the definitive therapy for severe ankle destruction and instability. Joint arthroplasty has an advantage in maintaining ankle mobility. However, its range of indications and its reliability and durability are more limited. The aim of this study is to present our experience with the AES prosthesis and draw attention to some drawbacks of this surgical treatment.

MATERIAL:
From September 2003 till June 2008, 51 AES ankle replacements were carried out in 51 patients (33 women and 18 men). Their average age at the time of surgery was 53.8 years. The youngest patient was 23 and the oldest was 88 years old. The indication for surgery was rheumatoid arthritis in 10, primary arthritis in six and post-traumatic ankle arthritis in 35 patients.

METHODS:
The patients were evaluated in 2008. The follow-up ranged from 4 months to 5 years. The patients were examined for ankle joint mobility and pain. Radiographs were assessed for potential signs of component loosening.

RESULTS:
The results presented here are short-term ones. The pre-operative AOFAS score of 33.7 increased to 82.3 points post-operatively. The range of motion was on average 20 degrees of plantar flexion and 5 to10 degrees of dorsiflexion. Thirty-five patients (68.7 %) were free from pain, 11 (21.5 %) experienced slight pain while walking, and five (9.8 %) patients reported more intensive pain in the joint treated.
Intra-operative complications included a fracture of the medial malleolus in two (3.9 %) patients subsequently treated with screw osteosynthesis. Post-operatively, seven (13.7 %) patients experienced slow healing of the operative wound. One patient had dislocation of the polyethylene liner at 3 months after surgery.
Revision surgery was carried out in seven (13.7 %) patients. Two patients suffering from increasing pain around medial malleolus underwent revision and removal of ossifications. One patient developed necrosis of the talus at 1 year after surgery. She underwent extraction of the prosthesis and ankle arthrodesis with a retrograde locking nail inserted through the heel. A large bony effect arising due to extraction of the necrotic talus was repaired using bone graft.
Three (5.8 %) patients developed post-operative instability of the ankle that required revision surgery. The radiographs of another three (5.8 %) patients showed bone cysts and signs of tibial component loosening. Of these, one patient underwent surgical revision with replacement of the polyethylene liner. Cavities were freed from granuloma induced by polyethylene wear debris, and filled with bone graft from the iliac crest.

DISCUSSION:
Total ankle replacement is a complicated surgical procedure that may results in various technical difficulties and complications. These are inversely proportional to the surgeon's experience, as also shown by literature data.

CONCLUSIONS:
The longevity of a total ankle replacement depends, much more than in other joint replacements, on an accurate implantation technique and correct indication.

Keywords: total ankle replacement, rheumatoid arthritis, arthritis of the ankle, polyethylene wear, complications

Published: February 1, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
POPELKA S, VAVŘÍK P, LANDOR I, HACH J, PECH J, SOSNA A. Our Experience with AES Total Ankle Replacement. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2010;77(1):24-31. doi: 10.55095/achot2010/004. PubMed PMID: 20214857.
Download citation

References

  1. ANDERSON, T., MONTGOMERY, F., CARLSON, A.: Uncemented STAR total ankle prostheses. Three to eight-year follow-up of 51 consecutive ankles. J. Bone Jt Surg., 85-A: 1321-1329, 2003. Go to original source...
  2. BEK, J., VAVŘÍK, P., LANDOR, I.: Hodnocení přežití náhrady kolenního kloubu Walter-Motorlet - dlouhodobé výsledky. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum., čech., 72: 221-227, 2005.
  3. BENEDETTI, M. G., LEARDINI, A., ROMAGNOLI, M., BERTI, L., CATANI, F., GIANNINI, S.: Functional outcome of menisceal-bearing total ankle replacement - A gait analysis study. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 98: 19-26, 2008. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. BOLTON-MAGGS, B. G., SUDLOW, R. A., FREEMAN, M. A. R: Total ankle arthroplasty: A long-term review of the London hospital experience. J. Bone Jt Surg., 67-B: 785-790, 1985. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. BUECHEL, Sr, J., BUECHEL, Jr, J., PAPPAS, M.: Twenty-year evaluation of cementless mobile-bearing total ankle replacements. Clin. Orthop., 424: 19-26, 2004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. ČECH, O., DŽUPA, V.: The European School of Total Hip Arthroplasty and 35 Years of Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Czech Republic. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum, čech., 72: 57-76, 2005.
  7. DI DOMENICO, L. A., LAWRENCE, A., WILLIAMS, K.: Revisional total ankle arthroplasty becouse of a large tibial bone cyst. Foot and Ankle Surgery, 47: 453-456, 2008. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. DOETS, H. C., VAN DER PLAAT, L. W., KLEIN, J. P.: Medial malleolar osteotomy for the correction of varus deformity during total ankle arthroplasty: results in 15 ankles. Foot and Ankle International, 29: 171-177, 2008. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. DUNGL, P. a kolektiv: Ortopedie. Praha, Grada 2005.
  10. GALLO, J., LANDOR, I., VAVŘÍK, P.,: Současné možnosti prevence infekcí kloubních náhrad. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 73: 229-236, 2006. Go to original source...
  11. HENRICSON, A., AGREN, P.H.: Secondary surgery after total ankle replacement. The influence of preoperative hindfoot aligment. Foot and Ankle Surg., 13: 41-44, 2007. Go to original source...
  12. HINTERMANN, B., VALDERRABANO, V., DEREKMAEKER, G., DICK, W.: The HINTEGRA ankle. Rationale and short-term results of 122 consecutive ankles. Clin. Orthop., 424: 57-68, 2004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. HRUBINA, M., BĚHOUNEK, J., SKOTÁK, M.: Střednědobé výsledky necementované jamky TEP kyčelního kloubu Ultima u primoimplantací. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 75: 205-211, 2008. Go to original source...
  14. JAHODA, D., NYČ, O., POKORNÝ, D., LANDOR, I., SOSNA, A.: Antibiotika v prevenci infekčních komplikací u operací kloubních náhrad. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 73: 108-114, 2006. Go to original source...
  15. JAHODA, D., NYČ, O., ŠIMŠA, J., KUČERA, E., HANEK, P., CHRZ, P., POKORNÝ, D., TAWA, N., LANDOR, I., SOSNA, A.: Pozdní hematogenní infekce kloubních náhrad. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 75: 88-92, 2008. Go to original source...
  16. KITAOKA, H. B., PATZER, G. L.: Clinical results of Mayo total ankle arthroplasty. J. Bone Jt Surg., 78-A: 1658-1664, 1996. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. KITAOKA, H. B., ALEXANDER, I. L., ADELAAR, R. S., NUNLEY, J. A., MYERSON, M. S.: Clinical Raiting Systems for the Ankle, Hindfoot, Midfoot, Hallux and Lesser Toe. Foot and Ankle Int., 15: 349-353, 1994. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. KNECHT, S. I., ESTIN, M., CALLAGHAN, J. J., ZIMMERMANN, M. B., ALLIMAN, K. J., ALBINE, F. G., SALTZMAN, C. L.: The Agility total ankle arthroplasty - Seven to sixteen-years follow up. J. Bone Jt Surg., 86-A: 1161-1171, 2004. Go to original source...
  19. KOFOED, H., LUNDBERG-JENSEN, A.: Ankle arthroplasty in patiens younger and older than 50 years: a prospective series with long-term follow-up. Foot Ankle Int., 20: 501-506, 1999. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. KOFOED, H., STÜRUP, J.: Comparison of ankle arthroplasty and arthrodesis. A prospective series with long-term follow-up. The Foot, 4: 6-9, 1994. Go to original source...
  21. KOFOED, H., DANBORG, L.: Biological fixation of ankle arthroplasty. The Foot, 5: 27-31, 1995. Go to original source...
  22. KOFOED, H.: Scandinavian total ankle replacement (STAR) Clin. Orthop., 424: 73-79, 2004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. KUMAR, A., DHAR, S.: Total ankle replacement: early results during learning period. Foot and Ankle surgery, 13: 19-23, 2007. Go to original source...
  24. KURUP, H. V., TAILOR, G. R.: Medial impingement after ankle replacement. International Orthopaedics, 32: 243-246, 2008. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Mc GARVEY, W. C., CLANTON, T. O., LUNZ, D.: Malleolar fracture after ankle arthroplasty. A comparison of designs. Clin. Orthop., 424: 104-410, 2004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. PETRUŠKA, J., ĎURČANSKÝ, D., MAKAREVIČ, A., KUBOVIČOVÁ, E., PIVKO, J.: Morfologicko-funkčná charakteristika periartikulárneho tkaniva po endoprotéze bedrového klbu: histologické, cytochemické a elektrónmikroskopické aspekty. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 75: 375-381, 2008. Go to original source...
  27. PIRIOU, P., CULPAN, P., MULLINS, M., CARDON, J. N., POZZI, D., JUDET, T.: Ankle replacement versus arthrodesis: A comparative gait analysis study. Foot and Ankle International, 29: 3-9, 2008. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. POKORNÝ, D., ŠLOUF, M., HORÁK, Z., JAHODA, D., ENTLICHER, G., EKLOVÁ, S., SOSNA, A.: Metodika sledování distribuce otěrových částic UHMWPE v okolních tkáních u TEP kyčelního kloubu. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 73: 243-250, 2006. Go to original source...
  29. POPELKA, S., VAVŘÍK, P.: Revmatochirurgie nohy a hlezna. Studia Geo 2005.
  30. SCHONHERR, R., FUSS, S., KORBL, M., TREPTE, C. T., PARSCH, D.: Short-term results after STAR total ankle replacement. Orthopäde, 37: 783-787, 2008. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. SCHUTTLE, B. G., LOUWERENS, J. W. K: Short-term results of our first 49 Scandinavian total ankle replacements (STAR). Foot and Ankle International, 29: 124-127, 2008. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. SOSNA, A., ČECH, O., KRBEC, M.: Operační přístupy ke skeletu končetin, pánve a páteře. Triton 2005.
  33. SOSNA, A., ČECH, O., SOSNA, T.: Operační přístupy ke skeletu bérce. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 43: 299-314, 1976.
  34. THOMASON, K., EYRES, K. S.: A technique of fusion for failed total replacement of the ankle - Tibio-allograft-calcaneal fusion with locked retrograde intramedullary nail. J. Bone Jt Surg., 90-B: 885-888, 2008. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. VESELÝ, R., PROCHÁZKA, V., VIŠŇA, P., VALENTOVÁ, J., ŠAVOLT, J.: Tibiotalokalkaneální artrodéza retrográdním hřebem jištěným v rovině sagitální. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 75: 129-133, 2008. Go to original source...
  36. WOOD, P. L. R., TIMOTHY, M. C., SMITH, R.: The present state of Ankle arthroplasty. Foot and Ankle Surgery, 14: 115-119, 2008. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  37. WOOD, P. L. R., PREM, H., SUTTON, C.: Total ankle replacement - Medium-term results in 200 Scandinavian total ankle replacements. J. Bone Jt Surg., 90-B: 605-609, 2008. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...