Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2011; 78(4):314-320 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2011/048

Comparison of Functional Outcomes in Angle-Stable Osteosynthesis of Comminuted Fractures of the Proximal Humerus with Those in Percutaneous Kirschner-Wire Fixation. A Prospective Study of Mid-Term ResultsOriginal papers

K. EDELMANN1,4,*, P. OBRUBA1,4, L. KOPP1,4, J. CIHLÁŘ2, A. M. ČELKO3
1 Traumacentrum, Masarykova nemocnice Ústí nad Labem
2 Katedra matematiky přírodovědecké fakulty UJEP, Ústí nad Labem
3 Ústav epidemiologie 3. LF UK, Praha
4 Postgraduální studium 3. LF UK, Praha

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:
To evaluate the mid-term results in a group of patients with displaced comminuted (three- and four-fragment) fractures of the proximal humerus treated by angle-stable plate osteosynthesis and compare them with the results in the patients in whom the method of percutaneous Kirschner-wire (K-wire) fixation was used.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:
The group treated with angle-stable implants (ASI group) consisted of 55 patients, 13 men and 42 women. A Targon Ph nail was used in 32 and a Philos plate in 23 patients. These patients were compared with a group of nine patients, one man and eight women, treated by percutaneous K-wire fixation (K-wire group). At a follow-up of 12 months at least, final Constant (CS) and DASH scores were assessed. The CS was related to the values for the unaffected limb, and an individual relative CS was calculated and expressed in percent. The mean follow-up was 30 (range, 13-55) months in the ASI group and 58 (range, 39-76) months in the K-wire group. The following seven characteristics were evaluated : fracture type, surgical technique, dominance of the affected limb, patient age, injury-surgery interval, and individual relative CS and DASH scores. The results were statistically analysed with a 5% level of statistical significance set for all tests.

RESULTS:
The average age in the ASI group was 62.1 years, with 64.7 (range, 29-95) years for women and 35.5 (range, 26-76) years for men. In the K-wire group the average age was 66.1 (range, 53-84) years. The functional outcomes in four-fragment fractures were significantly worse than in three-fragment fractures (mean relative CS and DASH scores of 56 and 21 versus 72 and 32). The K-wire group showed a significantly worse functional outcomes than the ASI group in both the mean relative CS score (p<0.001) and the mean DASH score (p=0.003). No significant relationship was found in any other pair of variables. The patient's age had no effect on functional outcome, as assessed by CS (p=0.412) and DASH (p=0.076) and the injury-surgery interval had no influence, either (CS, p=0.220; DASH, p=0.118). There was no relation between the patient's age and choice of the surgical method (p=0.467), between the patient's age and a fracture type (p=0.356) and between the patient's age and injury to either a dominant or a non-dominant limb (p=0.659). Dominance or non-dominance of the affected limb had no effect on CS or DASH scores (p=0.662 and p=0.302, respectively) or on a type of fracture (p=0.183).

DISCUSSION:
Several surgical techniques used for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures suggest the absence of consensus in therapy. Novel angle-stable implants show better biochemical properties and meet criteria required in minimally invasive techniques. Some authors prefer intramedullary nailing for three-fragment fractures and the use of an angle-stable plate for four-fragment fractures. These indication criteria were also confirmed by the results of our study.

CONCLUSIONS:
The analysis of functional outcomes showed that the therapeutic effect of K-wire transfixation was significantly worse than the effect of the angle-stable plate technique, and therefore the authors stopped using this method. At present intramedullary nailing is indicated in two- and three-fragment fractures and in some less displaced four-fragment fractures. An angle-stable plate is used in severely displaced four-fragment fractures. If the head is broken or dislocated, older patients are primarily indicated for hemiarthroplasty and younger ones for humeral head reconstruction.

Keywords: proximal humerus fracture, angular stable implants, percutaneous fixation

Published: August 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
EDELMANN K, OBRUBA P, KOPP L, CIHLÁŘ J, ČELKO AM. Comparison of Functional Outcomes in Angle-Stable Osteosynthesis of Comminuted Fractures of the Proximal Humerus with Those in Percutaneous Kirschner-Wire Fixation. A Prospective Study of Mid-Term Results. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2011;78(4):314-320. doi: 10.55095/achot2011/048. PubMed PMID: 21888841.
Download citation

References

  1. BABST, R., BRUNNER, F.: Plating in proximal humeral fractures. Eur. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg., 33: 345-356, 2007. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. BARTONÍČEK, J., DŽUPA, V., FRIČ, V., PACOVSKÝ, V., SKÁLA-ROSENBAUM, J., SVATOŠ, F.: Epidemiologie a ekonomie zlomenin proximálního femuru, proximálního humeru, distálního radia a luxačních zlomenin hlezna. Rozhl. Chir., 87: 213-219, 2008.
  3. CONSTANT, C. R., MURLEY A. H.: A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin. Orthop., 216: 91-110, 1987. Go to original source...
  4. COURT-BROWN, C. M., CATTERMOLE, H., McQUEEN, M. M.: Impacted valgus fractures (B1.1) of the proximal humerus. The results of non-operative treatment. J. Bone Jt Surg., 84-B: 504-508, 2002. Go to original source...
  5. COURT-BROWN, C. M., GARG, A., McQUEEN, M. M.: The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop. Scand., 72: 365-371, 2001. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. ČELKO, A. M.: Epidemiologie úrazů v České republice. Postrgaduální medicína, 6: 400-404, 2004.
  7. EISELE, R., KINZL, L.: Nailing of articular and extraarticular fractures of the head of the humerus. Osteo Trauma Care, 10: 1-4, 2002. Go to original source...
  8. FENICHEL, I., ORAN, A., BURSTEIN, G., PERRY, P. M.: Percutaneous pinning using threaded pins as a treatment option for unstable two- and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus: a retrospective study. Int. Orthop., 30: 153-7, 2006. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. FIALKA, C., OBERLEITNER, G., STAMPFL, P., BRANNATH, W., HEXEL, M., VÉCSEI, V.: Modification of the Constant-Murley shoulder score-introduction of the individual relative Constant score. Individual shoulder assessment. Injury, 36: 1159-65, 2005. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. FRANGEN, T. M., MÜLLER, E. J., DUDDA, M., ARENS, S., MUHR, G., KÄLICKE, T.: Proximal humeral fractures in geriatric patients. Is the angle-stable plate osteosynthesis really a breakthrough? Acta Orthop. Belg., 73: 571-9, 2007.
  11. GRADL, G., DIETZE, A., KÄÄB, M., HOPFENMÜLLER, W., MITTLMEIER, T.: Is Locking Nailing of Humeral Head Fractures Superior to Locking Plate Fixation? Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 467: 2986-2993, 2009. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. HANSON, B., NEIDENBACH, P., DeBOER, P., STENGEL, D.: Functional outcomes after nonoperative management of fractures of the proximal humerus. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 18: 612-21, 2009. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. HELMY, N., HINTERMANN, B.: New trends in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. Clin. Orthop., 442: 100-108, 2006. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. HERSCOVICI, D. Jr., SAUNDERS, D. T., JOHNSON, M. P., SANDERS, R., DIPASQUALE, T.: Percutaneous fixation of proximal humeral fractures. Clin. Orthop., 375: 97-104, 2000. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. HERTEL, R., HEMPFING, A., STIEHLER, M., LEUNIG, M.: Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg., 13: 427-33, 2004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. JABERG, H., WARNER, J. J., JAKOB, R. P.: Percutaneous stabilization of unstable fractures of the humerus. J. Bone Jt Surg., 74-A: 508-15, 1992. Go to original source...
  17. KANNUS, P., PALVANEN, M., NIEMI, S., SIEVÄNEN, H., PARKKARI, J.: Rate of proximal humeral fractures in older Finnish women between 1970 and 2007. Bone, 44: 656-9, 2009. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. KONRAD, G.G., MEHLHORN, A., KÜHLE, J., STROHM, P. C., SÜDKAMP, N.P.: Proximal humerus fractures: current treatment options. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 75 :413-21, 2008. Go to original source...
  19. KOUDELA, K., KASAL, E., MATĚJKA, J., VYSKOČIL, V.: Geriatrická traumatologie - vize nebo skutečnost? Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 76: 338 - 343, 2009. Go to original source...
  20. KŘIVOHLÁVEK, M., LUKÁŠ, R., TALLER, S., ŠRÁM, J.: Použití úhlově stabilních implantátů při ošetření zlomenin proximálního humeru: prospektivní studie. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 75: 212-220, 2008. Go to original source...
  21. LILL, H., JOSTEN, C.: Proximale und distale Humerusfrakturen im hohen Alter. Orthopäde 29: 327-341, 2000. Go to original source...
  22. LINHART, W., UEBLACKER, P., GROSSTERLINDEN, L., KSCHOWAK, P., BRIEM, D., JANSSEN, A., HASSUNIZADEH, B., SCHINKE, M., WINDOLF, J., RUEGER, J.M.: Antegrade nailing of humeral head fractures with captured interlocking screws. J. Orthop. Trauma, 21: 285-94, 2007.
  23. MISRA, A., KAPUR, R., MAFFULLI, N.: Complex proximal humeral fractures in adults- a systematic review of management. Injury, 32: 363-72, 2001. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. MITTLMEIER, T. W., STEDTFELD, H.W., EWERT, A., BECK, M., FROSCH, B., GRADL, G.: Stabilization of proximal humeral fractures with an angular and sliding stable antegrade locking nail (Targon PH). J. Bone Jt Surg., 85-A (Suppl 4): 136-46, 2003. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. NEER, C. S.: Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J. Bone Jt Surg., 52: 1077-89, 1970. Go to original source...
  26. NĚMEC, F., CHALOUPKA, R., KRBEC, M., MESSNER, P.: Hodnocení kvality života pacientů s degenerativním onemocněním bederní páteře. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 76: 20-24, 2009. Go to original source...
  27. NHO, S. J., BROPHY, R. H., BARKER, J.U., CORNELL, C. N., MacGILLIVRAY, J. D.: Management of proximal humeral fractures based on current literature. J. Bone Jt Surg., 89-A:44-58, 2007. Go to original source...
  28. NESTROJIL, P., MAŠEK, M., PIKULA, R.: Zlomeniny proximálního humeru.Úraz. Chir., 17, 87-88, 2009.
  29. RESCH, H., POVACZ, P., FROHLICH, R., WAMBACHER, M.: Percutaneous fixation of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. J. Bone Jt Surg., 79-B: 295-300, 1997. Go to original source...
  30. RÜEDI, T. P., BUCKLEY, R. E., MORAN, C. G.: AO Principles of Fracture management. Second edition. Stuttgart, New York, Thieme 2007.
  31. SCHWARTZ, C, CUNY, C: Fractures of the proximal humerus: a prospective review of 188 cases, Europ. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol., 13: 1-12, 2003. Go to original source...
  32. SOLWAY, S., BEATON, D. E., McCONNELL, S., BOMBARDIER, C.: The DASH outcome measure user's manual. Second edition. Toronto, Institute for Work & Health 2002.
  33. SÜDKAMP, N., BAYER, J., HEPP, P., VOIGT, C., OESTERN, H., KÄÄB, M., LUO, C., PLECKO, M., WENDT, K., KÖSTLER, W., KONRAD, G.: Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Results of a prospective, multicenter, observational study. J. Bone Jt Surg., 91-A: 1320-1328, 2009. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. TINGART, M., BÄTHIS, H., BOUILLON, B., TILING, T.: Die dislozierte proximale Humerusfraktur: Gibt es gesicherte Therapiekonzepte? Chirurg, 72: 1284-91, 2001. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. VIŠŇA, R., BEITL, E., JAGANJAC, E., KALVACH, J., ŠMlDL, Z: Ošetření zlomenin proximálního humeru pomocí úhlově stabilního antegrádního zajištěného nitrodřeňového hřebu - prospektivní studie. Rozhl. Chir., 86, 194-200, 2007.