Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2013; 80(1):27-33 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2013/004

Transverse + Posterior Wall Fractures of the Acetabulum: Epidemiology, Operative Management and Long-Term ResultsOriginal papers

A. Gänsslen1,*, F. Hildebrand2, C. Krettek2
1 Klinik für Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädie und Handchirurgie, Klinikum der Stadt Wolfsburg, Wolfsburg, Germany
2 Unfallchirurgische Klinik, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:
Associated transverse and posterior wall fractures account for approximately 20% of all acetabular fractures. To asses the risk of these concommitant bone injuries on early joint failure despite a high rate of postoperative congruency.

MATERIAL:
The analysis of 104 surgically treated patients with associated transverse and posterior wall fractures showed that more than half of these patients had associated injuries. The mean age was 35 years, and > 75% of these patients were male. A high energy trauma was the trauma mechanism in 94.2%. The mean ISS was 26.3 points.
The majority of patients showed a juxta- or transtectal fracture line. The mean articular fracture displacement was 13.5 mm. 87.5% of the patients showed a femoral head dislocation. An acetabular roof comminution was present in 16.3%. 20.2% of patients received a fracture related preoperative nerve injury to the sciatic nerve.

METHODS:
Osteosynthesis was performed 9.9 days after trauma. The Kocher-Langenbeck approach was used in > 90% for stabilization with a combination of plate and screw fixation in 71.1%. The mean operative time was 190 minutes with a blood loss of 855 ml. Postoperatively the hip joint was congruent in 90.3% with anatomical or near-anatomical joint reconstruction in > 90%. Iatrogenic nerve injury occurred in 12 patients (8.9%).

RESULTS:
67 patients (67.7%) could be followed after a mean of 42.7 months. The average subjective Visual Analog Scale pain score was 42.7. Mild or no pain was seen in 58.2%. The mean Merle d'Aubigné score was 15.4 with 56.7% of patients having a functionally perfect or good result.
52.2% had no post-traumatic osteoarthritic changes of their hip joint. A joint failure was diagnosed in 32.8% of the patients.
Analyzing only patients with anatomically reconstructed hip joints, patients showed comparable results with 61.3% having no or mild pain and 59.2% a good or excellent functional result. Posttraumatic arthrotic changes occur in only 26.5% of these patients. A joint failure was present in 32.7%. In this group, a joint failure was significantly more likely to be present with an additional acetabular comminution zone.

CONCLUSION:
Associated transverse and posterior wall fractures have a significant risk of early joint failure despite a high rate of postoperative congruency.

Keywords: acetabulum, transverse fractures, posterior wall fractures, operative management

Published: February 1, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Gänsslen A, Hildebrand F, Krettek C. Transverse + Posterior Wall Fractures of the Acetabulum: Epidemiology, Operative Management and Long-Term Results. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2013;80(1):27-33. doi: 10.55095/achot2013/004. PubMed PMID: 23452418.
Download citation

References

  1. Baker, S., o'Neill, B.: The Injury Severity Score: an update. J. Trauma, 16: 882-885, 1976. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Bosch, U., Pohlemann, T., Haas, N., Tscherne, H.: Klassifikation und Management des komplexen Beckentraumas. Unfallchirurg, 95: 189-196, 1992.
  3. Brooker, A., Bowerman, J. W., Robinson, R. A., Riley L. H. Jr.: Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement: incidence and a method of classification. J. Bone Jt Surg., 55-A: 1629-1632, 1973. Go to original source...
  4. Dakin, G. J., Eberhardt, A. W., Alonso, J. E., Stannard, J. P., Mann, K. A.: Acetabular fracture patterns: associations with motor vehicle crash information. J. Trauma, 47: 1063-1071, 1999. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Debrunner, H.: Orthopädisches Diagnostikum. 5. Aufl., Thieme, Stuttgart, New York: 34, 1987.
  6. Ficat, R., Arlet, J.: Ischemia and necrosis of bone. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore London. 1980.
  7. Giannoudis, P. V., Grotz, M. R., Papakostidis, C., Dinopoulos, H.: Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum. A meta-analysis. J. Bone Jt Surg., 87-B: 2-9, 2005. Go to original source...
  8. Harris, H.: Traumatic Arthritis of the Hip After Dislocation and Acetabular Fractures: Treatment by Mold Arthroplasty. An End Result Study Using a New Method of Result Evaluation. J. Bone Jt Surg., 51-A: 737-755, 1969. Go to original source...
  9. Letournel, E., Judet, R.: Fractures of the acetabulum. 2nd ed., Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer-Verlag, 1993. Go to original source...
  10. Matta, J.: Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results of fractures operated within three weeks after the injury. J. Bone Jt Surg., 78-A: 1632-1645, 1996. Go to original source...
  11. Matta, J., Anderson, L., Epstein, H., Hendricks, P.: Fractures of the acetabulum: a retrospective analysis. Clin. Orthop., 205: 230-240, 1986. Go to original source...
  12. Matta, J., Mehne, D., Roffi, R.: Fractures of the acetabulum: early results of a prospective study. Clin. Orthop., 186: 241-250, 1986. Go to original source...
  13. Mears, D. C., Velyvis, J. H., Chang, C. P.: Displaced acetabular fractures managed operatively: indicators of outcome. Clin. Orthop., 407: 173-186, 2003. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Merle d'Aubigné, M.: Traitement chirurgical de la coxarthrie. Soc. Intern. de Chirurgie Orthopaedique, 240-247, 1948.
  15. Moore, E., Cogbill, T., Malangoni, M., Jurkovich, G., Shackford, S., Champion, H., McAnnich, J.: Organ Injury Scaling. Surg. Clin. North Am., 75: 293-303, 1995. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. OTA, Fracture and dislocation compendium. J.: Orthop. Trauma, 10(Suppl. 1): 71-75, 1996.
  17. Pohlemann, T., Gänsslen, A., Hartung, S.: für die Arbeitsgruppe Becken: Beckenverletzungen/Pelvic Injuries. Hefte zu "Der Unfallchirurg", Heft 266, 1998.
  18. Rupp, J., Reed, M., Van Ee, C., Kuppa, S., Wang, S., Goulet, J., Schneider, L.: The tolerance of the human hip to dynamic knee loading. Stapp. Car Crash J., 46: 211-228, 2002. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Teasdale, G., Jenett, B.: Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: a practical scale. Lancet, 2: 81-83, 1974. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Tscherne, H., Regel, G., Sturm, J., Friedl, H.: Schweregrad und Prioritäten bei Mehrfachverletzungen. Chirurg, 58: 631-640, 1987.
  21. Zinghi, G., Briccoli, A., Bungaro, P., Davoli, O., Ponziani, L., Rollo, G., Trono, M.: Chapter Ten: Fractures in the vertical plane. in Zinghi, G. F.: Fractures of the pelvis and acetabulum, Thieme-Verlag, Stuttgart, 157-163, 2004.