Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2013; 80(5):328-334 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2013/053
Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: The Outcome and Potential Complications of Surgical TreatmentOriginal papers
- 1 The Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic surgery, Royal Derby Hospital, UK
- 2 Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles' University, Prague
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy is the most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction in patients over 60 years old. Symptoms often develop gradually and insidiously and are characterized by neck stiffness, arm pain, numbness and clumsiness of hands, as well as weakness of the hands and legs frequently leading to a change in mobility. Surgery is performed primarily to prevent the progression of symptoms but also with the aim of improving existing symptoms.
Aim of our study was to assess the outcomes and potential complications of surgical decompression of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Prospective data was collected from 71 patients who were treated surgically for CSM over a four-year period (June 2006 to June 2010). Only patients with confirmed spondylotic cervical myelopathy were included in the study; those with an inflammatory, infectious or neoplastic etiology were excluded. The Nurick scale was used as a primary outcome measure, and the improvement in upper limb function as a secondary outcome measure. Statistical significance was assessed using the paired t-test.
RESULTS:
34/71 (47.9%) patients had an anterior decompression, 36/71 (50.7%) patients underwent posterior surgery and one patient (1.4%) received a combined approach:
The Nurick score: The mean score improved by 0.9 from 2.4 preoperatively to 1.5 postoperatively for the whole series. Three patients were able to return to work. The preoperative Nurick score showed a positive correlation with the postoperative Nurick score at one year (Pearson Coefficient = 0.85).
Upper limb symptoms: Postoperatively, 24 patients were free of any upper limb involvement compared with 6 patients preoperatively. The main improvement was in patients who prior to surgery had subjective symptoms with no objective signs of weakness or muscle wasting. 35/48 (72.9%) of this group showed improvement compared to 7/17 (41.2%) of patients who demonstrated objective weakness and/or wasting preoperatively.
Complications: The overall rate of complications was 18.2%. There were two mortalities as a result of pneumonia (2.8%), one patient had to be transferred to the intensive care unit for cardiac failure (1.4%), fixation failure occurred in two patients (2.8%), worsening of myelopathy occurred in two patients (2.8%), C5 temporary radiculopathy presented in two patients (2.8%), superficial wound infection developed in one patient (1.4%) and three patients (4.2%) complained of severe axial pain in the postoperative period.
DISCUSSION:
Our results demonstrate that the greater the preoperative disability the greater the final disability is expected to be. Cord signal change, as an indicator of the pathological severity of the disease, correlates with a worse functional outcome. The degree of improvement postoperatively (i.e. the functional change) does not show a significant correlation with the initial preoperative status. It appears however, that there is a better chance of improvement in patients with no objectively detectable weakness or muscle wasting. The rate of complications encountered in this series is comparable with those in the literature, which renders them valid for quoting when considering surgical treatment for CSM.
CONCLUSION:
Surgical decompression offers a real chance of improvement in the functional outcome of CSM, especially during the earlier stages of the disease. The surgical decision needs to be considered carefully due to the advanced age of the patient population and the greater burden of co-morbidities, which increase the surgical risks significantly.
Keywords: myelopathy, Nurick, cervical, surgical decompression, upper limb in myelopathy
Published: October 1, 2013 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- AL-MEFTY, O., HARKEY, H. L., MARAWI, I., HAINES, D. E., PEELER, D. F., WILNER, H. I., SMITH, R. R., HOLADAY, H. R., HAINING, J. L., RUSSELL, W. F., HARRISON, B., MIDDLETON, T. H.: Experimental chronic compressive cervical myelopathy. J. Neurosurg., 79: 550-561, 1993.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- CUNNIGHAM, M., HERSHMAN, S., BENDO, J.: Systematic review of cohort studies comparing surgical treatments for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine, 35: 537-543, 2010.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- EDWARDS, C. C., RIEW, K. D., ANDERSON, P. A., HILIBRAND, A. S., VACCARO, A. F.: Cervical myelopathy. Current diagnosis and treatment strategies. Spine J., 3: 68-81, 2003.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- EMERY, S. E., BOHLMAN, H. H., BOLESTA, M. J., JONES, P. K.: Anterior cervical decompression and arthrodesis for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Two to seventeen-year follow-up. J. Bone Jt Surg., 80-A: 941-951, 1998.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- FEHLINGS, M. G., SMITH, J. S., KOPJAR, B., ARNOLD, P. M., YOON, S. T., VACCARO, A. R., BRODKE, D. S., JANSSEN, M. E., CHAPMAN, J. R., SASSO, R. C., WOODARD, E. J., BANCO, R. J., MASSICOTE, E. M., DEKUTOSKI, M. B., GOKASLAN, Z. L., BONO, C. M., SHAFFREY, C. I.: Perioperative and delayed complications associated with the surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy based on 302 patients from the AO Spine North America Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Study. J. Neurosurg. Spine, 16: 425-432, 2012.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- KADANKA, Z., BEDNARIK, J., VOHANKA, S., VLACH, O., CHALOUPKA, R., FILIPOVICOVA, D., SURELOVA, D., ADAMOVA, B. NOVOTNY, O., NEMEC, M., SMRCKA, V., URBANEK, I.: Conservative treatment versus surgery in spondylotic cervical myelopathy: a prospective randomised study. Eur. Spine J., 9: 538-544, 2000.
- KADANKA, Z., MARES, M., BEDNARIK, J., SMERCKA, V., KRBEC, M., CHALOUPKA, R., DUSEK, L.: Predictive factors for spondylotic cervical myelopathy treated conservatively or surgically. Eur. J. Neurol., 12: 55-63, 2005.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- KOHNO, K., KUMON, Y., OKA, Y.: Evaluation of prognostic factors following expansive laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Surg. Neurol., 48: 237-245, 1997.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- MALCOLM, G. P., RANSFORD, A. O., CROCKARD, H. A.: Treatment of non-rheumatoid occipitocervical instability. Internal fixation with the Hartshill-Ransford loop. J. Bone Jt Surg., 76-B: 357-366, 1994.
Go to original source...
- MATSUNGA, S., SAKOU, T., ONISHI, T., HAYASHI, K., TAKETOMI, S., SUNAHARA, N., KOMIYA, S.: Prognosis of Patients With Upper Cervical Lesions Caused by Rheumatoid Arthritis: Comparison of Occipitocervical Fusion Between C1 Laminectomy and Nonsurgical Management. Spine, 28: 1581-1587, 2003.
Go to original source...
- NURICK, S.: The pathogenesis of spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain, 95: 87-100, 1972.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- OKADA, K., SHIRASAKI, N., HAYASHI, H., OKA, S., HOSOYA, T.: Treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy by enlargement of the spinal canal anteriorly, followed by arthrodesis. J. Bone Jt Surg., 73-A: 352-364, 1991.
Go to original source...
- OMURA, K., HUKUD, A. S., KATSURA, A., SARUHASHI, Y., IMANAKA, T., IMAI, S.: Evaluation of posterior long fusion versus conservative treatment for the progressive rheumatoid cervical spine. Spine, 27: 1336-1345, 2002.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- ONO, K., EBARA, S., FUJI, T., YONENOBU, K., FUJIWARA, K., YAMASHITA, K.: Myelopathy hand. New clinical signs of cervical cord damage. J. Bone Jt Surg., 69-B: 215-219, 1987.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- RAO, R. D., GOURAB, K., DAVID, K.: Operative treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy- Current Concepts Review. J. Bone Jt Surg.,88-A: 1619-1640, 2006.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- RIEW, K. D., BUCHOWSKI, J. M., SASSO, R., METCALF, N. H., ANDERSON, P. A.: Cervical disc arthroplasty compared with arthrodesis for the treatment of myelopathy. J. Bone Jt Surg., 90-A: 2354-2364, 2008.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- SAMPATH, P., BENDEBBA, M,, DAVIS, J. D., DUCKER, T. B.: Outcome of patients treated for cervical myelopathy: a prospective, multicentre study with independent clinical review. Spine, 25: 670-676, 2000.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- SURI, A., CHABBRA, R. P., MEHTA, V. S., GAIKWARD, S., PANDEY, R. M.: Effect of intramedullary signal changes on the surgical outcome of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine J., 3: 33-45, 2003.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- TRACY, J. A., BARTLESON, J. D.: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurologist, 16: 176-87, 2010.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- VOKUHLI, R. R., HINTON, R. C.: Sensory impairment in the hands secondary to spondylotic compression of the cervical spinal cord. Arch. Neurol., 47: 309-311, 1990.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...