Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae
et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca

Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2015; 82(3):216-221 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2015/032

Transfixace nestabilních zlomenin hlezna Kirschnerovými dráty: indikace, technika provedení a výsledkyPůvodní práce

J. MARVAN^1,*, V. DŽUPA¹, R. BARTOŠKA¹, D. KACHLÍK^2,3, M. KRBEC¹, V. BÁČA^2,3

¹ Ortopedicko-traumatologická klinika FNKV a 3. LF UK Praha

² Ústav anatomie 3. LF UK Praha

³ Katedra zdravotnických studií, Vysoká škola polytechnická Jihlava

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:
The aim of the study was to assess treatment outcomes in patients undergoing K-wire transfixation of unstable ankle fractures and compare the results with those of patients in whom it was possible to perform primary one-stage osteosynthesis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Between 2009 and 2012, a total of 358 patients (191 women and 167 men) had surgery for unstable ankle fracture. At 1-year follow-up, their subjective feelings, objective findings and ankle radiographs were evaluated. The fractures were categorised according to the Weber classification. A patient group treated by one-stage osteosynthesis, a group with definitive transfixation and a group of patients in whom temporary transfixation was converted to definitive osteosynthesis were assessed and compared.

RESULTS:
The group treated by one-stage osteosynthesis included 278 patients with an average age of 47 years; the group of 20 patients with definitive transfixation had an average age of 67 years, and the group of 60 patients who had temporary transfixation with subsequent conversion to internal osteosynthesis were 55 years on average. In the group with one-stage osteosynthesis, 223 (80%) ankle fractures on post-injury radiographs were associated with minor joint dislocations and 55 (20%) with major dislocations. On the other hand, the radiographs of the patients treated by temporary transfixation and delayed open reduction with internal fixation showed major dislocations in 38 (63%) and minor dislocations in the rest of the patients (37%); the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p<0.001). Posterior malleolar fractures were most frequent in the group with temporary transfixation (60%) and least frequent in the group with primary osteosynthesis (44%); also this difference was statistically significant (p=0.032).
At one-year follow-up, in the group with one-stage osteosynthesis, 220 patients (79%) had no radiographic signs of post-traumatic ankle osteoarthritis while, in the group with temporary transfixation, no radiographic evidence of ankle osteoarthritis was recorded in 25 (42%) patients. While tibiofibular synostosis was recorded in only few patients (9%) of the group with one-stage osteosynthesis, it showed a high occurrence in the group with temporary transfixation (35%). The patients with one-stage osteosynthesis (188/68%) had a higher proportion of excellent outcomes measured on the Olerund-Molander ankle scoring scale than the other two groups (temporary transfixation, 47%; definitive transfixation, 10%); in both cases the difference was significant (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively).

DISCUSSION:
In this study the morphological and clinical aspects of surgically treated ankle fractures were assessed. The patients with one-stage osteosynthesis were compared with those treated by temporary or definitive transfixation. The majority of patients undergoing temporary transfixation had a fractured posterior margin of the tibia and major ankle joint dislocation, which suggested serious injuries to bone and ligament structures. Generally, the use of only two K-wires inserted through the calcaneus and talus into the distal tibia is recommended. Patients with K-wire transfixation usually require a longer hospital stay because of the serious nature of their injuries.

CONCLUSIONS:
The therapy of choice for unstable ankle fractures is one-stage osteosynthesis. Temporary transfixation is an effective method of primary management when an unstable fracture cannot be treated by definitive osteosynthesis at the early stage due to local or general health conditions of the patient. The temporary transfixation provides good alignment of the ankle joint necessary for successful healing of soft tissues. A higher occurrence of post-traumatic ankle osteoarthritis, ossification and distal tibiotalar synostosis found in the patients treated by temporary transfixation is more related to serious types of ankle fractures the patient had suffered than to the method itself.

Klíčová slova: unstable ankle fracture, soft tissue condition, indications for transfixation, treatment outcome

Zveřejněno: 1. červen 2015  Zobrazit citaci