Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2015; 82(4):288-292 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2015/044

Does an Independent Predictor of In-Hospital Mortality Exist for Patients with Isolated Proximal Femoral Fracture? A Retrospective Two-Year Observational StudyOriginal papers

M. «OUKÁLKOVÁ1,2, P. ©TOURAČ1,2,*, O. SMÉKALOVÁ1, A. ©TOURAČOVÁ3, T. PAVLÍK4,5, M. REPKO6, M. MA©EK7
1 Klinika anesteziologie, resuscitace a intenzivní medicíny, Fakultní nemocnice Brno, Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity, Brno
2 Klinika dětské anesteziologie a resuscitace, Fakultní nemocnice Brno, Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity, Brno
3 Radiologická klinika, Fakultní nemocnice Brno, Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity, Brno
4 Institut biostatistiky a analýz, Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity, Brno
5 Ústav zdravotnických informací a statistiky ČR, Praha
6 Ortopedická klinika, Fakultní nemocnice Brno, Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity, Brno
7 Klinika úrazové chirurgie, Fakultní nemocnice Brno, Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity, Brno

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:
The primary objective of the study was to find out in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing surgery for proximal femoral fracture. The secondary objective was to identify independent predictors of in-hospital mortality.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:
A retrospective single-centre observational study PROXIMORT of patients operated on for isolated proximal femoral fracture at the University Hospital (FN) Brno in the years 2011 and 2012. The 30-day and overall one-year mortality in the study group and the impact of observed parameters on mortality were also assessed. The observed parameters were: patient age and sex, ASA score, time from injury to surgery (hr), daily (7-20 hr) or night (20-7 hr) time of surgery, type of anaesthesia (general vs spinal), initial haemoglobin and haematocrit levels, intra-operative administration of blood products and vasopressors, and erudition of the anaesthesiologist and surgeon.
To evaluate the relationship of in-hospital mortality to the observed characteristics, we used univariate logistic regression modelling and odds ratio, using SPSS 22 software (IBM, USA).

RESULTS:
Data were obtained from 414 patients and 369 patients were included (male, n = 91; female, n = 278). Due to exclusion criteria, 45 patients were excluded (not an isolated injury). In-hospital mortality was 6.5% (n = 24), 30-day mortality was 8.4% (n = 31) and total mortality of the study group was 35.8% (n = 132). Statistically significant effects on in-hospital mortality included: older age of the patient (p = 0.013), ASA score of 3 or more (p = 0.002) and general anaesthesia administration (p = 0.043). For 30-day mortality, this was older age (p = 0.012), ASA score of 3 and more (p < 0.001), general anaesthesia administration (p < 0.001), lower weight (p = 0.028), lower BMI (p = 0.006) and intra-operative administration of vasopressors (p = 0.023). The influence of other observed parameters on post-operative mortality was not statistically significant.

DISCUSSION:
In-hospital mortality in the PROXIMORT study was 6.5% (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.2 to 9.5%), which was significantly higher than in-hospital mortality in unselected surgically treated patients in the Czech Republic, as reported in the EuSOS study (2.3% with 95% CI 0.9 to 3.7%). Administration of general anaesthesia was determined as an independent predictor of in-hospital and 30-day mortality, which was concordant with the results of meta-analysis published by Rodgers et al. and Barbosa et al in 2013. Postponing surgery for perioperative optimisation had no effect on mortality according to the PROXIMORT study. Patorn et al. have supported this conclusion by the results of a selected group of patients with surgery delayed for more than 24 hours; the patients mortality, regardless of anaesthesia, was up to 2.5%.

CONCLUSIONS:
The PROXIMORT study identified the higher patient age, ASA score of 3 and more and general anaesthesia administration as independent predictors of in-hospital mortality.

Keywords: proximal femoral fracture, general anaesthesia, spinal anaesthesia, in-hospital mortality

Published: August 1, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
«OUKÁLKOVÁ M, ©TOURAČ P, SMÉKALOVÁ O, ©TOURAČOVÁ A, PAVLÍK T, REPKO M, MA©EK M. Does an Independent Predictor of In-Hospital Mortality Exist for Patients with Isolated Proximal Femoral Fracture? A Retrospective Two-Year Observational Study. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2015;82(4):288-292. doi: 10.55095/achot2015/044. PubMed PMID: 26516733.
Download citation

References

  1. BARBOSA, F. T., CASTRO, A. A., SOUSA-RODRIGUES, C. F.: Neuraxial anesthesia for orthopedic surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Sao Paulo Med. J.,131: 411-421, 2013. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. BRAMMAR, A., NICHOLSON, A., TRIVELLA, M., SMITH, A. F.: Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 11, 9: CD003004, 2013. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. DREVET, S., BIOTEAU, C., MAZIÉRE, S., COUTURIER, P., MERLOZ, P., TONETTI, J., GAVAZZI, G.: Prevalence of protein-energy malnutrition in hospital patients over 75 years of age admitted for hip fracture. Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res., 100: 669-674, 2014. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. D®UPA, V., BARTONÍČEK, J., SKÁLA-ROSENBAUM, J., PŘÍKAZSKÝ, V.: Úmrtí pacientů se zlomeninou proximálního femuru v průběhu prvního roku po úrazu. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 69: 39-44, 2002.
  5. HOZA, P., HÁLA, T. PILNÝ, J.: Zlomeniny proximálního femuru a jejich řeąení. Med. Praxi, 5: 393-397, 2008.
  6. CHACKO, A. T., RAMIREZ, M. A., RAMAPPA, A. J., RICHARDSON, L. C., APPLETON, P. T., RODRIGUEZ, E. K.: Does late night hip surgery affect outcome? J. Trauma., 71: 447-453, 2011. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. LUGER, T. J., KAMMERLANDER, C., LUGER, M. F., KAMMERLANDER-KNAUER, U., GOSCH, M.: Mode of anesthesia, mortality and outcome in geriatric patients. Z. Gerontol. Geriatr., 47: 110-124, 2014. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. MULLEN, J. O., MULLEN, N. L.: Hip fracture mortality. A prospective, multifactorial study to predict and minimize death risk. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 280: 214-222, 1992. Go to original source...
  9. NEUMAN, M. D., ROSENBAUM, P. R., LUDWIG, J. M., ZUBIZARRETA, J. R., SILBER, J. H.: Anesthesia technique, mortality, and length of stay after hip fracture surgery. JAMA, 25; 311: 2508-2517, 2014. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. PATORNO, E., NEUMAN, M. D., SCHNEEWEISS, S., MOGUN, H., BATEMAN, B. T.: Comparative safety of anesthetic type for hip fracture surgery in adults: retrospective cohort study. BMJ, 27: 348, 2014. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. PEARSE, R. M., MORENO, R. P., BAUER, P., PELOSI, P., METNITZ, P., SPIES, C., VALLET, B., VINCENT, J. L., HOEFT, A., RHODES, A.: Mortality after surgery in Europe: a 7 day cohort study. Lancet, 380: 1059-1065, 2012. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. RASHID, R. H., ZUBAIRI, A. J., SLOTE, M. U., NORDIN, S.: Hip fracture surgery: does time of the day matter? A case-controlled study. Int. J. Surg.,11: 923-925, 2013. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. RODGERS, A., WALKER, N., SCHUG, S., MCKEE, A., KEHLET, H., VAN ZUNDERT, A., SAGE, D., FUTTER, M., SAVILLE, G., CLARK, T., MACMAHON, S.: Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials. BMJ, 321: 1493, 2000. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. SHIGA, T., WAJIMA, Z., OHE, Y.: Is operative delay associated with increased mortality of hip fracture patients? Systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Can. J. Anaesth., 55: 146-154, 2008. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...