Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae
et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca

Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2016; 83(5):332-335 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2016/052

Perilunate Injuries to the WristOriginal papers

J. PILNÝ^1,2,*, V. BÁČA^3,4, L. KOHOUTEK⁵, H. VODOVÁ^6,7, K. HORÁČKOVÁ², A. SUKOP⁸

¹ Ortopedické oddělení, Nemocnice Nové Město na Moravě, příspěvková organizace

² Fakulta zdravotnických studií, Univerzita Pardubice

³ Katedra zdravotnických studií, Polytechnická univerzita Jihlava

⁴ Anatomický ústav, 3. lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy, Praha

⁵ Chirurgické oddělení, Nemocnice Frýdlant s. r. o.

⁶ Ústav anatomie, Lékařská Fakulta Univerzity Karlovy v Hradci Králové

⁷ Ortopedicko-Traumatologické oddělení, Oblastní nemocnice Náchod pobočka Rychnov nad Kněžnou

⁸ Klinika Plastické chirurgie, 3. lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy, Fakultní nemocnice Královské Vinohrady, Praha

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:
Perilunate dislocations and perilunate fractures are serious wrist injuries which are often overlooked at primary treatment. Their inadequate therapy results in severe wrist damage and patient disability. An early diagnosis and correct therapy can prevent such conditions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:
A group of 25 patients with 26 wrist injuries is presented. It included nine patients with isolated perilunate dislocations (34%), 11 patients with trans-scaphoid perilunate dislocations (44%),two with trans-radial trans-scaphoid perilunate dislocations (7%) and next two patients with trans-radial perilunate dislocations (7%). One patients had, in addition to perilunate dislocation, injury to the capitohamat joint with damage to both portions of the interosseous ligament (4%). One patient (4%) sustained a trans-scaphoid perilunate dislocation with injury to the scapholunate ligament, in which the proximal pole of the scaphoid was separated and interfered with dislocation reduction.

RESULTS:
The correct diagnosis was made on early examination in 16 patients (62%), within a week of injury in four patients (15%), within a months of injury in two patients (8%) and even later in four patients (15%). The results of treatment evaluation based on the Wrightington Hospital Wrist Scoring System were excellent in 19%, good in 54%, satisfactory in 19% and poor in 8% of the patients. The poor result in one patient was due to necrosis of the lunate bone;the diagnosis of a perilunate dislocation was made within a month of injury. The poor results in the other patient were associated with complex regional pain syndrome.

DISCUSSION:
Perilunate injuries of the wrist are quite frequent and although the treatment procedure is commonly known, its principles are not always obeyed. A good outcome is related to an early diagnosis and correct reconstruction of the injured structures. In our group, the diagnosis was made at the first examination in only 62% of patients and later than a week after injury in 23%. The patient in whom necrosis of the lunate bone developed had the diagnosis made at 1 post-injury month. Early reduction of bone structures and reconstruction of ligaments also contribute to good results.

CONCLUSIONS:
Good outcomes in perilunate injuries depend on an early and correct diagnosis, an appropriate therapeutic procedure and an orthopaedic surgeon who has experience with management of such injuries. A deep knowledge of wrist kinetics is necessary for this therapy as not all injuries happen according to textbook descriptions.

Keywords: perilunate dislocation, carpal instability, damage to carpal ligaments

Published: October 1, 2016  Show citation