Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2020; 87(3):145-154 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2020/025

Naše zkušenosti s jamkou RM Pressfit Vitamys a s krátkým necementovaným dříkem OptimysPůvodní práce

E. ŠŤASTNÝ*, M. HANUS, R. HUDÁK, D. ĎURICA, T. TRČ
Klinika dětské a dospělé ortopedie a traumatologie 2. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice v Motole, Praha

INTRODUCTION:
The purpose of our study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes in patients at 3-6 years follow-up after primary implantation of RM Pressfit Vitamys cementless elastic cup and cementless Optimys short stem, including bone tissue remodelling around both the components.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:
The evaluation covered 49 joint replacements in patients who had undergone surgery at our department between 2012 and 2015. The age at the time of primary surgery ranged from 29 to 71 years, with the mean value of 59.2 years. Postoperatively, the position of endoprosthesis, changes in femoroacetabular offset, signs of osseointegration of the implant, bone tissue remodelling around both the components and potential signs of aseptic loosening were assessed. The functional status of the joint was evaluated according to the Harris scale.

RESULTS:
The mean follow-up time of Vitamys cup and Optimys stem was 5.6 years and 4.6 years, respectively. We focused on the combination of RM Pressfit Vitamys (49x), Optimys (28x) and Bionit 2 (41x) implants. All the cups showed good osseointegration. Based on the comparisons with a postoperative X-ray, at least mild osteoporosis in the acetabular roof was confirmed in 6 cases. All Optimys femoral components were in direct contact with the Adams arch and with the endosteal side of lateral cortex of proximal femoral metadiaphysis. Femoroacetabular offset was slightly decreased in 5 patients only. The final evaluation in 2018 did not confirm any radiolucent lines or signs osteolysis around any of the components. In 2 stems only, distal migration less than 2 mm was obvious, with subsequent good osseointegration. Signs of stress shielding were present in 2 femoral components in the form of mild cortical atrophy in the region of the Adams arch. Distal femoral cortical hypertrophy was not observed, the greater trochanter did not show the loss of bone tissue in any of the patients. There were no signs of polyethylene wear. The mean value of HHS increased from 53 to 97 points. An excellent result was achieved in 44 total hip replacements, of which 100 points in 28 cases. In the remaining 5 patients the result was good. The survival rate of both the components was 100% according to the Kaplan-Meier analysis.

DISCUSSION:
The successful functioning of cementless total hip arthroplasty is the correct placement of both components with good primary fixation. Excessive proximal and lateral shift of the centre of rotation results in increased load of endoprosthesis and risk of earlier aseptic loosening, its reduction leads to the weakening of pelvitrochanteric muscles. The shift of the centre of rotation from the original anatomical position should therefore not exceed 5 millimetres. Insufficient cup fixation always results in mechanical failure of an endoprosthesis. Distal migration of stems without contact with external femoral cortex with full weight-bearing of the operated lower extremity in the postoperative period does not constitute a sign of instability, but only its placement enables good osseointegration. Bone remodelling can be assessed by imaging techniques at 2 years after the primary implantation at the earliest. At places with lower load, the bone loss occurs and the loss of bone trabeculae can lead to the failure of fixation of the component. At places with load accumulation, the bone hypertrophy occurs that can be manifested by thigh pain. In case of cementless press-fit cup, the degree of bone remodelling depends on its elasticity, in case of stem on the used material, shape and fixation site.

CONCLUSIONS:
The RM Pressfit Vitamys monobloc cup through its mechanical properties approximates the best the elasticity of bone tissue. The stress distribution around the implant is more symmetrical as against other conventional cementless cups. The Optimys stem enables the reconstruction of anatomical conditions corresponding a healthy hip joint. Respecting the rule of at least three-point fixation is a precondition for good and fast secondary stability of components. Minimising the wear of articulating surfaces and physiological remodelling of adjacent bone tissue are the main factors that help prolong the survivorship of both the components, while also securing more favourable conditions and better outcomes in case of necessity of reimplantation.

Klíčová slova: cementless elastic cup, short cementless stem, femoroacetabular offset, stress shielding, osseointegration of the implant

Zveřejněno: 1. červen 2020  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
ŠŤASTNÝ E, HANUS M, HUDÁK R, ĎURICA D, TRČ T. Naše zkušenosti s jamkou RM Pressfit Vitamys a s krátkým necementovaným dříkem Optimys. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2020;87(3):145-154. doi: 10.55095/achot2020/025. PubMed PMID: 32773014.
Stáhnout citaci

Reference

  1. Bagge M. A model of bone adaptation as an optimization process. J Biomech. 2000;33:1349-1357. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  2. Berli BJ, Ping G, Dick W, Morscher EW. Nonmodular flexible press-fit cup in primary total hip arthroplasty: 15 year follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;461:114-121. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  3. Erivan R, Eymond G, Villatte G, Mulliez A, Myriam G, Descamps S, Boisgard S. RM Pressfit cup: good preliminary results at 5 to 8 years follow-up for 189 patients. Hip Int. 2016;26:386-391. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  4. Gasbarra E, Celi M, Perrone FL, Iundusi R, Di Primio L, Guglielmi G, Tarantino U. Osseointegration of Fitmore stem in total hip arthroplasty. J Clin Densitom. 2014;17:307-313. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  5. Gasser B. Coating of the RM cup. In: G. Horne (ed). Hip-joint surgery: the RM Cup long-term experience with an elastic monobloc acetabular implant. Einhorn-Presse Verlag, Hamburg, 2008, pp.23.
  6. Gustke, K Short stems for total hip arthroplasty: initial experience with the Fitmore stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(Suppl A): 47-51. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  7. Halma JJ, Eshuis R, Vogely HC, van Gaalen SM, de Gast A. An uncemented iso-elastic monoblock acetabular component: preliminary results. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30:615-621. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  8. Hooper N, Sargeant H, Frampton C, Hooper G. Does a titanium-coated polyethylene press-fit cup give reliable midterm results? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473:3806-3810. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  9. Horne GD, Dalton DJ. Does pelvic osteolysis occur with a nonmodular uncemented acetabular component? J Arthroplasty. 2006;21:185-190. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  10. Höhle P, Schröder SM, Pfeil J. Comparison between preoperative digital planning and postoperative outcomes in 197 hip endoprosthesis cases using short stem prostheses. Clin Biomech. 2015;30:46-52. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  11. Ihle M, Mai S, Pfluger D, Siebert W. The results of the titanium-coated RM acetabular component at 20 years: a long-term follow-up of an uncemented primary total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:1284-1290. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  12. Jerosch J, Funken S. Change of offset after implantation of hip alloarthroplasties. Unfallchirurg. 2004;107:475-482. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  13. Jerosch J, Grasselli C, Kothny P. Veränderungen von Offset, CCD-Winkel und Beinlänge nach Implantation einer metadiaphysär fixierten Kurzschaftprothese - eine radiologische Untersuchung. Z Orthop Unfall. 2012;150:20-26. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  14. Kim YH, Choi Y, Kim JS. Comparison of bone mineral density changes around short, metaphyseal-fitting, and conventional cementless anatomical femoral components. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:931-940. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  15. Kutzner KP, Freitag T, Donner S, Kovacevic MP, Bieger R. Outcome of extensive varus and valgus stem alignment in short-stem THA: clinical and radiological analysis using EBRA-FCA. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017;137:431-439. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  16. Kutzner KP, Kovacevic MP, Roeder C, Rehbein P, Pfeil J. Reconstruction of femoro-acetabular offsets using a short-stem. Int Orthop. 2015;39:1269-1275. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  17. Kutzner KP, Pfeil D, Kovacevic MP, Rehbein P, Mai S, Siebert W, Pfeil J. Radiographic alterations in short-stem total hip arthroplasty: a 2-year follow-up study of 216 cases. Hip Int. 2016;26:278-283. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  18. Lacko M, Filip V, Čellár R, Vaško G. [Our experience with the metha short hip stem]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2014;81:70-76. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  19. Laine HJ, Puolakka TJ, Moilanen T, Pajamäki KJ, Wirta J, Lehto MU. The effects of cementless femoral stem shape and proximal surface texture on 'fit-and-fill' characteristics and on bone remodeling. Int Orthop. 2000;24:184-190. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  20. Lerf R, Zurbrugg D, Delfosse D. Use of vitamin E to protect cross-linked UHMWPE from oxidation. Biomaterials. 2010;31:3643-3648. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  21. Liebs TR, Nasser L, Herzberg W, Rüther W, Hassenpflug J. The influence of femoral offset on health-related quality of life after total hip replacement. Bone Joint J. 2014;96:36-42. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  22. Mathys R, et al. The Coating of hip joint cups on their outer surface. In: Wilbert HG, Eyerer P, editors. Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene as biomaterial in orthopaedic surgery. Hogrefe & Huber, Toronto, 1991.
  23. Morscher E, Berli B, Jockers W, Schenk R. Rationale of a flexible pressfit cup in total hip replacement: 5- year follow-up in 280 procedures. Clin Orthop. 1997;341:42-45. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  24. Mueller LA, Schmidt R, Ehrmann C, Nowak TE, Kress A, Forst R, Pfander D. Modes of periacetabular load transfer to cortical and cancellous bone after cemented versus uncemented total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study using computed tomography-assisted osteodensitometry. J Orthop Res. 2009;27:176-182. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  25. Pakvis DF, Heesterbeek PJ, Severens M, Spruit M. Cancellous and cortical bone mineral density around an elastic press-fit socket in total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2016;87:583-588. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  26. Schmidutz F, Graf T, Mazoochian F, Fottner A, Bauer-Melnyk A, Jansson V. Migration analysis of a metaphyseal anchored short-stem hip prosthesis. Acta Orthop. 2012;83:360-365. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  27. Wittenberg RH, Steffen R, Windhagen H, Bücking P, Wilcke A. Five-year results of a cementless short-hip-stem prosthesis. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2013 Mar 19;5:e4. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  28. Wyatt M, Weidner J, Pfluger D, Beck M. The RM Pressfit vitamys: 5-year Swiss experience of the first 100 cups. Hip Int. 2017;27:368-372. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  29. Yan SG, Li D, Yin S, Hua X, Tang J, Schmidutz F. Periprosthetic bone remodeling of short cementless femoral stems in primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96:e8806. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  30. Yoder SA, Brand RA, Pedersen DR, O'Gorman TW. Total hip acetabular component position affects component loosening rates. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;228:79-87. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...