Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2020; 87(5):340-345 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2020/051

Outcome of Surgical and Conservative Treatment of Patients with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - a Prospective Comparative Clinical StudyOriginal papers

H.-C. KÖHLER1,2,*, T. TISCHER1, C. HACKE3, A. GUTCKE2, C. SCHULZE1,2
1 Department of Orthopaedics, Rostock University Medical Centre, Rostock, Germany
2 Department of Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedics, German Armed Forces Hospital of Westerstede, Westerstede, Germany
3 Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Centre, Hamburg, Germany

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:
Subacromial impingement is one of the most common reasons for shoulder pain. The surgical management of this condition has recently become the focus of criticism because of the rising number of surgical procedures and the lack of superiority of surgical over conservative treatment. In this prospective comparative study, we compared standardised conservative care with surgical treatment and placed special emphasis on the patients' ability to work.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:
A total of 106 patients (25 women, 81 men; mean age: 45.4 ± 12.3 years) were included in this prospective comparative clinical study. Patients in the non-operative arm (n = 42) received standardised physiotherapy. Patients in the surgical arm (n = 38) underwent arthroscopic subacromial decompression. All patients were followed up at 3, 6 and 12 months. Shoulder function (Constant score), pain (Numerical Rating Scale), and the duration of inability to work were assessed.

RESULTS:
Shoulder function and pain improved significantly with both kinds of treatment. At no time of follow up we detected significant differences between the two treatment options. An analysis of the patients' ability to work showed that conservative treatment was superior to surgical treatment at 3-month follow-up (0.3 versus 5.0 weeks; p < 0.001) and between 4 and 6-month after intervention (0.2 versus 1.6 weeks; p = 0.032).

DISCUSSION:
In the study presented here, significant improvements in function (Constant score) and pain (NRS) were achieved in both the non-operative and the surgical arm. There were no significant differences between the two groups at any time point. These results are similar to those reported by other authors in recent studies. Unlike other research work, however, our study demonstrated a major difference in the development and duration of inability to work.

CONCLUSIONS:
Conservative and surgical treatment of subacromial impingement syndrome led to similar outcomes for shoulder pain and function at 3, 6 and 12 months after intervention. However, patients who were managed conservatively returned to work significantly earlier than patients who underwent surgery.

Keywords: subacromial impingement, shoulder, constant score, pain, ability to work

Published: October 1, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
KÖHLER H-C, TISCHER T, HACKE C, GUTCKE A, SCHULZE C. Outcome of Surgical and Conservative Treatment of Patients with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome - a Prospective Comparative Clinical Study. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2020;87(5):340-345. doi: 10.55095/achot2020/051. PubMed PMID: 33146602.
Download citation

References

  1. Beard DJ, Rees JL, Cook JA, Rombach I, Cooper C, Merritt N, Shirkey BA, Donovan JL, Gwilym S, Savulescu J, Moser J, Gray A, Jepson M, Tracey I, Judge A, Wartolowska K, Carr AJ, CSAW Study Group. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression for subacromial shoulder pain (CSAW): a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel group, placebo-controlled, three-group, randomised surgical trial. Lancet. 2018;391:329-338. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Beirer M, Imhoff AB, Braun S. Impingement-Syndrome der Schulter. Orthop. 2017;46:373-386. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Butt U, Whiteman A, Wilson J, Paul E, Roy B. Does arthroscopic subacromial decompression improve quality of life. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2015;97:221-223. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Chaudhury S, Gwilym SE, Moser J, Carr AJ. Surgical options for patients with shoulder pain. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010;6:217-226. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Christiansen DH, Falla D, Frost P, Frich LH, Svendsen SW. Physiotherapy after subacromial decompression surgery: development of a standardised exercise intervention. Physiotherapy. 2015;101:327-339. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Djordjevic OC, Vukicevic D, Katunac L, Jovic S. Mobilization with movement and kinesiotaping compared with a supervised exercise program for painful shoulder: results of a clinical trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012;35:454-463. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Dopirak R, Ryu RKN. Management of the failed arthroscopic subacromial decompression: causation and treatment. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2010;18:207-212. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Garving C, Jakob S, Bauer I, Nadjar R, Brunner UH. Impingement syndrome of the shoulder. Dtsch Aerztebl Int. 2017;114:765-776. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Greving K, Dorrestijn O, Winters JC, Groenhof F, van der Meer K, Stevens M, Diercks RL. Incidence, prevalence, and consultation rates of shoulder complaints in general practice. Scand J Rheumatol. 2012;41:150-155. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Hendi OM, Abdulaziz AA, Althaqafi AM, Hindi AM, Khan SA, Atalla AA. Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders and its correlation to physical activity among health specialty students. Int J Prev Med. 2019;10:48. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Holmgren T, Björnsson Hallgren H, Öberg B, Adolfsson L, Johansson K. Effect of specific exercise strategy on need for surgery in patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: randomised controlled study. BMJ. 2012;344:e787. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Ketola S, Lehtinen J, Arnala I, Nissinen M, Westenius H, Sintonen H, Aronen P, Konttinen YT, Malmivaara A, Rousi T. Does arthroscopic acromioplasty provide any additional value in the treatment of shoulder impingement syndrome?: a two-year randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:1326-1334. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Lerch S, Elki S, Jaeger M, Berndt T. [Arthroscopic subacromial decompression]. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2016;28:373-391. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Luime JJ, Koes BW, Hendriksen IJM, Burdorf A, Verhagen AP, Miedema HS, Verhaar JAN. Prevalence and incidence of shoulder pain in the general population: a systematic review. Scand J Rheumatol. 2004;33:73-81. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Luyckx L, Luyckx T, Donceel P, Debeer P. Return to work after arthroscopic subacromial decompression. Acta Orthop Belg. 2011;77:737-742. Go to PubMed...
  16. Magaji SA, Singh HP, Pandey RK. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression is effective in selected patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94:1086-1089. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Neer CS. Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972;54:41-50. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Paavola M, Malmivaara A, Taimela S, Kanto K, Inkinen J, Kalske J, Sinisaari I, Savolainen V, Ranstam J, Järvinen TLN, Finnish Subacromial Impingement Arthroscopy Controlled Trial (FIMPACT) Investigators. Subacromial decompression versus diagnostic arthroscopy for shoulder impingement: randomised, placebo surgery controlled clinical trial. BMJ. 2018;362:k2860. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Paloneva J, Koskela S, Kautiainen H, Vanhala M, Kiviranta I. Consumption of medical resources and outcome of shoulder disorders in primary health care consulters. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:348. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Paloneva J, Lepola V, Karppinen J, Ylinen J, Äärimaa V, Mattila VM. Declining incidence of acromioplasty in Finland. Acta Orthop. 2015;86:220-224. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Podškubka A, Staša M, Dvořák V, Vaculík J. [Arthroscopic subacromial decompression.]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2000;67:175-180. Go to PubMed...
  22. Pokorný D, Sosna A, Jahoda D, Pech J, Šimková M, Szekeresová M. [Physical therapy after shoulder arthroplasty]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2000;67:280-290. Go to PubMed...
  23. Schulze C, Köhler H, Kaltenborn A, Gutcke A, Tischer T. Einfluss von operativer und konservativer Therapie auf die Arbeitsfähigkeit bei Patienten mit subakromialem Impingement - eine prospektive klinische Vergleichsstudie. Z Orthop Unfall. 2017;155:450-456. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Svendsen SW, Frost P, Jensen LD. Time trends in surgery for non-traumatic shoulder disorders and postoperative risk of permanent work disability: a nationwide cohort study. Scand J Rheumatol. 2012;41:59-65. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Vitale MA, Arons RR, Hurwitz S, Ahmad CS, Levine WN. The rising incidence of acromioplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92:1842-1850. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...