Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2020; 87(5):346-349 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2020/052

Význam 3D modelování v edukaci mladých ortopedů při léčení deformit nohyPůvodní práce

E. UYGUR*, İ. TÜRKMEN, B. ÖZTURAN, O. POYANLI
İstanbul Medeniyet University, Göztepe Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:
We hypothesized that preoperative planning with 3D modeling of complex foot deformities would be useful for the education of orthopedics and traumatology residents.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:
This study is prospectively designed study with a control group. Twenty eight residents (study group) who assisted the surgeons during the interventions and ten senior surgeons (control group) were included in the study. All participants assessed virtual 3D-CT images and videos of the cases before the surgery.
Ten adult cases of foot bone deformities were evaluated. 3D-CT reconstruction was performed and a 3D model of each deformity was created using the hospital's picture archiving and communication system. The completed 3D models were sterilized in hydrogen peroxide and put on the surgical table in a sterile manner.
After surgery, the residents (group I) and surgeons (group II) were questioned regarding their satisfaction with 3D modeling. Responses were structured by a five-point Likert scale (1, strongly disagree; 2, disagree; 3, neither agree nor disagree; 4, agree; and 5, strongly agree).

RESULTS:
The surgeons (group II, n = 10) were satisfied with the sterilized 3D models, which they could touch and re-examine on the operating table. The residents (group I, n = 28) were significantly more satisfied than the senior surgeons (p=0.01). The 3D modeling met both the surgeons' and residents' expectations.

DISCUSSION:
The survey results for the surgeons (group II) were satisfied with the sterilized 3D models, which they could touch and re-examine on the operating table (question 3). They gave the best scores (mean, 4.8/5) for clarity of the 3D model. On the other hand, they gave the lowest scores (mean 3.1/5) to 3D models due to its contribution in understanding deformity over virtual 3D-CT evaluations (question 2 and 5).
The residents (group I) differed from those for the senior surgeons. Residents gave the highest scores for understanding of the deformity (question 2 and 5) and clarity (question 1). These outcomes may be interpreted to indicate i) that 3D modeling may be used for education, and ii) that younger surgeons are more interested in novel technological developments. Therefore, the outcomes did differ significantly between the senior surgeons and residents (Table 1). These outcomes may be explicated as; 3D modeling of the foot deformities may not be mandatory for the experienced surgeons for understanding the deformity. On the other hand 3D modeling would be useful tools for younger surgeons and for their education.

CONCLUSIONS:
3D modeling of foot deformities is more informative than virtual 3D videos. However, with consideration of costs and long processing times, 3D printing may be used optimally for rare deformities. When considering the role of touch sense in surgical learning, 3D modeling gives more detailed and more satisfactory planning than virtual 3D videos. 3D modeling is more useful for young surgeons, and it will be used mainly for education in the future.

Klíčová slova: 3D printing, deformity, foot and ankle, simulation

Zveřejněno: 1. říjen 2020  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
UYGUR E, TÜRKMEN İ, ÖZTURAN B, POYANLI O. Význam 3D modelování v edukaci mladých ortopedů při léčení deformit nohy. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2020;87(5):346-349. doi: 10.55095/achot2020/052. PubMed PMID: 33146603.
Stáhnout citaci

Reference

  1. AlAli AB, Griffin MF, Calonge WM, Butler PE. Evaluating the use of cleft lip and palate 3D-printed models as a teaching aid. J Surg Educ. 2018;75:200-208. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  2. Angelini A, Trovarelli G, Berizzi A, Pala E, Breda A, Ruggieri P. Three-dimension-printed custom-made prosthetic reconstructions : from revision surgery to oncologic reconstructions. Int Orthop. 2019;43:123-132. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  3. Cha YH, Lee KH, Ryu HJ, Joo IW, Seo A, Kim DH, Kim SJ. Ankle-foot orthosis made by 3D printing technique and automated design software. Appl Bionics Biomech. 2017;2017:9610468. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  4. Chen C, Cai L, Zheng W, Wang J, Guo X, Chen H. The efficacy of using 3D printing models in the treatment of fractures : a randomised clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20:65. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  5. Corona PS, Vicente M, Tetsworth K, Glatt V. Preliminary results using patient specific 3D printed models to improve preoperative planning for correction of post-traumatic tibial deformities with circular frames. Injury. 2018;49:S51-59. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  6. de Muinck Keizer RJO, Lechner KM, Mulders MAM, Schep NWL, Eygendaal D, Goslings JC. Three-dimensional virtual planning of corrective osteotomies of distal radius malunions : a systematic review and meta-analysis. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr.2017;12:77-89. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  7. Galvez M, Asahi T, Baar A, Carcuro G, Cuchacovich N, Fuentes JA, Mardones R, Montoya CE, Negrin R, Otayza F, Rojas GM, Chahin A. Use of three-dimensional printing in orthopaedic surgical planning. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018;2:e071. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  8. Giovinco NA, Dunn SP, Dowling L, Smith C, Trowell L, Ruch JA, Armstrong DG. A novel combination of printed 3-dimensional anatomic templates and computer-assisted surgical simulation for virtual preoperative planning in charcot foot reconstruction. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;51:387-393. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  9. Jastifer JR, Gustafson PA. Three-dimensional printing and surgical simulation for preoperative planning of deformity correction in foot and ankle surgery. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;56:191-195. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  10. Lim PK, Stephenson GS, Keown TW, Byrne C, Lin CC, Marecek GS, Scolaro JA. Use of 3D printed models in resident education for the classification of acetabulum fractures. J Surg Educ. 2018;75:1679-1684. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  11. López-Torres II, Sanz-Ruíz P, León-Román VE, Navarro-García F, Priego-Sánchez R, Vaquero-Martín J. 3D printing in experimental orthopaedic surgery: do it yourself. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019;29:967-973. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  12. Medina Herrera L, Castro Pérez J, Juárez Ordóñez S. Developing spatial mathematical skills through 3D tools: augmented reality, virtual environments and 3D printing. Int J Interact Des Manuf. 2019;13:1385-1399. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  13. Nie W, Gu F, Wang Z, Wu R, Yue Y, Shao A. Preliminary application of three-dimension printing technology in surgical management of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. Injury. 2019;50:476-483. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  14. Smith KE, Dupont KM, Safranski DL, Blair J, Buratti D, Zeetser V, Callahan R, Lin J, Gall K. Use of 3D printed bone plate in novel technique to surgically correct hallux valgus deformities. Tech Orthop. 2016;31:181-189. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...