Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2026; 93(1):22-28 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2025/033

Comparison of MRI of Paraspinal Muscles in Patients after Open and Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Stabilisation of Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Fractures

Tomáš Matějka1, Jiří Matějka1, Jaroslav Zeman1, Jaroslav Belatka1, Martin Salášek1, 2
1 Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma of Locomotive Apparatus, University hospital and Faculty of Medicine in Plzeň, Charles University, Czech Republic
2 New Technologies for Information Society, University of West Bohemia, Plzeň, Czech Republic

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to evaluate paraspinal muscle damage after classic open surgery (OPEN) and minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) after injury. In a randomised prospective study, we evaluated our hypothesis that MISS would result in a lower extent of atrophy and fibrosis as detected by MRI.



MRI was performed after the injury and not earlier than 3 months after the removal of implants. 16 OPEN and 16 MISS patients underwent the final follow-up. Both atrophy and muscle fibrosis were assessed based on the progression of the condition after the surgery from the pre-operative state. Atrophy was assessed using T2-weighted axial scans based on the progression of fat tissue growth in the muscle and muscle tissue regression, while muscle fibrosis was assessed using T1-weighted scans before and after the administration of a contrast agent.



Mean fibrotic changes were found to be higher in the OPEN group than in the MISS group, but insignificantly (p = 0.1100). Muscular atrophy was higher in the MISS group (p = 0.2099).

Occurrence of fibrosis correlated positively with muscular atrophy only in the MISS group (R = 0.617 (0.174-0.852), p = 0.0094).

Minimally invasive percutaneous methods of spinal stabilization and other types of less invasive spinal surgeries are more gentle to the paraspinal muscles than standard OPEN approaches. Their importance is clear despite certain disadvantages such as longer duration of surgery and higher radiation exposure (in case of insertion without robotic assistance or 3D CT guidance). The condition of the paraspinal muscles is more suitable for the follow-up physiotherapy, enabling easier and quicker recovery. In the long term, the muscles are more capable of maintaining spinal balance and allowing for a wider range of movement, despite in this study is a mild controversy in the higher percentage of muscle atrophy in MISS procedures.



MISS procedures are more gentle to the paraspinal muscles than OPEN procedures. The condition of muscles is better for physiotherapy, enabling easier and quicker recovery.

Keywords: spine, fracture, rehabilitation, muscles, minimally invasive spine surgery, magnetic resonance imaging, fibrosis, muscular atrophy.

Received: May 23, 2025; Revised: May 23, 2025; Accepted: August 25, 2025; Published: March 1, 2026  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Matějka T, Matějka J, Zeman J, Belatka J, Salášek M. Comparison of MRI of Paraspinal Muscles in Patients after Open and Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Stabilisation of Thoracic and Lumbar Spine Fractures. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2026;93(1):22-28. doi: 10.55095/achot2025/033.
Download citation

References

  1. Bresnahan LE, Smith JS, Ogden AT, Quinn S, Cybulski GR, Simonian N, Natarajan RN, Fessler RD, Fessler RG. Assessment of paraspinal muscle cross-sectional area after lumbar decompression: minimally invasiveversus open approaches. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30:162-168. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Fan S, Hu Z, Zhao F, Zhao X, Huang Y, Fang X. Multifidus muscle changes and clinical effects of one level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally invasive procedure versus conventional open approach. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:316-324. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Ghiasi MS, Arjmand N, Shirazi-Adl A, Farahmand F, Hashemi H, Bagheri S, Valizadeh M. Cross-sectional area of human trunk paraspinal muscles before and after posterior lumbar surgery using magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Spine J. 2016;25:774-782. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Junhui L, Zhengbao P, Wenbin X, Lu H, Shengyun L, Shunwu F, Fengdong. Comparison of pedicle fixation by the Wiltse approach and the conventional posterior open approach for thoracolumbar fractures, using MRI, histological and electrophysiological analyses of the multifidus muscle. Eur Spine J. 2017;26:1506-1514. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Matějka J, Zeman J, Belatka J, Zeman P, Matějka T. Histochemical and histological changes of paraspinal muscles in patients with thoracic and lumbar spine fractures treated with open and minimally invasive stabilisation. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2019;32:803-810. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Matějka J, Zůchová M, Koudela K. Changes of muscular fibre types in erector spinae and multifidus muscles in the unstable lumbar spine. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2006;19:1-5. Go to original source...
  7. Matějka T, Zeman J, Belatka J, Racek J, Matějka J. Creatin kinase and myoglobin levels as indicator of perioperative muscle damage during open and mini-invasive stabilization of thoracic and lumbar spine fracture, a prospective randomized study. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2020;87:9-16. Go to original source...
  8. Ntilikina Y, Bahlau D, Garnon J, Schuller S, Walter A, Schaeffer M, Steib JP, Charles YP. Open versus percutaneous instrumentation in thoracolumbar fractures: magnetic resonance imaging comparison of paravertebral muscles after implant removal. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;27:235-241. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Pishnamaz M, Oikonomidis M, Knobe K, Horst H-C, Pape H, Kobbe P. Open versus percutaneous stabilization of thoracolumbar spine fractures: A short-term functional and radiological follow-up. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2015;82:274-281. Go to original source...
  10. Pishnamaz M, Schemmann U, Herren Ch, Horst K, Lichte P, Hildebrand F, Pape H, Kobbe P. Muscular changes after minimally invasive versus open spinal stabilization of thoracolumbar fractures: a literature review. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2018;18:62-70.
  11. Tonomura H, Hatta Y, Mikami Y, Ikeda T, Harada T, Nagae M, Koike H, Hase H, Kubo T. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the effects of surgical invasiveness on paravertebral muscles after muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD). Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30:76-82. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Vaccaro AR, Oner C, Kepler CK, Dvorak M, Schnake K, Bellabarba C, Reinhold M, Aarabi B, Kandziora F, Chapman J, Shanmuganathan R, Fehlings M, Vialle L; AOSpine Spinal Cord Injury & Trauma Knowledge Forum. AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38:2028-2037. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Vanek P, Bradac O, Konopkova R, de Lacy P, Lacman J, Benes V. Treatment of thoracolumbar trauma by short-segment percutaneous transpedicular screw instrumentation: prospective comparative study with a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;20:150-156. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Wang HL, Lu FZ, Jiang JY, Ma X, Xia XL, Wang LX. Minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion via MAST Quadrant retractor versus open surgery: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Chin Med J. 2011;124:3868-3874.
  15. Wild MH, Glees M, Plieschnegger C, Wenda K. Five-year follow-up examination after purely minimally invasive posterior stabilization of thoracolumbar fractures: a comparison of minimally invasive percutaneously and conventionally open treated patients. Arch