Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2010; 77(4):320-326 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2010/058

Intra-operative Myelography in Treatment of Fractures of Thoracolumbar SpineOriginal papers

Ľ. TOMČOVČÍK1,*, R. ČUHA1, R. RAŠI2
1 Klinika úrazovej chirurgie FNsP J. A. Reimana a FZ PU, Prešov
2 Klinika úrazovej chirurgie FN L. Pasteura a LF UPJŠ, Košice

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:
The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the results of intra-operative myelography as the method used to assess the reduction of bone fragments from the posterior margin of the vertebral body.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Forty patients with 42 comminuted fractures of the thoracolumbar spine were included in the study. The pre-operative spinal stenosis caused by bone fragments from the posterior margin of the vertebral body, as detected by CT scanning, ranged from 25 % to 85 %. Neurological deficit was due to injury in 19 patients and in one it developed post-operatively after the patient stood and walked.
After ligamentotaxis and internal fixation, intra-operative myelography was used to show decompression of the spinal canal. A spinal block or severe constriction of contrast flow was an indication for hemilaminectomy (laminectomy) and direct decompression of the spinal canal. In the patients with neurological deficit and severe spinal stenosis persisting after ligamentotaxis and detectable by skiascopy, hemilaminectomy (laminectomy) and direct spinal decompression followed by intra-operative myelography were carried out.

RESULTS:
Intra-operative myelography was used 46 -times (20-times in 20 patients free from neurological deficit and 26-times in 20 patients with neurological deficit). In 38 cases (82.6 %) dural sac compression was not present (patients with neurological deficit, 13-times after ligamentotaxis, eight-times after ligamentotaxis and hemilaminectomy with direct decompression, twice at repeat surgery patients without neurological deficit, 15-times). On two occasions (4.4 %) the contrast agent injected into the dural sac did not make the interior body part visible, on three occasions (6.5 %) contrast medium was injected extradurally, and dural sac compression following ligamentotaxis requiring hemilaminectomy (laminectomy) and direct decompression occurred in three cases (6.5 %).
In the patients without neurological deficit, dural sac compression was not recorded. No serious complications associated with contrast medium injection in the dural sac were present, and there was no deterioration of neurological symptoms due to a dural tap.
In three cases (6.5 %) a false negative finding was recorded, showing free flow of contrast medium with no areas of constriction or obstruction and signs of post-operative nerve irritation (radicular syndrome associated with L3 fracture with a fragment placed laterally in two patients and hyperalgesia of the thigh after T12 fracture in one patient). Repeat surgery and additional decompression (hemilaminectomy and foraminotomy, laminectomy) resulted in immediate resolution of neurological symptoms.

DISCUSSION:
The success rate, complications and disadvantages of intra-operative myelography have not been reported. At present, ionic water-soluble contrast agents used for intrathecal administration are associated with only a low number of serious complications. Neurological deficit due to dural tap is rare. Extradural administration is not effective. A disadvantage reported here involves a failure to visualize the area because of a low amount of contrast agent administered to avoid spinal cord injury. A possibility of false negative findings arising from only one lateral view of the contrast agent flowing round fragments is the major disadvantage. In contrast to the previous reports, we relate the false negative findings to neurological findings.

CONCLUSIONS:
Intra-operative myelography is still a currently used method. Its advantages include a simple procedure without removal of posterior column structures, and the possibility of objective recording and continuous observation of the dural sac. The free flow of contrast medium makes obstruction of the spinal canal impossible. The consequences of a false negative finding can be successfully treated at the second stage.

Keywords: intra-operative, myelography, thoracolumbar spine, fractures, surgical treatment

Published: August 1, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
TOMČOVČÍK Ľ, ČUHA R, RAŠI R. Intra-operative Myelography in Treatment of Fractures of Thoracolumbar Spine. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2010;77(4):320-326. doi: 10.55095/achot2010/058. PubMed PMID: 21059330.
Download citation

References

  1. BOERGER, T. O., LIMB, D., DICKSON, R. A.: Does "canal clearance" affect neurological outcome after thoracolumbar burst fractures? J. Bone Jt Surg., 82-B: 629-635, 2000. Go to original source...
  2. BOHLMANN, H. H., KIRKPATRICK, J. S., DELAMARTER, R. B., LEVENTHAL, M.: Anterior decompression for late pain and paralysis after fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. Clin. Orthop., 300: 24-29, 1994. Go to original source...
  3. CANBAY, Ö., NILÜFER, B., AKINCI, S., KANBAK, M., AYPAR, Ü.: Rhabdomyolysis after intraoperative myelography. Pediatric Anesthesia, 14: 509-513, 2004. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. DEGREIF, J., WENDA, K.: Ultrasound-guided spinal fracture repositioning. Surg. Endosc., 12: 164-169, 1998. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. HIERHOLZER, CH., BÜHREN, V., WOLTMANN, A.: Operative Timing and Management of Spinal Injuries in Multiply Injured Patients. Europ. J. Trauma Emerg. Surg., 33: 488-500, 2007. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. KILLEFFER, J. A., KAUFMAN, H. H.: Inadvertent Intraoperative Myelography with Hypaque: Case Report and Discussion. Surg. Neurol., 48: 70-73, 1997. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. KNOP, C., BLAUTH, M., BÜHREN, V., HAX, P. M., KINZL, L., MUTSCHLER, W., POMMER, A., ULRICH, C., WAGNER, S., WECKBACH, A., WENTZENSEN, A., WÖRSDÖRFER, O.: Surgical treatment of injuries of the thoracolumbar transition. 2: Operation and roentgenologic findings. Unfallchirurg, 103: 1032-1047, 2000. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. KOČIŠ, J., WENDSCHE, P., MUŽÍK, V., BILIK, A., VESELÝ, R., ČERNOHOUSOVÁ, I.: Minimálně invazivní torakoskopicky asistovaný transdiafragmatický přístup při ošetřování předního sloupce torakolumbálního přechodu. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 76: 232-238, 2009. Go to original source...
  9. KRBEC, M., ŠTULÍK, J.: Ošetření zlomenin Th-L páteře vnitřním fixatérem (zhodnocení 120 operovaných případů). Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 68: 77-84, 2001.
  10. LAZENNEC, J. Y., SAILLANT, G., HANSEN, S., RAMARE, S.: Intraoperative Ultrasonography Evaluation of Posterior Vertebral Wall Displacement in Thoracolumbar Fractures. Neurol. Med. Chir., 39: 8-15, 1999. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. LERCH, K., VÖLK, M., HEERS, G., BAER, W., NERLICH, M. Ultrasound-guided decompression of the spinal canal in traumatic stenosis. Ultrasound Med. Biol., 28: 27-32, 2002. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. LICINA, P., NOWITZKE, A. M.: Approach and considerations regarding the patient with spinal injury. Injury, 36 (Suppl. 2): B2-B12, 2005. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. LUKÁŠ, R., SUCHOMEL, P., ŠRÁM, J., ENDRYCH, L.: Klasifikací řízená volba operačního přístupu při operačním léčení zlomenin torakolumbární páteře. Rozhl. Chir., 85: 365-372, 2006.
  14. MAGERL, F., AEBI, M., GERTZBEIN, S. D., HARMS, J., NAZARIAN, S.: A Comprehensive Classification of Thoracic and Lumbar Injuries. Europ. Spine J., 3: 184-201, 1994. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. MILITZ, M., GRILLHÖSL, A., JAKSCHE, H., BÜHREN, V.: Neurologic Deficit - a Rare Complication after Intraoperative Myelography. Europ. J. Trauma, 26: 256-260, 2000. Go to original source...
  16. MUELLER, L. A., DEGREIF, J., SCHMIDT, R., PFANDER, D., FORST, R., ROMMENS, P. M., MUELLER, L. P., RUDIG, L.: Ultrasound - Guided Spinal Fracture Repositioning, Ligamentotaxis, and Remodeling After Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures. Spine, 31: E739-E746, 2006. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. NOTHOFER, W., NEUGEBAUER, R.: Aktuelles diagnostisches Vorgehen bei Verletzungen der Brust - und Lendenwirbelsäule. Trauma Berufskrankh., 2 (Suppl. 2): S236-S240, 2000. Go to original source...
  18. RUSSE, O., BOETEL, U., BIERBACH, A.: Intraoperative Myelographie, prä- und postoperative CT. Vergleich der Wertigkeit bei der Sofort - und Frühversorgung instabiler Brüche der BWS und LWS. Hefte Unfallheilkd., 220: 175-182, 1991. Go to original source...
  19. SANDOW, B. A., DONNAL, J. F.: Myelography Complications and Current Practice Patterns. Amer. J. Roentgenol., 185: 768-771, 2005. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. SCHLICKEWEI, W., KUNER, E. H.: Verbesserte Interpretation der intraoperativen Myelographie bei dorsaler Wirbelsäuleninstrumentierung. Unfallchirurgie, 18: 182-185, 1992. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. SKALPE, I. O., BONNEVILLE, J. F., GRANE, P., GYLDENSTEDT, C., OTTO, B., KRISTOFFERSEN, D. T., SVALAND, M. G.: Myelography with a dimeric (iodixanol) and monomeric (iohexol) contrast medium: a clinical multicentre comparative study. Europ. Radiol., 8: 1054-1057, 1998. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. ŠTULÍK, J., KRBEC, M., VYSKOČIL, T.: Použití biokeramiky při ošetřování zlomenin TL páteře. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 69: 288-294, 2002.
  23. ŠEBESTA, P., ŠTULÍK, J., VYSKOČIL, T., KRYL, J.: Zadní stabilizace tříštivých zlomenin L5 bez ošetření předního sloupce. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 75: 123-128, 2008. Go to original source...
  24. ŠEBESTA, P., ŠTULÍK, J., VYSKOČIL, T., KRYL, J.: Syndrom kaudy po elektivním výkonu na bederní páteři. Acta Chir. orthop. Traum. čech., 76: 505-508, 2009. Go to original source...