Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2020; 87(2):75-81 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2020/012
Clinical Outcomes after Total Knee Replacement in Dependence on Femoral Component Rotation Relative to the Original Anatomy of Distal FemurOriginal papers
- 1 Ortopedicko-traumatologické oddělení, Nemocnice Znojmo
- 2 Klinika traumatologie, Lékařská fakulta, Masarykova univerzita, Brno
- 3 Oddělení fyzioterapie, Katedra podpory zdraví, Fakulta sportovních studií, Masarykova univerzita, Brno
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:
The number of patients who underwent total knee replacement is on an increase globally. According to the current literature, 10-30% of patients is dissatisfied with the outcome of surgery. The purpose of this study was to focus on preoperative planning of femoral components position relative to the original anatomy and to find out how it affects the satisfaction of patients after the surgery.
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
A total of 74 total knee replacements were examined at the authors' department one year after the surgery in order to determine the function of knee replacement. The patients underwent a preoperative and postoperative CT scan of the knee joint in order to determine the rotation of the dorsal line of femoral condyles relative to the transepicondylar line, the so-called condylar twist angle (CTA). The study did not explore the absolute value of CTA, but the difference between the preoperative and postoperative angle. The patients were divided into two groups. In Group 1 composed of 53 knees, the difference of the CTA was lower than 3°, Group 2 included the cases with the difference greater than 3°. After 1 year, the patients filled in the Knee Society Clinical Rating Score and WOMAC questionnaires. The statistical significance was evaluated with the use of the unpaired T-test.
RESULTS:
Group 1 where the original anatomy of the knee joint was respected, reported the mean value of Part 1 of the KSCRS of 83.5 points, the mean value of Part 2 of this questionnaire was 83.5 points. The mean WOMAC score was 86.4 and the mean VAS score was 2.6. In Group 2, with a difference in rotation as against the preoperative status of 3° or more, the mean value of Part 1 and Part 2 of the KSRCS was 72.4 points and 72.1 points, respectively, the mean WOMAC score was 75.5 points and the mean VAS score was 4.7. The comparison by the Student's t-test, in all the monitored values at the level of significance of p < 0.05 the patients' satisfaction and the implant's function depend on respecting the original anatomy of the distal femur.
DISCUSSION:
It is generally accepted that the internal rotation of the femoral component causes patellar hyperpression, thus reduces the satisfaction of patients. There are several ways how to determine the rotation of the femoral component. An error is inherent in all of them, inversely proportional to the surgeon's experience. The purpose of our study was to show that in case of appropriately selected preoperative planning the postoperative outcome and the patients' satisfaction can improve.
CONCLUSIONS:
Our study confirms that for the patient's satisfaction after total knee replacement it is fitting to perform preoperative planning regarding the rotation of the femoral component and to seek to maintain the original anatomy, even if the femoral component is implanted in slight internal rotation.
Keywords: rotation of the femoral component, total knee replacement, condylar twist angle, preoperative planning
Published: April 1, 2020 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- Aglietti P, Sensi L, Cuomo P, Ciardullo A. Rotational position of femoral and tibial components in TKA using the femoral transepicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2751-2755.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Baker PN, van der Meulen JH, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ; National Joint Registry for England and Wales. The role of pain and function in determining patient satisfaction after total knee replacement. Data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:893-900.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:144-153.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, Mahomed NN, Charron KD. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty:who is satisfied and who is not?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:57-63.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Castelli CC, Falvo DA, Lapicca ML, Gotti V. Rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4:4.
Go to PubMed...
- Franceschini V, Nodzo SR, Gonzalez Della Valle A. Femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty:a comparison between transepicondylar axis and posterior condylar line referencing. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:2917-2921.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Gromov K, Korchi M, Thomsen MG, Husted H, Troelsen A. What is the optimal alignment of the tibial and femoral components in knee arthroplasty?:An overview of the literature. Acta Orthop. 2014;85:480-487.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Haritinian EG, Pimpalnerkar AL. Computer assisted total knee arthroplasty:does it make a difference? Maedica (Buchar). 2013;8:176-181.
Go to PubMed...
- Chauhan SK, Clark GW, Lloyd S, Scott RG, Breidahl W, Sikorski JM. Computer - assisted total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;86:818-823.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Jenny JY, Boeri C. Low reproducibility of the intra-operative measurement of the transepicondylar axis during total knee replacement. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:74-77.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Kanekasu K, Kondo M, Kadoya Y. Axial radiography of the distal femur to assess rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2005;434:193-197
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Kobayashi H, Aratake M, Akamatsu Y, Mitsugi N, Taki N, Saito T, Reproducibility of condylar twist angle measurement using computed tomography and axial radiography of the distal femur. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100:885-890.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Koudela K jr, Koudelová J, Koudela K sr, Kormunda S, Křen J, Pokorný J. Komparace a statistické zhodnocení dvou metod měření "condylar twist angle" u aloplastiky kolenního kloubu. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2012;79:324-330.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Koudela K Jr, Koudela K Sr, Koudelová J, Kormunda S, Křen J, Pokorný J. Srovnání výskytu patelární bolesti po aloplastice kolenního kloubu u konvenčně nebo individuálně nastavené rotace femorální komponenty. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2012;79:416-421.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Lau E, Widmer M, Maravic M, Gómez-Barrena E, de Pina Mde F, Manno V, Torre M, Walter WL, de Steiger R, Geesink RG, Peltola M, Röder C. International survey of primary and revision total knee replacement. International Orthopaedics. 2011;35:1783-1789.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Loą»ák J, Gallo J, Zapletalová J. Patient satisfaction after total knnee arthroplasty. Analysis of pre-operative and peri-operative parameters influencing results in 826 patients. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2016;83:94-101
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Ma HM, Lu YC, Kwok TG, Ho FY, Huang CY, Huang CH. The effect of the design of the femoral component on the conformity of the patellofemoral joint in total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:408-412.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Mandalia V, Eyres K, Schranz P, Toms AD. Evaluation of patients with a painful total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:265-271.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Matsuda S, Ito H. Ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty - Medial stabilizing technique. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2015;2:108-113.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Middleton FR, Palmer SH. How accurate is Whiteside's line as a reference axis in total knee arthroplasty?. Knee. 2007;14:204-207.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Miller MC, Berger RA, Petrella AJ, Karmas A, Rubash HE. Optimizing femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:38-45.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Olcott CW, Scott RD. A comparison of 4 intraoperative methods to determine femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:22-26.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Puolakka PA, Rorarius MG, Roviola M, Puolakka TJ, Nordhausen K, Lindgren L. Persistent pain following knee arthroplasty. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27:455-460.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Scott RD. Femoral and tibial component rotation in total knee arthroplasty:methods and consequences. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B(11 Suppl A):140-143.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Whiteside L, Arima J. The anteroposterior axis for femoral rotational alignment in valgus total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;321:168-172.
Go to original source...