Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2021; 88(6):461-463 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2021/069

Unexpected Finding of a Foreign Body in the Knee Joint Area of a 10-Year-Old BoyCase report

M. HANUS*, V. HLADKÝ
Klinika dětské a dospělé ortopedie a traumatologie, 2. lékařská fakulta Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice v Motole, Praha

Differential diagnosis of tumor processes in orthopedics is a relatively broad and inherently very serious issue, especially if the patients are pediatric patients. A number of examination procedures is used in diagnostics, together with a wide range of complementary laboratory and imaging methods. However, the clinical examination, including the collected anamnestic data, remains to be the cornerstone. In pediatric patients, of major importance is the cooperation with parents, but not always necessary information is provided to make the final diagnosis. In younger children, it is very often impossible to obtain relevant anamnestic data due to a number of factors that are typical for pediatric patients, namely fear, noncooperation, misunderstanding of questions, mainly as a result of mental immaturity. Therefore, diagnosis in these cases is based primarily on clinical and complementary findings.
This work presents a complex issue of this diagnosis, with a surprising and unexpected finding of a foreign body in the knee joint of a pediatric patient, which completely changed the subsequent treatment strategy. It concerned a 10-year-old boy referred to our clinic from another workplace for suspected tumor process in the knee joint. The whole process of examination and final diagnosis depends on a number of detailed information that we have tried to obtain throughout the process.

Keywords: tumor, knee, foreign body, diagnostics, imaging methods

Published: December 15, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
HANUS M, HLADKÝ V. Unexpected Finding of a Foreign Body in the Knee Joint Area of a 10-Year-Old Boy. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2021;88(6):461-463. doi: 10.55095/achot2021/069. PubMed PMID: 34998451.
Download citation

References

  1. Barták V, Krátký Z, Popelka S ml. Tumoru podobná afekce přednoží na podkladě retence dřevěného párátka. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2014;81:152-154. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Fleming ME, Heiner JD, Summers S, April MD, Chin, EJ. Diagnostic accuracy of emergency bedside ultrasonography to detect cutaneous wooden foreign bodies: does size matter?. J Spec Oper Med. 2017;17:72-75. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Ingraham CR, Manelli L, Robinson JD, Linnau KF. Radiology of foreign bodies: how do we image them?. Emerg Radiol. 2015;22:425-430. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Javadrashid R, Fouladi DF, Golamian M, Hajalioghli P, Daghighi MH, Shahmorady Z, Niknejad MT. Visibility of diferent foreign bodies in the maxillofacial region using plain radiography, CT, MRI and ultrasonography: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44:20140229. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Siegel IM. Identification of non-metallic foreign bodies in soft tissue: Eikinella corrodens metatarsal osteomyelitis due to a retained toothpick. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:1408-1410. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Thacker MM. Malignant soft tissue tumors in children. Orthop Clin North Am. 2013;44:657-667. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Vaiman M, Lazarovich T, Lotan G. Pantoea agglomerans as an indicator of a foreign body of plant origin in cases of wound infection. J Wound Care. 2013;22:182,184-185. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Venter NG, Jamel N, Marques RG, Djahjah E, Mendonca LS. Evaluation of radiological methods for detection of wood foreign body in animal model. Acta Cir Bras. 2005;20 (Suppl. 1):34-41. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...