Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2022; 89(4):300-308 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2022/048

Surgical Treatment of Sacral ChordomaOriginal papers

J. VČELÁK1,*, J. LESENSKÝ1, A. ©PELDOVÁ1, M. MACKO2
1 Ortopedická klinika 1. Lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a IPVZ, Fakultní nemocnice Na Bulovce, Praha
2 Ortopedické oddělení, Klaudiánova nemocnice, Oblastní nemocnice Mladá Boleslav

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:
The retrospective study of patients treated for sacral chordoma with respect of complications, clinical outcomes and long-term survival is presented. Three main hypotheses have been formulated. Hypothesis 1: survival of patients with respect to generalization of the disease, manifestation of local recurrence and metastases with a R0 resection margin achieved is longer than survival of patients with a R1 or R2 resection margin. Hypothesis 2: survival of patients with the tumor resected from low endplate of S2 distally is longer than in tumors with resection above this level. Hypothesis 3: resection of large tumors with tumor volume greater than 800 cm3 is associated with a significantly shorter survival than resection of tumors with tumor volume less than 800 cm3.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:
A total of 12 patients (7 women, 5 men), with the mean age of 54.3 years, underwent surgical treatment at our department in 1998-2018. Sacral chordoma proximally achieved S1 level in three cases, S2 level in four cases and S3 level in five cases with volume less than 800 cm3 in eight and greater in four patients. In nine patients sacrectomy using isolated posterior approach was performed and in three patients antero-posterior approach was applied. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve was calculated to estimate the survival of patients. The patients were divided into groups and subsequently compared with respect of achieved radicality of surgical resection, i.e. R0 vs. R1 or R2 resection, secondly of the proximal margin of the tumor/resection, i.e. S1 or S2 vs. S3 distally, and thirdly of the volume of the tumor, i.e. less than 800 cm3 vs. more than 800 cm3.

RESULTS:
At the time of evaluation, a total of seven patients were alive (58.3%), with the mean survival of 9.5 years. One patient died from complications associated with the treatment of obstructive ileus manifested 10 months after primary surgery. The remaining four patients died in relation to the generalization of the disease 14.8 years after primary surgery on average. All the patients, in whom R0 resection was achieved, at the average time of evaluation of 7.3 years (range 2.8-15.8 years) showed no signs of local recurrence or generalization of the disease, whereas in group with R1, R2 resection at the time of evaluation only two patients were still alive, both 16.8 years on average (range 15.2-18.4 years) after surgery with repeatedly treated recurrencies. Frequent postoperative complications were observed in a total of five patients (41.7%).

DISCUSSION:
The study did not confirm any difference in patient's survival with respect of the proximal margin affection of sacrum or tumor size. The decisive factor for survival of patients with sacral chordoma is achieving the R0 resection. The size of the chordoma and proximal achievement increase the complexity of surgery, manifestation of early perioperative and subsequently postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS:
In primary surgical treatment of sacral chordoma, we always try to achieve R0 resection. In the case of low-volume tumors from S3 distally, we resect the tumor using the isolated posterior approach. The anterior-posterior approach is preferred in the case of large tumors presenting in the S1/2 region.

Keywords: sacral chordoma, sacral cancer, wide resection, sacrectomy, vertical rectus abdominus myocutaneous (VRAM) flap

Published: August 15, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
VČELÁK J, LESENSKÝ J, ©PELDOVÁ A, MACKO M. Surgical Treatment of Sacral Chordoma. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2022;89(4):300-308. doi: 10.55095/achot2022/048. PubMed PMID: 36055671.
Download citation

References

  1. Asavamongkolkul A, Waikakul S. Wide resection of sacral chordoma via a posterior approach. Int Orthop. (SICOT). 2012;36:607-612. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Bergh P, Kindblom LG, Gunterberg B, Remotti F, Ryd W, Meis-Kindblom JM. Prognostic factors in chordoma of the sacrum and mobile spine:a study of 39 patients. Cancer. 2000;88:2122-2134. Go to original source...
  3. Dasenbrock HH, Clarke MJ, Bydon A, McGirt MJ, Witham TF, Sciubba DM, Gokaslan ZL, Wolinsky JP. En bloc resection of sacral chordomas aided by frameless stereotactic image guidance: a technical note. Neurosurgery. 2012;70(Suppl 1):ons82-ons88. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Dhawale AA, Gjolaj JP, Holmes L, Sands LR, Temple T, Eismont FJ. Sacrectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy for the treatment of sacral chordomas. a single-center experience over 27 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39:E353-E359. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Dubory A, Missenard G, Court C, Late local recurrence, at 19 and 17 years, of sacral chordoma treated by en bloc resection. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research. 2016;102:121-125. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Dubory A, Missenard G, Lampbert B, Court Ch. "En bloc" resection of sacral chordomas by combined anterior and posterior surgical approach: a monocentric retrospective review about 29 cases. Eur Spine J. 2014;23:1940-1948. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Efetov SK, Picciariello A, Kochetkov VS, Puzakov KB, Alekberzade AV, Tulina IA, Tsarkov PV. Surgical Treatment of Sacral Chordoma: The Role of Laparoscopy. Case Rep Oncol. 2020;13:255-260. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Gunterberg B, Kewenter J, Petersen I, Stener B. Anorectal function after major resections of the sacrum with bilateral or unilateral sacrifice of sacral nerves. Br J Surg. 1976;63:546-554. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Hulen CA, Temple HT, Fox WP. Oncologic and functional outcome following sacrectomy for sacral chordoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1532-1539. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Ji T, Guo W, Rongli Y, Tang X, Wang Y, Huang L. What Are the Conditional and Functional Outcomes After Surgical Treatment of 115 Patients With Sacral Chordoma? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475:620-630. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Kashlan ON, Monson DK, Refai D. The Use of Anterior Lumbosacral Interbody Fusion in Spinopelvic Stabilisation After High Partial Sacrectomy. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2019;17:E173-E176. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Kayani B, Sewell H, Saifuddin A, Molloy S, Brix TWR.. A review of the surgical management of sacral chordoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014;40:1412-1420. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Kim JE, Pang JP, Christensen JM, Coon D, Zadnik PL, Wolinsky JP, Gokaslan ZL, Bydon A, Sciubba DM, Witham T, Redett RJ, Sacks JM. Soft-tissue reconstruction after total en bloc sacrectomy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;22:571581. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Kurup AN, Woodrum DA, Morris JM, Atwell TD, Schmit GD, Welch TJ, Yaszemski MJ, Callstrom MR. Cryoablation of recurrent sacrococcygeal tumors. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23:1070-1075. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Li L, Jiang XF, Sun LJ, Fu YF, Zhang W. Computed tomography-guided argon-helium cryoablation for sacrum chordoma. Medicine. 2020;99:42. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Miyamoto S, Arikawa M, Fujiki M, Kawai A, Kobayashi E, Sakuraba M. The superior rektal artery as a recipient vessel for free flap transfer after partial sacrectomy in patients with chordoma. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;76:315-317. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Moojen WA, Vleggeert-Lankamp C, Krol A. Long-term results. Adjuvant radiotherapy in en-bloc resection of sacrococcygeal chordoma is advisable. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36:E656-E661. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Radaelli S, Fossati P, Stacchiotti S, Akiyama T, Asencio JM, Bandiera S, Boglione A, Boland P, Bolle S, Bruland Ø, Brunello A, Bruzzi P, Campanacci D, Cananzi F, Capanna R, Casadei R, Cordoba A, Court C, Dei Tos AP, DeLaney TF, De Paoli A, De Pas TM, Desai A, Di Brina L, Donati DM, Fabbri N, Fiore MR, Frezza A, Gambarotti M, Gasbarrini A, Georg P, Grignani G, Hindi N, Hug EB, Jones R, Kawai A, Krol AD, Le Grange F, Luzzati A, Marquina G, Martin-Benlloch JA, Mazzocco K, Navarria F, Navarria P, Parchi PD, Patel S, Pennacchioli E, Petrongari MG, Picci P, Pollock R, Porcu L, Quagliuolo V, Sangalli C, Scheipl S, Scotto GM, Spalek M, Steinmeier T, Timmermann B, Trama A, Uhl M, Valverde C, Varga PP, Verges R, Weber DC, Zoccali C, Casali PG, Sommer J, Gronchi A. The sacral chordoma margin. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46:1415-1422. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Radaelli S, Stacchiotti S, Ruggieri P, Donati D, Casali PG, Palmerini E, Collini P, Gambarotti M, Porcu L, Boriani S, Gronchi A, Picci P. Sacral chordoma: long-term outcome of a large series of patients surgically treated at two reference centers. Spine. 2016;41(12):1049-1057. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Ruosi C, Colella G, Di Donato SL, Granata F, Di Salvatore MG, Faziolli F. Surgical treatment of sacral chordoma and prognostic factors. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(Suppl):S912-917. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Saigal R, Lu DC, Deng DY, Chou D. Conversion of high sacral to midsacral amputation via S-2 nerve preservation during partial S-2 sacrectomy for chordoma. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;20:421-429. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Schwab JH, Healey JH, Rose P. The surgical management of sacral chordomas. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34:2700-2704. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Stacchiotti S, Sommer J. Building a global consensus approach to chordoma: a position paper from the medical and patient community. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:e71-e83. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. ©tulik J, Hoch J, Richtr P, Kříľ J, Přikryl P, Kryl J. Hemikorporektomie jako nejvyąąí stupeň en bloc resekce sakra. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2020;87:52-57. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Van Wulfften Palthe ODR, Houdek MT, Rose PS, Yaszemski MJ, Sim FH, Boland PJ, Healey JH, Hornicek FJ, Schwab JH. How Does the Level of Nerve Root Resection in En Bloc Sacrectomy Influence Patient-Reported Outcomes? Clin Orthop Realt Res. 2017;475:607-616. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Varga PP, Szoverfi Z, Fisher ChG, Boriani S, Gokaslan ZL, Dekutoski MB, Chou D, Quraishi NA, Reynolds JJ, Luzzati A, Williams R, Fehlings MG, Germscheid NM, Lazary A, Rhines LD. Surgical treatment of sacral chordoma: prognostic variables for local recurrence and overal survival. Eur Spine J. 2015;24:1092-1101. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Wright Ch, Wright J, Cioffi G, Hdeib A, Kasliwal MK, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Sloan AE. Association of cancer center type with tratment patterns and overal survival for patients with sacral and spinal chordomas: an analysis of the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2015. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020;32:311-320. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Yamazaki T, McLoughlin GS, Patel S, Rhines LD, Fourney DR. Feasibility and safety of en bloc resection for primary spine tumors: a systematic review by the Spine Oncology Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(22 Suppl):S31-S38. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Yang Y, Li Y, Zhang Q, Niu X. A case-control study of computer navigation assisted resection of primary sacral chordoma above sacrum 3 level. J Bone Oncol. 2020;23:100303. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Yang Y, Xiaohui N, Li Y, Liu W, Xu H. Recurrence and survival factors analysis of 171 cases of sacral chordoma in a single institute. Eur Spine J. 2017;26:1910-1916. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Zang J, Guo W, Yang R, Tang X, Li D. Is total en bloc sacrectomy using a posterior-only approach feasible and safe for patients with malignant sacral tumors? J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;22:563-570. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...