Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2022; 89(5):332-338 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2022/053
Mid-Term Results of Unicompartmental Knee Replacement Using Oxford Phase III SystemOriginal papers
- I. ortopedická klinika Fakultní nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brně, Lékařská fakulta Masarykovy univerzity, Brno
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:
Partial knee replacement appears to be an appropriate surgical solution of unicompartmental knee joint osteoarthritis in correctly indicated cases. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of unicondylar knee replacement using the Oxford Phase III system in the group of patients treated by the First Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Anne s University Hospital Brno.
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
The prospective study evaluated 47 patients (in 4 patients bilaterally) after the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement performed between 2011 and 2016. The patients were evaluated using the Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and radiological examination performed at 7.3 years after surgery on average. All the patients were operated on by the same surgeon.
RESULTS:
Based on the questionnaires and the clinical examination, the clinical and functional status was assessed, using the Knee Society Score (KSS). The mean preoperative KSS and FS values were 59.8 and 56.5, respectively. The postoperative KSS and FS values were 91.2 and 83.4. The mean preoperative value of the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) was 27.3. Postoperatively the values reached 40.7 on average. Based on the radiological examination, the lower limb correction of axis in the frontal plane was assessed. The mean axis correction was 3.1°. The mean tibial component slope measured on lateral radiograph was 82.7°. The basic analysis of X-rays did not reveal any component malposition. The implant survival rate was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier cumulative survival curve. In our group of patients, the mean survival rate of Oxford Phase III unicondylar knee replacement at 7.3 years postoperatively is 98.0%.
DISCUSSION:
Many studies have reported excellent results of unicondylar knee replacement and a long survival rate of over 90%. Still debated, however, are the indication criteria and also the importance of the surgeon s experience and mastery of the surgical technique.
CONCLUSIONS:
The results of the study confirm our excellent clinical experience and the survival rate of 98% at the mean follow up of 7.3 years after surgery shows great promise for quality long-term results. Overall, crucial for the success of UKR continues to be the compliance with the indication criteria for surgery. The choice of the type of implant and, last but not least, the correct surgical technique and postoperative rehabilitation programme are also important.
Keywords: unicompartmental knee replacement, Oxford Phase III, osteoarthritis of the knee
Published: October 15, 2022 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- Alnachoukati OK, Barrington JW, Berend KR, Kolczun MC, Emerson RH, Lombardi AV, Mauerhan DR. Eight hundred twenty-five medial mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasties: the first 10-year US multi-center survival analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:677-683.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Baker P, Jameson S, Critchley R, Reed M, Gregg P, Deehan D. Center and surgeon volume influence the revision rate following unicondylar knee replacement: an analysis of 23,400 medial cemented unicondylar knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:702-790.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Brown NM, Sheth NP, Davis K, Berend ME, Lombardi AV, Berend KR, Della Valle CJ. Total knee arthroplasty has higher postoperative morbidity than unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a multicenter analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(Suppl 8):86-90.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Buechel FF. Long-Term Followup After Mobile-Bearing Total knee replacement: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:40-50.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Burger JA, Kleeblad LJ, Sierevelt IN, Horstmann WG, van Geenen RCI, van Steenbergen LN, Nolte PA. A comprehensive evaluation of lateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty short to mid-term survivorship, and the effect of patient and implant characteristics: an analysis of data from the dutch arthroplasty register. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35:1813-1818.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Campi S, Kendrick BJL, Kaptein BL, Valstar ER, Jackson WFM, Dodd CAF, et al. Five-year results of a randomised controlled trial comparing cemented and cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement using radiostereometric analysis. The Knee. 2021;28:383-90.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Campi S, Pandit H, Hooper G, Snell D, Jenkins C, Dodd CAF, Maxwell R, Murray DW. Ten-year survival and seven-year functional results of cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee. 2018;25:1231-1237.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Clement ND, Duckworth AD, MacKenzie SP, Nie YX, Tiemessen CH. Medium-term results of Oxford Phase-3 medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2012;20:157-161.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Deshmukh RV, Scott RD. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty long-term results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;392:272-278.
Go to original source...
- Ernstbrunner L, Imam MA, Andronic O, Perz T, Wieser K, Fucentese SF. Lateral unicompartmental knee replacement: a systematic review of reasons for failure. Int Orthop. 2018;42:1827-1833.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Fisher DA, Watts M, Davis KE. Implant position in knee surgery. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:2-8.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Kim S-J, Postigo R, Koo S, Kim JH. Causes of revision following Oxford Phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22:1895-1901.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Kubát P, Ptáček Z. Biomechanical parameters and clinical outcomes of the Oxford Phase III unicompartmental knee replacement. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2011;78:367-372.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Kuipers BM, Kollen BJ, Kaijser Bots PC, Burger BJ, van Raay JJAM, Tulp NJA, Verheyen CC. Factors associated with reduced early survival in the Oxford phase III medial unicompartment knee replacement. Knee. 2010;17:48-52.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Lewold S, Goodman S, Knutson K, Robertson O, Lidgren L. Oxford meniscal bearing knee versus the Marmor knee in unicompartmental arthroplasty for arthrosis. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:722-731.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Lustig S, Barba N, Magnussen RA, Servien E, Demey G, Neyret P. The effect of gender on outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2012;19:176-179.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Mohammad HR, Bullock GS, Kennedy JA, Mellon SJ, Murray D, Judge A. Cementless unicompartmental knee replacement achieves better ten-year clinical outcomes than cemented: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29:3229-3245.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:983-989.
Go to original source...
- Nachtnebl L, Tomaš T, Moster R. Navigovaná unikompartmentální náhrada kolenního kloubu. Ortopedie. 2007;1:121-128.
- Pandit HG, Campi S, Hamilton TW, Dada OD, Pollalis S, Jenkins C, Dodd CAF, Murray DW. Five-year experience of cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25:694-702.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Pandit H, Jenkins C, Barker K, Dodd CAF, Murray DW. The Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement using a minimally-invasive approach. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:54-60.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Price AJ, Webb J, Topf H, Dodd CAF, Goodfellow JW, Murray DW. Rapid recovery after Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:970-976.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Riebel GD, Werner FW, Ayers DC, Bromka J, Murray DG. Early failure of the femoral component in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:615-621.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Seyfettinoğlu F, Bulut M, Karaali E, Oğur HU, Çiçek H, Tuhanioğlu Ü, Çiloğlu O. Does obesity have an effect on the outcomes of unicondylar knee arthroplasty in patients with isolated medial gonarthrosis? Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2021;88:302-306.
Go to PubMed...
- Svärd UCG, Price AJ. Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:191-194.
Go to original source...
- Walker T, Hetto P, Bruckner T, Gotterbarm T, Merle C, Panzram B, Innmann MM, Moradi B. Minimally invasive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty ensures excellent functional outcome and high survivorship in the long term. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27:1658-1664.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- W-Dahl A, Robertsson O, Lidgren L, Miller L, Davidson D, Graves S. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients aged less than 65: combined data from the Australian and Swedish Knee Registries. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:90-94.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...