Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2023; 90(2):124-132 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2023/017

Modified Harrington Procedure in the Treatment of Extensive Tumor Defects of the AcetabulumOriginal papers

J. LESENSKÝ*, O. BLECHA, J. VČELÁK
Ortopedická klinika 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Institut postgraduálního vzdělávání ve zdravotnictví, Fakultní nemocnice Na Bulovce, Praha

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:
The increasing prevalance of patients with metastatic bone cancer and their improved survival puts more emphasis on the quality of treatment of bone metastases. Although most pelvic lesions are treated non-operatively, extensive destruction of the acetabular segment poses a therapeutic challenge. A potential treatment option may be the modified Harrington procedure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS:
At our department, this surgical procedure has been opted for in 14 patients (5 men and 9 women) since 2018. The mean age at the time of surgery was 59 years (range 42 to 73). Twelve patients suffered from metastatic cancer, one patient had a fibrosarcoma metastasis and one female patient presented with aggressive pseudotumor. Radiological and clinical follow-up of the patients was performed. Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale, and the Harris Hip Score and the MSTS score were used to evaluate the functional outcome. The paired samples Wilcoxon test was used to analyze the statistical significance of the difference.

RESULTS:
The mean follow-up period was 25 months. At the time of assessment, ten patients were alive with the mean follow-up of 29 months (range 2 to 54 months) and four patients had died of cancer progression, with the mean follow-up being 16 months. No perioperative death or mechanical failure were reported. One female patient developed a hematogenous infection during febrile neutropenia, which was successfully managed with early revision and implant preservation. Statistically, a significant improvement in the MSTS (median 23) and HHS (median 86) functional scores compared to the preoperative values (MSTS median 2, p<0.01, r-effect size = 0.6; HHS preop median 0, p<0.005, r-effect size = -0.7) was observed. There was also a statistically significant reduction in pain (VAS postoperative median 1, VAS preoperative median 8, p<0.01, r-effect size = -0.6). All patients were capable of independent ambulation after the surgery, nine patients walked without support.

DISCUSSION:
There are not many alternatives to this surgical procedure. Apart from non-operative palliative treatment, the options include ice cream cone prostheses or customized 3D implants which are, impractical in terms of time and cost. Our results are comparable to other studies, confirming the reproducibility and reliability of the method.

CONCLUSIONS:
The Harrington procedure is an efective method for management of large acetabular tumor defects with good functional outcomes, an acceptable perioperative risk and a low risk of failure in the medium term, thus suitable also for patients with good cancer prognosis.

Keywords: tumor, metastasis, acetabulum, pelvis, Harrington, reconstruction

Published: April 1, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
LESENSKÝ J, BLECHA O, VČELÁK J. Modified Harrington Procedure in the Treatment of Extensive Tumor Defects of the Acetabulum. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2023;90(2):124-132. doi: 10.55095/achot2023/017. PubMed PMID: 37156001.
Download citation

References

  1. Agarwal MG, Gundavda MK, Gupta R, Reddy R. Does extracorporeal irradiation and reimplantation after acetabular resections result in adequate hip function? A preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476:1738-1748. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Angelini A, Trovarelli G, Berizzi A, Pala E, Breda A, Ruggieri P. Three-dimension-printed custom-made prosthetic reconstructions: from revision surgery to oncologic reconstructions. Int Orthop. 2019;43:123-132. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Benhabib H, Meirovich H, David E. Evolving role of minimally invasive techniques in the management of symptomatic bone metastases. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2021;15:91-98. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Bernthal NM, Price SL, Monument MJ, Wilkinson B, Jones KB, Randall RL. Outcomes of modified Harrington reconstructions for nonprimary periacetabular tumors: an effective and inexpensive technique. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3921-3928. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Bus MP, Szafranski A, Sellevold S, Goryn T, Jutte PC, Bramer JA, Fiocco M, Streitbürger A, Kotrych D, van de Sande MA, Dijkstra PD. LUMiC® endoprosthetic reconstruction after periacetabular tumor resection: short-term results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475:686-695. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Coleman RE. Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(20 Pt 2):6243s-6249s. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Cottias P, Jeanrot C, Vinh TS, Tomeno B, Anract P. Complications and functional evaluation of 17 saddle prostheses for resection of periacetabular tumors. J Surg Oncol. 2001;78:90-100. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Coupal TM, Pennycooke K, Mallinson PI, Ouellette HA, Clarkson PW, Hawley P, Munk PL. The hopeless case? Palliative cryoablation and cementoplasty procedures for palliation of large pelvic bone metastases. Pain Physician. 2017;20:E1053-E1061. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Dillekås H, Rogers MS, Straume O. Are 90% of deaths from cancer caused by metastases?. Cancer Med. 2019;8:5574-5576. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Erol B, Sofulu O, Sirin E, Saglam F, Buyuktopcu O. Reconstruction after periacetabular tumor resection with Lumic® endoprosthesis: what are the midterm results?. J Surg Oncol. 2021;123:532-543. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Fujiwara T, Stevenson J, Parry M, Le Nail LR, Tsuda Y, Grimer R, Jeys L. Pelvic reconstruction using an ice-cream cone prosthesis: correlation between the inserted length of the coned stem and surgical outcome. Int J Clin Oncol. 2021;26:1139-1146. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Guo W, Li D, Tang X, Yang Y, Ji T. Reconstruction with modular hemipelvic prostheses for periacetabular tumor. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;461:180-188. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Harrington KD. Orthopedic surgical management of skeletal complications of malignancy. Cancer. 1997;80(8 Suppl):1614-1627. Go to original source...
  14. Hegde V, Bernthal NM. Metastatic bone disease: pelvis. In: Metastatic bone disease. Springer, New York, NY. 2006, pp 267-277. Go to original source...
  15. Ho L, Ahlmann ER, Menendez LR. Modified Harrington reconstruction for advanced periacetabular metastatic disease. J Surg Oncol. 2010;101:170-174. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Kakhki VR, Anvari K, Sadeghi R, Mahmoudian AS, Torabian-Kakhki M. Pattern and distribution of bone metastases in common malignant tumors. Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur. 2013;16:66-69. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Kask G, Nieminen J, van Iterson V, Naboistsikov M, Pakarinen TK, Laitinen MK. Modified Harrington's procedure for periacetabular metastases in 89 cases: a reliable method for cancer patients with good functional outcome, especially with long expected survival. Acta Orthop. 2020;91:341-346. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Lesenský J, Mavrogenis AF. Cement intercalary reconstruction after bone tumor resection. Orthopedics. 2021;44:e593-e599. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Liang H, Ji T, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Guo W. Reconstruction with 3D-printed pelvic endoprostheses after resection of a pelvic tumour. Bone Joint J. 2017;99-B:267-275. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Müller DA, Capanna R. The surgical treatment of pelvic bone metastases. Adv Orthop. 2015;2015:525363. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Nilsson J, Gustafson P, Fornander P, Ornstein E. The Harrington reconstruction for advanced periacetabular metastatic destruction: good outcome in 32 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:591-596. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Santucci C, Carioli G, Bertuccio P, Malvezzi M, Pastorino U, Boffetta P, Negri E, Bosetti C, La Vecchia C. Progress in cancer mortality, incidence, and survival: a global overview. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2020;29:367-381. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Sing SL, An J, Yeong WY, Wiria FE. Laser and electron-beam powder-bed additive manufacturing of metallic implants: A review on processes, materials and designs. J Orthop Res. 2016;34:369-385. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Takami M, Ieguchi M, Takamatsu K, Hoshi M, Takada J, Oebisu N, Iwai T. Functional evaluation of flail hip joint after periacetabular resection of the pelvis. Osaka City Med J. 1997;43:173-183.
  25. Tillman RM, Myers GJ, Abudu AT, Carter SR, Grimer RJ. The three-pin modified 'Harrington' procedure for advanced metastatic destruction of the acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:84-87. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Wang B, Xie X, Yin J, Zou C, Wang J, Huang G, Wang Y, Shen J. Reconstruction with modular hemipelvicendoprosthesis after pelvic tumor resection: a report of 50 consecutive cases. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0127263. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Wegrzyn J, Malatray M, Al-Qahtani T, Pibarot V, Confavreux C, Freyer G. Total hip arthroplasty for periacetabular metastatic disease. An original technique of reconstruction according to the Harrington classification. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:2546-2555. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Wirbel RJ, Schulte M, Maier B, Mutschler WE. Megaprosthetic replacement of the pelvis: function in 17 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 1999;70:348-352. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Witte D, Bernd L, Bruns J, Gosheger G, Hardes J, Hartwig E, Lehner B, Melcher I, Mutschler W, Schulte M, Tunn PU, Wozniak W, Zahlten-Hinguranage A, Zeifang F. Limb-salvage reconstruction with MUTARS hemipelvicendoprosthesis: a prospective multicenter study. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35:1318-1325. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Zamborsky R, Svec A, Bohac M, Kilian M, Kokavec M. Infection in bone allograft transplants. Exp Clin Transplant. 2016;14:484-490.