Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2023; 90(4):239-250 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2023/029

How Does Affect the Type of Instability after Total Hip Arthroplasty the Outcomes? Our Experience between 1999 and 2020Original papers

J. ©pička1, J. Gallo1, K. Langová2
1 Ortopedická klinika Lékařské fakulty Univerzity Palackého a Fakultní nemocnice Olomouc
2 Oddělení biometrie, Ústav lékařské fyziky a biofyziky, Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci

Purpose of the study
Dislocation is one of the most common early complications of total hip arthroplasty (THA). In this manuscript, 20 years of experience with the management of this complication are presented, particularly in relation to the type of instability.
Material and Methods
In the period between January 1999 and December 2020, at least one dislocation occurred in 157 of 8 286 (1.9%) THA patients, of which 117 dislocations (1.6%) in primary and 40 (3.4%) in revision THAs. Almost all patients were operated on from the anterolateral approach during the follow-up period. The type of dislocation was evaluated using the modified Dorr classification. In the first dislocations, conservative approach was usually opted for, except for cases with a clear malposition, irreducible or unstable hips after the reduction. The minimum follow-up period was 18 months (18-240). The success rate of the chosen treatment approach was assessed by means of standard statistical methods.
Results
The total dislocation rate in the follow-up period was 1.6% for primary THAs and 3.4% for revision THAs. The dislocation rate was slightly higher between 1999 and 2009 compared to the following decade (2.1% versus 1.3% for primary THAs; p=0.009). The most common type of dislocation was the positional dislocation (62%), followed by dislocations due to a combination of causes (17%) and component malposition (11%). Treatment of dislocation was successful in a total of 130 patients (130/157; 83%). Even though a stable hip was achieved in 21 patients (13%), the functional outcome was unsatisfactory, and in 6 patients (4%) we failed to achieve a stable hip. In the positional type of dislocation, the success rate of closed reduction following the first-time dislocation was 86.4% and a similar success rate was reported for reoperations in the first-time dislocations due to the malpositioned components (85.7%). In the second-time dislocation, the surgical therapy was significantly more reliable compared to closed reduction regardless of the type of dislocation (78.6% versus 46%). The treatment of dislocations following primary THAs showed comparable outcomes to those of the treatment of dislocations following revision THAs. Overall, the worst outcomes were achieved in patients with a combined type of dislocation. In total, the THA had to be removed in 11.5% of hips (18/157). The probability of final THA removal increased with the increasing order of dislocation.
Discussion
In our group of patients, the dislocation rate in THA was comparable or lower than the published data. With the use of preventive measures, i.e. dual mobility cup or larger head diameters in high-risk patients, we managed to reduce the dislocation rate over time. The positional type of dislocation prevails in our group of patients just as in the previously published series, followed by instability from malposition of components. The modified Dorr classification is used to guide the treatment since it allows us not only to make good decision about the treatment modality but to some extent also to estimate the final outcome, particularly with respect to restoring a functional and stable hip.
Conclusions
The total dislocation rate was 1.6% for primary THAs and 3.4% for revision THAs. The first-time dislocation of the positional type shall be treated conservatively. Conversely, in the other types of dislocations and in recurrent dislocations, surgical treatment is more likely to achieve a good clinical outcome. The worst outcomes are to be expected in an instability due to combination of multiple causes, which leads to the removal of THA more often than in other types of dislocations. Also, the benefit of preventive measures in high-risk patients over time has been confirmed.

Keywords: total hip arthroplasty, dislocation, Dorr's classification, treatment strategy, outcomes, complications.

Published: August 15, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
©pička J, Gallo J, Langová K. How Does Affect the Type of Instability after Total Hip Arthroplasty the Outcomes? Our Experience between 1999 and 2020. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2023;90(4):239-250. doi: 10.55095/achot2023/029. PubMed PMID: 37690037.
Download citation

References

  1. Alberton GM, High WA, Morrey BF. Dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of risk factors and treatment options. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84:1788-1792. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Bader R, Scholz R, Steinhauser E, Zimmermann S, Busch R, Mittelmeier W. The influence of head and neck geometry on stability of total hip replacement: a mechanical test study. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75:415-421. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Biedermann R, Tonin A, Krismer M, Rachbauer F, Eibl G, Stockl B. Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:762-769. Go to original source...
  4. Biviji AA, Ezzet KA, Pulido P, Colwell CW, Jr. Modular femoral head and liner exchange for the unstable total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:625-630. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Carter AH, Sheehan EC, Mortazavi SM, Purtill JJ, Sharkey PF, Parvizi J. Revision for recurrent instability: what are the predictors of failure? J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:46-52. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Daly PJ, Morrey BF. Operative correction of an unstable total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:1334-1343. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Dargel J, Oppermann J, Bruggemann GP, Eysel P. Dislocation following total hip replacement. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014;111:884-890. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Dennis DA, Lynch CB. Stability advantages of a modular total hip system. Orthopedics. 2005;28:s1049-1052. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Dorr LD, Wolf AW, Chandler R, Conaty JP. Classification and treatment of dislocations of total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;173:151-158. Go to original source...
  10. Eftekhar NS. Dislocation and instability complicating low friction arthroplasty of the hip joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;121:120-125. Go to original source...
  11. Elbuluk AM, Coxe FR, Schimizzi GV, Ranawat AS, Bostrom MP, Sierra RJ, Sculco PK. Abductor deficiency-induced recurrent instability after total hip arthroplasty. JBJS Rev. 2020;8:e0164. Go to original source...
  12. Falez F, Papalia M, Favetti F, Panegrossi G, Casella F, Mazzotta G. Total hip arthroplasty instability in Italy. Int Orthop. 2017;41:635-644. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Gallo J, Lostak J, Langova K. Long-term survival of the uncemented Balgrist total hip replacement cup. Int Orthop. 2013;37:1449-1456. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Grazioli A, Ek ET, Rudiger HA. Biomechanical concept and clinical outcome of dual mobility cups. Int Orthop. 2012;36:2411-2418. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Heckmann ND, Chung BC, Wier JR, Han RB, Lieberman JR. The effect of hip offset and spinopelvic abnormalities on the risk of dislocation following total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2022;37:S546-S551. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Jones CW, De Martino I, D'Apolito R, Nocon AA, Sculco PK, Sculco TP. The use of dual-mobility bearings in patients at high risk of dislocation. Bone Joint J. 2019;101-B:41-45. Go to original source...
  17. Klemt C, Chen W, Bounajem G, Tirumala V, Xiong L, Kwon YM. Outcome and risk factors of failures associated with revision total hip arthroplasty for recurrent dislocation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022;142:1801-1807. Go to original source...
  18. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:217-220. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Lu Y, Xiao H, Xue F. Causes of and treatment options for dislocation following total hip arthroplasty. Exp Ther Med. 2019;18:1715-1722. Go to original source...
  20. Murphy WS, Yun HH, Hayden B, Kowal JH, Murphy SB. The safe zone range for cup anteversion is narrower than for inclination in THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018;476:325-335. Go to original source...
  21. Murray TG, Wetters NG, Moric M, Sporer SM, Paprosky WG, Della Valle CJ. The use of abduction bracing for the prevention of early postoperative dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:126-129. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Ogonda L, Cassidy RS, Beverland DE. A conservative approach to dislocation following total hip arthroplasty: a review of 8606 hips. Hip Int. 2022;32:291-297. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Olerud S, Karlstrom G. Recurrent dislocation after total hip replacement. Treatment by fixing an additional sector to the acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985;67:402-405. Go to original source...
  24. Pagnano W, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG, Shaughnessy WJ. The effect of superior placement of the acetabular component on the rate of loosening after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1004-1014. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Pai FY, Ma HH, Chou TA, Huang TW, Huang KC, Tsai SW, Chen CF, Chen WM. Risk factors and modes of failure in the modern dual mobility implant. A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021;22:541. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Pakarinen O, Karsikas M, Reito A, Lainiala O, Neuvonen P, Eskelinen A. Prediction model for an early revision for dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0274384. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Parvizi J, Morrey BF. Bipolar hip arthroplasty as a salvage treatment for instability of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:1132-1139. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Robbins GM, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, Greidanus N, Duncan CP. Treatment of hip instability. Orthop Clin North Am. 2001;32:593-610. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Ryan SP, Hopkins TJ, Wellman SS, Jiranek WA, Bolognesi MP, Seyler TM. Undersedation during total hip arthroplasty reduction results in worse patient outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2019;34:3061-3064. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Upfill-Brown A, Hsiue PP, Sekimura T, Patel JN, Adamson M, Stavrakis AI. Instability Is the most common indication for revision hip arthroplasty in the United States: national trends from 2012 to 2018. Arthroplast Today. 2021;11:88-101. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. van Erp JHJ, Snijders TE, Weinans H, Castelein RM, Schlosser TPC, de Gast A. The role of the femoral component orientation on dislocations in THA: a systematic review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022;142:1253-1264. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Wang G, Wang H, Yang J, Shen B, Zhou Z, Zeng Y. Reduction of posterior dislocated hip prosthesis using a modified lateral position maneuver: a retrospective, clinical comparative, and follow-up study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23:926. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. Wera GD, Ting NT, Moric M, Paprosky WG, Sporer SM, Della Valle CJ. Classification and management of the unstable total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:710-715. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. Werner BC, Brown TE. Instability after total hip arthroplasty. World J Orthop. 2012;3:122-130. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. Woo RY, Morrey BF. Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64:1295-1306. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  36. Xiao Q, Ling T, Zhou K, Yuan M, Xu B, Zhou Z. Constrained acetabular liners are a viable option in second-stage re-implantation for chronic infected total hip arthroplasty with abductor or greater trochanter deficiency and large acetabular bone defects. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23:915. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  37. Zahar A, Rastogi A, Kendoff D. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2013;6:350-356. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...