Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2023; 90(6):400-407 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2023/048

The Relationship between the Shoulder Functional Score and the Change in Labral Morphology after Arthroscopic Bankart RepairOriginal papers

A. TEMIZ1, Y. ªAHBAT2, İ. M. PEPE1, C. N. AKTEKIN3
1 Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara, Turkey
2 Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology Erzurum, Turkey
3 Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Ankara, Turkey

Purpose of the study The aim of arthroscopic Bankart repair is restoration of the anterior block mechanism and regaining stability. There are few studies that have tested the adequacy of the angle made with the glenoid and the height from the glenoid level of the repaired labral tissue, but the correlation with the clinical results is not clear. The aim of this study was to define the correlation of the height and slope of the repaired labral tissue in the glenoid anterior with the clinical results. Material and methods This prospective study included 20 patients who underwent an arthroscopic Bankart repair. To evaluate the labrum anatomy of the affected shoulder, 4 measurement parameters were defined as axial height (Ah), axial slope (As), oblique coronal height (Ch), and oblique coronal slope (Cs) on non-contrast T2 MRI. The measurements were taken preoperatively of the affected shoulder and at 1 year postoperatively of both the affected shoulder and the contralateral asymptomatic shoulder. The measured values were compared with each other and with the contralateral shoulder. Correlations of the anatomic values with the Constant-Murley scores recorded at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively were examined with the Wilcoxon test. Results The mean preoperative Constant score of the patients was 57.7 (32-77) and postoperative scores at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 63.6 (44-79), 77.8 (61-90), 89.6 (77-100), and 95.2 (79-100), respectively (p=0.001). There was a statistically significant difference in the preoperative MRI measurements of the axial and oblique coronal plane labral height and slope values compared to the postoperative values and those of the asymptomatic contralateral shoulder (p< 0.05 for all). There was no statistically significant difference between the labral height and slope values of both planes postoperatively compared to the asymptomatic contralateral shoulder (p= 0.776, p= 0.910, p= 0.132, p= 0.589, respectively). These increases in the radiological data were not found to be statistically significant in the correlation analysis with the increases in the Constant-Murley scores (Ah p=0.935, As p=0.587, Ch p=0.078, Cs p=0.105). Conclusions This prospective study was conducted using conventional T2 magnetic resonance imaging, which was sufficient for the measurement of labral height and slope. This study results showed no significant correlation between the radiological and clinical outcomes.

Keywords: Bankart repair, labrum height, labrum slope, functional result.

Published: December 1, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
TEMIZ A, ªAHBAT Y, PEPE İM, AKTEKIN CN. The Relationship between the Shoulder Functional Score and the Change in Labral Morphology after Arthroscopic Bankart Repair. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2023;90(6):400-407. doi: 10.55095/achot2023/048. PubMed PMID: 38191541.
Download citation

References

  1. Adam M, Attia AK, Alhammoud A, Aldahamsheh O, Al Ateeq Al Dosari M, Ahmed G. Arthroscopic Bankart repair for the acute anterior shoulder dislocation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int orthop 2018; 42:2413-2422. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Bui-Mansfield LT, Banks KP, Taylor DC. Humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligaments: the HAGL lesion. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35:1960-1966. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Constant C, Murley A. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;214:160-164. Go to original source...
  4. Fabbriciani C, Milano G, Demontis A, Fadda S, Ziranu F, Mulas PD. Arthroscopic versus open treatment of Bankart lesion of the shoulder: a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy 2004; 20:456-462. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Farber JM, Buckwalter KA. Sports-related injuries of the shoulder: instability. Radiol Clin North Am. 2002;40:235-249. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Howell SM, Galinat BJ. The glenoid-labral socket: a constrained articular surface. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;243:122-125. Go to original source...
  7. Hurley ET, Manjunath AK, Bloom DA, Pauzenberger L, Mullett H, Alaia MJ, Strauss EJ. Arthroscopic Bankart repair versus conservative management for first-time traumatic anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthroscopy. 2020;36:2526-2532. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Kim J-Y, Chung SW, Kwak JY. Morphological characteristics of the repaired labrum according to glenoid location and its clinical relevance after arthroscopic Bankart repair: postoperative evaluation with computed tomography arthrography. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42:1304-1314. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Kim S-J, Jung M, Moon H-K, Chang WH, Kim SG, Chun YM. Is the transglenoid suture technique recommendable for recurrent shoulder dislocation? A minimum 5-year follow-up in 59 non-athletic shoulders. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17:1458-1462. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Lazarus MD, Sidles JA, Harryman DT 2nd, Matsen FA 3rd. Effect of a chondral-labral defect on glenoid concavity and glenohumeral stability. A cadaveric model. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:94-102. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Lippitt S, Matsen F. Mechanisms of glenohumeral joint stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;291:20-28. Go to original source...
  12. Ma R, Brimmo OA, Li X, Colbert L. Current concepts in rehabilitation for traumatic anterior shoulder instability. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017;10:499-506. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. McAdams TR, Fredericson M, Vogelsong M, Gold G. New developments in magnetic resonance imaging techniques for shoulder instability in athletes. Open Access J Sports Med. 2010;1:137-142. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Oh JH, Kim JY, Choi J-A, Kim WS. Effectiveness of multidetector computed tomography arthrography for the diagnosis of shoulder pathology: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging with arthroscopic correlation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19:14-20. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Palmer WE, Brown JH, Rosenthal DI. Labral-ligamentous complex of the shoulder: evaluation with MR arthrography. Radiology. 1994;190:645-651. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Park J-Y, Lee S-J, Lhee S-H, Oh JH. Change in labrum height after arthroscopic Bankart repair: correlation with preoperative tissue quality and clinical outcome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21:1712-1720. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Provencher MT, Midtgaard KS, Owens BD, Tokish JM. Diagnosis and management of traumatic anterior shoulder instability. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021;29:e51-e61. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Saleem AM, Lee JK, Novak LM. Usefulness of the abduction and external rotation views in shoulder MR arthrography. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:1024-1030. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Samim M, Gyftopoulos S. Postoperative MRI of shoulder instability. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2022;30:601-615. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Schiffern SC, Rozencwaig R, Antoniou J, Richardson ML, Matsen FA 3rd. Anteroposterior centering of the humeral head on the glenoid in vivo. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:382-387. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Shankman S, Bencardino J, Beltran J. Glenohumeral instability: evaluation using MR arthrography of the shoulder. Skeletal Radiol. 1999; 28:365-382. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Stein T, Buckup J, Mehling A, Hoffmann R, Efe T, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Welsch F. Restoration of joint congruency and the glenoidal labrum after arthroscopic revision Bankart repair: a MRI match-paired analysis comparing primary Bankart repair and the uninjured labrum. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134:1121-1134. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Stein T, Mehling A, Reck C, Buckup J, Efe T, Hoffmann R, Jäger A, Welsch F. MRI assessment of the structural labrum integrity after Bankart repair using knotless bio-anchors. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19:1771-1779. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Stein T, Mehling A, Ulmer M, Reck C, Efe T, Hoffmann R, Jäger A, Welsch F. MRI graduation of osseous reaction and drill hole consolidation after arthroscopic Bankart repair with PLLA anchors and the clinical relevance. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:2163-2173. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Stirling P, Crighton E, Butterworth G, Elias-Jones C, Brooksbank AJ, Jenkins PJ. Glenoid track measurement using magnetic resonance imaging arthrography is predictive of recurrent instability following arthroscopic shoulder stabilisation. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022;32:1313-1317. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Sugimoto H, Suzuki K, Mihara K, Kubota H, Tsutsui H. MR arthrography of shoulders after suture-anchor Bankart repair. Radiology 2002; 224:105-111. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Walz DM, Burge AJ, Steinbach L. Imaging of shoulder instability. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2015;19:254-268. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Yoo JC, Lee YS, Tae SK, Park JH, Park JW, Ha HC. Magnetic resonance imaging appearance of a repaired capsulolabral complex after arthroscopic Bankart repair. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36:2310-2316. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Zhu M, Young SW, Pinto C, Poon PC. Functional outcome and the structural integrity of arthroscopic Bankart repair: a prospective trial. Shoulder Elbow 2015;7:85-93. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...