Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2024; 91(1):24-33 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2024/008
Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the AMIS Method: Surgical Technique, Suitability of This Method for Obese Patients, Evaluation of the Study PopulationOriginal papers
- Ortopedické oddělení, Nemocnice Vršovice a.s., Praha
Purpose of the study This manuscript aims to introduce our surgical technique, with an emphasis on the latest recommendations. The AMIS technique is discussed in more detail in patients with Class II and Class III obesity. We seek to prove the premise claiming that the anteversion and inclination values observed in this group of patients do not differ significantly from those observed in patients with the recommended BMI index. We will also compare the risk of neurovascular bundle injury and postoperative complication rate regarding the surgical wound. Material and methods Patients who underwent surgery using the AMIS method in the period between 1/2020 and 4/2023 were assessed retrospectively. The study included 1150 implantations. The entire study population was assessed for neurovascular bundle injury and surgical wound healing complications. For this purpose, the patients were divided into two groups based on the BMI, namely BMI < 35 kg/m2 (n=1042) and BMI > 35 kg/m2 (n=108). In patients with the BMI ≤ 25 kg/m2 (n=280) and BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 (n=108), the inclination and anteversion values were compared. Standard centered AP view X-rays of their operated joints were assessed. The Liaw's method was used to calculate the anteversion and inclination. Results In group one of patients with BMI ≤ 25 kg/m2 (208 women and 72 men), the arithmetic mean of acetabular anteversion was 25.4° (median 25°) and inclination was 38.3° (median 38°). In group two, which consisted of patients with BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2 (59 women and 49 men), the total arithmetic mean of acetabular anteversion was 25.1° (median 25) and inclination was 37.6° (median 37.5°). The anteversion and inclination were assessed using the Mann-Whitney test for equality of medians. The value of 0.05 was chosen as the level of significance. The resulting p-value was 0.5359 in anteversion and 0.3763 in inclination. Since the p-value of both anteversion and inclination was greater than the chosen level of significance, their medians have not been confirmed to differ significantly. A total of 6 cases of femoral nerve injury was reported, i.e. 0.5% out of 1150. Therefore, the risk of injury was 0.4% in the group with BMI < 35 kg/m2 (n=1042). On the contrary, in the group of patients with BMI > 35 kg/m2 (n=108), the risk was 2%. No injury to femoral artery was reported. The surgical wound healing complications were seen in a total of 87 cases (7.6%). In the group with BMI < 35 kg/m2, healing complications of the surgical wound were observed in 7.4% of cases, with the need for revision surgery in 7 patients. In the group with BMI > 35 kg/m2, healing complications occurred in 13% of patients and wound revision was necessary in 4 cases. Discussion Our results are consistent with those in the published studies that also show no significant difference in anteversion and inclination of components in the compared groups of obese patients. We also agree with the other authors that the rate of complications regarding surgical wound healing is higher in these patients. The risk of neurovascular bundle injury in this study population is not higher than the standard. Conclusions The results obtained in our study population show that this method can also be used in patients with higher BMI, with no concern about the implantation of components in malposition or a higher risk of neurovascular injury. Nonetheless, potentially higher risk of surgical wound healing should be considered when this approach is opted for. With the appropriate surgical technique, AMIS is a safe method and, in our view, the first choice especially for obese patients.
Keywords: AMIS, anteversion, inclination, hip joint, obesity, BMI, implantation, total joint replacement.
Published: February 1, 2024 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- Amlie E, Havelin LI, Furnes O, Baste V, Nordsletten L, Hovik O, Dimmen S. Worse patient-reported outcome after lateral approach than after anterior and posterolateral approach in primary hip arthroplasty. A cross-sectional questionnaire study of 1,476 patients 1-3 years after surgery. Acta Orthop. 2014;85:463-469.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Antoniadis A, Dimitriou D, Flury A, Wiedmer G, Hasler J, Helmy N. Is direct anterior approach a credible option for severely obese patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty? A matched-control, retrospective, clinical study. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33:2535-2540. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.071.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Bajwa S. Surgical technique of direct anterior approach for primary total hip arthroplasty using a leg positioning traction system. J Orthop Case Rep. 2023;13:112-121.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Barrett WP, Turner SE, Leopold JP. Prospective randomized study of direct anterior vs postero-lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:1634-1638.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Barton C, Kim PR. Complications of the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009;40:371-375.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Bender B, Nogler M, Hozack WJ. Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009;40:321-328.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Berend KR, Lombardi AV, Seng BE, Adams JB. Enhanced early outcomes with the anterior supine intermuscular approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(Suppl 6):107-120.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Connolly KP, Kamath AF. Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: literature review of variations in surgical technique. World J Orthop. 2016;7:38-43. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v7.i1.38.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- De Geest T, Vansintjan P, De Loore G. Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty: complications and early outcome in a series of 300 cases. Acta Orthop Belg. 2013;79:166-173.
- Grob K, Monahan R, Gilbey H, Yap F, Filgueira L, Kuster M. Distal extension of the direct anterior approach to the hip poses risk to neurovascular structures: an anatomical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97:126-132.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Horne PH, Olson SA. Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty using the fracture table. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2011;4:139-145.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Chen LH, Huang QW, Wang WJ, He ZR, Ding WL. The applied anatomy of anterior approach for minimally invasive hip joint surgery. Clin Anat. 2009;22:250-255.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Chládek P, Trč T. Femoroacetabulární impingement syndrom - preartróza kyčelního kloubu [Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome - pre-arthritis of the hip]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2007;74:354-358.
Go to original source...
- Jahng KH, Bas MA, Rodriguez JA, Cooper HJ. Risk factors for wound complications after direct anterior approach hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31:2583-2587.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Keggi KJ, Huo MH, Zatorski LE. Anterior approach to total hip replacement: surgical technique and clinical results of our first one thousand cases using non-cemented prostheses. Yale J Biol Med. 1993;66:243-256.
- Leunig M, Faas M, von Knoch F, Naal FD. Skin crease 'bikini' incision for anterior approach total hip arthroplasty: surgical technique and preliminary results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:2245-2252.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Matsuura M, Ohashi H, Okamoto Y, Inori F, Okajima Y. Elevation of the femur in THA through a direct anterior approach: cadaver and clinical studies. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:3201-3206.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Moskal JT, Capps SG, Scanelli JA. Anterior muscle sparing approach for total hip arthroplasty. World J Orthop. 2013;4:12-18.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Nam D, Sculco PK, Abdel MP, Alexiades MM, Figgie MP, Mayman DJ. Leg-length inequalities following THA based on surgical technique. Orthopedics. 2013;36:395-400.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Orth M, Osche D, Mörsdorf P, Holstein JH, Rollmann MF, Fritz T, Pohlemann T, Pizanis A. Minimal-invasive anterior approach to the hip provides a better surgery-related and early postoperative functional outcome than conventional lateral approach after hip hemiarthroplasty following femoral neck fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023;143:3173-3181. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04602-2.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Park YS, Shin WC, Lee SM, Kwak SH, Bae JY, Suh KT. The best method for evaluating anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty on plain radiographs. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13:66. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0767-4.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Rachbauer F, Kain MS, Leunig M. The history of the anterior approach to the hip. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009;40:311-320.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Ropars M, Morandi X, Huten D, Thomazeau H, Berton E, Darnault P. Anatomical study of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve with special reference to minimally invasive anterior approach for total hip replacement. Surg Radiol Anat. 2009;31:199-204.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Verhaegen JCF, Wei R, Kim P, Beaulé PE, Corten K, Grammatopoulos G. The safety and efficacy of the anterior approach total hip arthroplasty as per body mass index. J Arthroplasty. 2023;38:314-322.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.08.021.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Yang IH. Neurovascular injury in hip arthroplasty. Hip Pelvis. 2014;26:74-78. doi: 10.5371/hp.2014.26.2.74.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...