Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2024; 91(1):34-43 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2024/002

Arthroscopic Subtalar Distraction Arthrodesis in Post-Traumatic IndicationsOriginal papers

V. RAK, J. ©RÁMEK, D. IRA, M. KRTIČKA
Klinika úrazové chirurgie Fakultní nemocnice Brno

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: This manuscript aims to present the method of arthroscopic assisted subtalar arthrodesis and to evaluate the benefits of this surgery on our study population.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the period from 9/2007 to 1/2020, a total of 33 subtalar arthrodesis were performed in 31 patients aged 19-66 years (mean 48 years, median 50 years). The indication for arthrodesis was subtalar arthritis causing pain and gait disorders, or hindfoot deformities (most commonly after a calcaneus bone fracture). The arthroscopic assisted subtalar arthrodesis was performed with autologous tricortical bone block graft harvesting from the pelvis, supplemented by autologous cancellous bone graft. Stabilization was achieved by cannulated screws inserted in neutral ankle position. Patients in our retrospective study were followed up for a mean of 48 months (range, 24-130 months). The patients were evaluated preoperatively and at 2 years after surgery. The hindfoot angles and height (TCA - talocalcaneal angle, CIA - calcaneal inclination angle, TCH - talocalcaneal height) were evaluated on radiographs, bone union was assessed on radiographs and CT scans. The clinical assessment was performed using the ankle-hindfoot scale (AHS) of AOFAS (AOFAS score).

RESULTS: The preoperative AOFAS score was 35-68 points (mean 52, median 54), the postoperative AOFAS score at 2 years after arthrodesis was 58-94 points (mean 82, median 82). Both the mean and median values of AOFAS score showed a significant progress from the poor result to the good and excellent result. After 2 years the TCA value decreased in 18 patients (56%) by no more than 3°. The CIA decrease observed in 21 patients (64%) was by 1° on average. The TCH decrease of 1-5 mm after 2 years since the surgery was seen in 16 patients. In 2 patients incomplete healing of arthrodesis was observed, manifested as a clinically asymptomatic non-union. No deep infection was reported.

DISCUSSION: In agreement with the current literature, the arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis has been confirmed to be a safe method for the management of consequences of hindfoot fractures, with minimum complications and leading to accelerated bone fusion. Differences can be found in the approach, position, use of cancellous bone graft and surgical techniques. In recent years, prone position, posterior approaches, use of cancellous bone graft, distraction and fixation with 2-3 screws divergently inserted into the bone prevail. The degree of healing of the bone fusion is generally an important factor. In our study population, non-healing was recorded in 2 patients, namely in the form of a clinically silent non-union. Neurological or early complications and/or osteosynthesis material failure occurred in up to a maximum of 10% of cases. The conclusive results of minimally invasive arthrodesis based on the AOFAS score have been confirmed by us as well as by most authors. CONCLUSSIONS Our study confirmed that the arthroscopic assisted subtalar arthrodesis is a successful, reliable and safe minimally invasive method, with minimum complications, leading to stable arthrodesis.

Keywords: subtalar arthrodesis, subtalar arthroscopy.

Published: February 1, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
RAK V, ©RÁMEK J, IRA D, KRTIČKA M. Arthroscopic Subtalar Distraction Arthrodesis in Post-Traumatic Indications. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2024;91(1):34-43. doi: 10.55095/achot2024/002. PubMed PMID: 38447563.
Download citation

References

  1. Albert A, Deleu PA, Leemrijse T, Maldague P, Devos Bevernage. Posterior arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis: ten cases a tone-year follow up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011;97:401-405. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Allmacher D, Galles KS, Marsh JL. Intra-articular calcaneal fractures treated nonoperatively and followed sequentially for 2 decades. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20:464-469. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Amendola A, Lee KB. Saltzman CL, Suh JS. Technique end early experiance with posterior arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2007; 28:298-302. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Bernasconi A, Guillard C, Lintz F. Anterolateral arthroscopic posterior subtalar arthrodesis: the surgical technique. Arthrosc Tech. 2017;6:1183-1188. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Boffeli T, Reinking RR. A 2-screw fixation technique for subtalar joint fusion: a retrospective case series using a 2-screw fixation construct with operative pearl. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;51:734-738. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Carro L, Golanó P, Vega J. Arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis. the posterior approach in the prone positron. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:445.el-445.e4. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Coulomb R, Hsayri E, Nougarede B, Marchand P, Mares O, Kouyoumdjian P, Cellier N. Do clinical results of arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis correlate with CT fusion ratio? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;105:1125-1129. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Dorsey ML, Liu PT. Roberts CC, Kile TA. Correlation of arthrodesis stability with degree of joint fusion on MDCT. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;2:496-499. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Dutra JMG, Barcelos VA, Prata SDS, Rizzo MAG, Filho LRL, Bento de Oliveira D. Arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis - results and complications: a systematic review. J Foot Ankle. 2020;14:205-210. Go to original source...
  10. Eichinger M, Schmölz1 W, Brunner A, Mayr R, Bölderl A. Subtalar arthrodesis stabilisation with screws in an angulated configuration is superior to the parallel disposition: a biomechanical study. Int Orthop. 2015;39:2275-2280. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Gajdoąíková K, Veselý R, Suchomel R. Ztráta korekce zlomeniny patní kosti dle typů osteosyntézy. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2019;86:124-130. Go to original source...
  12. Glanzmann MC, Sanhueza-Hernandez R. Arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis for symptomatic osteoarthritis of the hindfoot: a prospective study of 41 cases. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:2-7. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Jastifer JR, Alrafee S, Howard P, Gustafson PA, Coughlin MJ. Biomechanical evaluation of strength and stiffness of subtalar joint arthrodesis screw constructs. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37:419-426. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley J, Myerson MS. Clinical rating system for the ankle -hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and leaser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:349-353. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Lee KB, Part CH, Seon JK, Kim MS. Arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis using a posterior 2-portal approach in the prone position. Arthroscopy. 2010;26:230-238. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Lopes R, Andrieu M, Bauer T. Arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102(8S):S311-S316. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Narita N, Takao M, Innami K, Kato H. Matsushita T. Minimally invasive subtalar arthrodesis with iliac crest autograft through posterior arthroscopic portals: a technical note. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33:803-805. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Rak V, Ira D, Masek M. Operative treatment of intra-articular calcaneal fractures with calcaneal plates and its complications. Indian J Orthop. 2009;43:271-280. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Rak V, Matonoha P, Otáhal M, Maąek M. Vaskularizace laterální strany paty ve vztahu k extenzivnímu koľnímu řezu k osteosyntéze zlomeniny kalkanea. Rozhl Chir. 2007;86:483-488.
  20. Rammelt S, Amlang M, Barthel S, Zwipp H. Minimally-invasive treatment of calcaneal fractures. Injury. 2004;35(Suppl 2):B55-B63. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Rammelt S, Zwipp H, Fractures of the calcaneus: current treatment strategies. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2014;81:177-196. Go to original source...
  22. Shamrock AG, Amendola A, Glass NA, Shamrock KH, Cychosz ChC, Carender ChN, Duchamn KR. Do patient positioning and portal placement for arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis matter? Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8:2325967120926451. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Tasto JP. Arthroscopy of the subtalar joint and arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis. Instr Course Lect. 2006;55:555-564.
  24. Thaunat M, Bajard X, Boisrenoult P, Beaufils P, Oger P. Correlation of arthrodesis stability with degree of joint fusion on MDCT. Int Orthop. 2012;36:1005-1010. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Vilá-Rico J, Ojeda-Thies C, Parra-Sanchez G. Arthroscopic posterior subtalar arthrodesis: surgical technique. Arthrosc Tech. 2016;5:e85-e88. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Vilá-Rico J, Ojeda-Thies C, Parra-Sanchez G, Mellado-Romero MA, Sánchez-Moraata EJ, Ramos-Pascua LR. Arthroscopic posterior subtalar arthrodesis for salvage of posttraumatic arthritis following calcaneal fractures. Injury. 2018;49(Suppl 2):S65-S70. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...