Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2024; 91(2):103-108 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2024/011

Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Image Reformation for Comparison of Foraminal Cross-Sectional Dimension in Patients Who Have Undergone Laminoplasty and Laminectomy with FusionOriginal papers

S.-J. LEE1, H.-J. LEE2, 3, Y.-M. LEE4, M. F. DESLIVIA5, W.-K. MIN2, 3
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine and Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Sungsan-Gu, Changwon, Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea
2 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Jung-gu, Daegu, Korea
3 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Jung-gu, Daegu, Korea
4 Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Jung-gu, Daegu, Korea
5 Department of Orthopaedics, St Carolus Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia

Purpose of the study
Laminectomy with fusion (LF) is commonly performed with laminoplasty (LP) for cervical myelopathy. Foraminal stenosis is important in the surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy. LF and LP can affect foraminal size in different ways. This study aimed to compare foraminal dimensions after LF and LP using a medical computer-assisted design (CAD) program.
Material and methods
Computed tomography (CT) scans of the cervical vertebrae of 16 patients with cervical myelopathy were retrospectively viewed in the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine format on a CAD program. CT images were reformatted in an oblique plane perpendicular to the long axis of each foramen from C2-C3 to C6-C7. The narrowest foraminal cross-sectional dimension (FCD) was measured and compared between the LF and LP groups at the operated, non-operated, and C4-C5 levels. The difference between the preoperative and postoperative FCDs was also calculated and compared between the operated and C4-C5 levels. Intra- and interobserver reliabilities for FCD measurements were evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients.
Results and Discussion
At the operated spinal levels, the LF and LP groups showed decreased and increased mean FCDs, respectively. At the adjacent non-operated levels, the mean FCD slightly increased in both the groups. In the LF group, the difference between the preoperative and postoperative FCDs in the C4-C5 levels was larger than that in the other operated levels, but this difference was insignificant.
Conclusions
LF and LP showed contrary results for FCD. Therefore, FCD and kyphosis should be considered for LF and LP.

Keywords: three-dimensional, foraminal cross-sectional dimension, laminoplasty, laminectomy fusion, computer-aided design, drafting system, preoperative-postoperative comparison.

Received: January 6, 2024; Revised: January 6, 2024; Accepted: June 13, 2024; Published: June 12, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
LEE S-J, LEE H-J, LEE Y-M, DESLIVIA MF, MIN W-K. Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Image Reformation for Comparison of Foraminal Cross-Sectional Dimension in Patients Who Have Undergone Laminoplasty and Laminectomy with Fusion. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2024;91(2):103-108. doi: 10.55095/achot2024/011. PubMed PMID: 38801666.


Erratum published in Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2024; 91(3):188 - DOI: 10.55095/achot2024/016


Download citation

References

  1. Abola MV, Knapik DM, Hamparsumian AA, Marcus RE, Liu RW, Gordon ZL. Relationship between foraminal area and degenerative changes in the lower cervical spine with implications for C5 nerve root palsy. Orthopedics. 2018;41:e506-e510. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Blizzard DJ, Caputo AM, Sheets CZ, Klement MR, Michael KW, Isaacs RE, Brown CR. Laminoplasty versus laminectomy with fusion for the treatment of spondylotic cervical myelopathy: short-term follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2017;26:85-93. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Gu Y, Cao P, Gao R, Tian Y, Liang L, Wang C, Yang L, Yuan W. Incidence and risk factors of C5 palsy following posterior cervical decompression: a systematic review. PLOS One. 2014;9:e101933. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Kang KC, Suk KS, Kim HS, Moon SH, Lee HM, Seo JH, Kim SM, Jin SY, Mella P. Preoperative risk factors of C5 nerve root palsy after laminectomy and fusion in patients with cervical myelopathy: analysis of 70 consecutive patients. Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30:419-424. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Kitagawa T, Fujiwara A, Kobayashi N, Saiki K, Tamai K, Saotome K. Morphologic changes in the cervical neural foramen due to flexion and extension: in vivo imaging study. Spine. 2004;29:2821-2825. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Krätzig T, Mohme M, Mende KC, Eicker SO, Floeth FW. Impact of the surgical strategy on the incidence of C5 nerve root palsy in decompressive cervical surgery. PLOS One. 2017;12;e0188338. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Lee SH, Suk KS, Kang KC, Cho SW, Juh HS, Lee JH, Kim KT. Outcomes and related factors of C5 palsy following cervical laminectomy with instrumented fusion compared with laminoplasty. Spine. 2016;41:E574-R579. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Ma L, Liu FY, Huo LS, Zhao ZQ, Sun XZ, Li F, Ding WY. Comparison of laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion in the treatment of multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:e11542. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Nassr A, Eck JC, Ponnappan RK, Zanoun RR, Donaldson III WF, Kang JD. The incidence of C5 palsy after multilevel cervical decompression procedures: a review of 750 consecutive cases. Spine. 2012;37:174-178. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Park JH, Ahn JS, Lee HJ, Shin BK. Comparison between radiological and clinical outcomes of laminoplasties with titanium miniplates for cervical myelopathy. Clin Orthop Surg. 2016;8:399-406. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Roberts CC, McDaniel NT, Krupinski EA, Erly WK. Oblique reformation in cervical spine computed tomography: a new look at an old friend. Spine. 2003;28:167-170. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Rovira M, Torrent O, Ruscalleda J. Some aspects of the spinal cord circulation in cervical myelopathy, Neuroradiology. 1975;9:209-214. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Satomi K, Nishu Y, Kohno T, Hirabayashi K. Long-term follow-up studies of open-door expansive laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine. 1994;19:507-510. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Scheer JK, Tang JA, Smith JS, Acosta FL, Protopsaltis TS, Blondel B, Bess S, Shaffrey CI, Deviren V, Lafage V, Schwab F. Cervical spine alignment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implications: a review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19:141-159. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Shinomiya K, Okawa A, Nakao K, Mochida K, Haro H, Sato T, Heima S. Morphology of C5 ventral nerve rootlets as part of dissociated motor loss of deltoid muscle. Spine. 1994;19:2501-2504. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Simpson AK, Sabino J, Whang P, Emerson JW, Grauer JN. The assessment of cervical foramina with oblique radiographs: the effect of film angle on foraminal area. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009;22:21-25. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Suk KS, Lee SH, Park SY, Kim HS, Moon SH, Lee HM. Clinical outcome and changes of foraminal dimension in patients with foraminal stenosis after ACDF. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2015;28:E449-E453. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Takemitsu M, Cheung KM, Wong YW, Cheung WY, Luk KD. C5 nerve root palsy after cervical laminoplasty and posterior fusion with instrumentation. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;21:267-272. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...