Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2024; 91(5):289-295 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2024/054

Risk Factors for Early Implant Failure in Geriatric Intertrochanteric Fractures Treated with Twin Interlocking Derotation and Compression Screw Cephalomedullary Nail (InterTAN)

E. ÖZMEN1, T. F. YAĞCI2, A. M. YILDIRIM2*, M. ALTAN3, A. ERŞEN2, Y. SAĞLAM2
1 Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Istanbul Physical Therapy Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
2 Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
3 Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Istanbul Medilife Capa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Purpose of the study: Intertrochanteric hip fractures in elderly patients are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, with increasing incidence due to the aging population. Despite advancements in intramedullary nailing (IMN) technology, fixation failure remains a concern. This study aims to evaluate pre-and postoperative radiographic risk factors for varus collapse in geriatric intertrochanteric fractures treated with twin interlocking derotation and compression screw cephalomedullary nail (InterTAN, Smith & Nephew).

Material and Methods: This retrospective study included patients over 60 years with AO 31A1 and 31A2 intertrochanteric femur fractures treated with InterTAN at a tertiary referral center from August 2012 to August 2017. Patients with high-energy fractures, AO 31A3 fractures, or those requiring open reduction were excluded. Data on demographics, fracture classification, implant sizes, imaging studies, and follow-up were collected. Radiographic assessments included Chang's medial cortical support concept, tip-apex distance (TAD), calcar-referenced TAD (CalTAD), neck-shaft angles (NSA), and screw placement according to Cleveland zones. Varus collapse was defined as a >5° change in NSA within three months postoperatively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for varus collapse.

Results: The study included 136 patients with a mean age of 79.8 years, of whom 38.2% were male. The early postoperative tip-apex distance (TAD) averaged 21.9 mm, with 30.1% of patients experiencing varus collapse greater than 5°. Positive medial cortical support (PMCS) or neutral position (NP) type reduction was highly protective against varus collapse (p < 0.001), as well as TAD less than 25 mm (p < 0.001). Additionally, the placement of screws in the central-central or central-inferior zones provided a protective effect against varus collapse (p = 0.031). Conversely, having an OTA/AO type A2.2 or A2.3 fracture significantly increased the risk of varus collapse (p = 0.030). Other factors, such as CalTAD and the nail width to medullary canal ratio, did not significantly predict varus collapse (p = 0.831 and p = 0.952, respectively).

Discussion: Our findings align with previous studies highlighting TAD and screw placement as critical factors in preventing fixation failure. The protective effect of PMCS or NP reduction and the increased risk associated with OTA/AO type A2.2 and A2.3 fractures are noteworthy. Unlike previous studies, CalTAD was not significantly associated with varus collapse in our cohort. The study underscores the importance of surgical technique and radiographic parameters in optimizing outcomes for elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures.

Conclusions: In elderly patients treated with InterTAN nails, varus collapse is influenced by fracture type, TAD, reduction quality, and screw placement. Ensuring a TAD <25 mm, achieving PMCS or NP reduction, and placing screws in central-central or central-inferior zones are crucial for minimizing varus collapse. These findings highlight the importance of meticulous surgical technique and radiographic assessment in managing intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly.

Keywords: hip fractures, intertrochanteric fractures, internal Fixation, geriatrics, cephalomedullary nail.

Accepted: October 2, 2024; Published: October 21, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
ÖZMEN E, YAĞCI TF, YILDIRIM AM, ALTAN M, ERŞEN A, SAĞLAM Y. Risk Factors for Early Implant Failure in Geriatric Intertrochanteric Fractures Treated with Twin Interlocking Derotation and Compression Screw Cephalomedullary Nail (InterTAN). Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2024;91(5):289-295. doi: 10.55095/achot2024/054. PubMed PMID: 39496195.
Download citation

References

  1. Adeyemi A, Delhougne G. Incidence and economic burden of intertrochanteric fracture: a Medicare claims database analysis. JBJS Open Access. 2019;4:e0045. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:1058-1064. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Bojan AJ, Beimel C, Taglang G, Collin D, Ekholm C, Jönsson A. Critical factors in cut-out complication after Gamma Nail treatment of proximal femoral fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:1-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Bonnaire F, Lein T, Bula P. Trochanteric femoral fractures: anatomy, biomechanics and choice of implants. Unfallchirurg. 2011;114:491-500. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Buyukkuscu MO, Basilgan S, Misir A, Polat A, Basar H. Factors associated with the development of screw cut-out after the fixation of intertrochanteric femoral fractures with a proximal femoral nail. J Health Sci Med. 2021;4:170-175. Go to original source...
  6. Caruso G, Bonomo M, Valpiani G, Salvatori G, Gildone A, Lorusso V, Massari L. A six-year retrospective analysis of cut-out risk predictors in cephalomedullary nailing for pertrochanteric fractures: Can the tip-apex distance (TAD) still be considered the best parameter? Bone Joint Res. 2017;6:481-488. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Ciufo DJ, Ketz JP. Proximal femoral shortening and varus collapse after fixation of "stable" pertrochanteric femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2021;35:87-91. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Cleveland M, Bosworth DM, Thompson FR, Wilson HJ, Ishizuka T. A ten-year analysis of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1959;41:1399-1408. Go to original source...
  9. De Bruijn K, den Hartog D, Tuinebreijer W, Roukema G. Reliability of predictors for screw cutout in intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:1266-1272. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Evans EM. The treatment of trochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1949;31:190-203. Go to original source...
  11. Fujii T, Nakayama S, Hara M, Koizumi W, Itabashi T, Saito M. Tip-apex distance is most important of six predictors of screw cutout after internal fixation of intertrochanteric fractures in women. JBJS Open Access. 2017;2: e0022. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Grønhaug KM, Dybvik E, Matre K, Östman B, Gjertsen J-E. Intramedullary nail versus sliding hip screw for stable and unstable trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures: 17,341 patients from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register. Bone Joint J. 2022;104:274-282. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Haentjens P, Magaziner J, Colón-Emeric CS, Vanderschueren D, Milisen K, Velkeniers B, Boonen S. Meta-analysis: excess mortality after hip fracture among older women and men. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:380-390. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Hao Y, Zhang Z, Zhou F, Ji H, Tian Y, Guo Y, Lv Y, Yang Z, Hou G. Risk factors for implant failure in reverse oblique and transverse intertrochanteric fractures treated with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14:1-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Heřt J, Barták V, Fulin P, Pokorný D, Sosna A. Does the femoral CCD angle measurement in a standard AP projection correlate with the true anatomical shape of the femur? Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2021;88:169-175. Go to original source...
  16. Kannus P, Parkkari J, Sievänen H, Heinonen A, Vuori I, Järvinen M. Epidemiology of hip fractures. Bone. 1996;18(1 Suppl):57S-63S. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Kashigar A, Vincent A, Gunton MJ, Backstein D, Safir O, Kuzyk PR. Predictors of failure for cephalomedullary nailing of proximal femoral fractures. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B:1029-1034. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Mariconda M, Costa GG, Cerbasi S, Recano P, Aitanti E, Gambacorta M, Misasi M. The determinants of mortality and morbidity during the year following fracture of the hip: a prospective study. Bone Joint J. 2015;97-B:383-390. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Marsillo E, Pintore A, Asparago G, Oliva F, Maffulli N. Cephalomedullary nailing for reverse oblique intertrochanteric fractures 31A3 (AO/OTA). Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2022;14:38560. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Matre K, Vinje T, Havelin LI, Gjertsen J-E, Furnes O, Espehaug B, Kjellevold SH, Fevang JM. TRIGEN INTERTAN intramedullary nail versus sliding hip screw: a prospective, randomized multicenter study on pain, function, and complications in 684 patients with an intertrochanteric or subtrochanteric fracture and one year of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:200-208. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Müller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzker J. The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
  22. Olmedo-Garcia NI, Vergara JLM, Miralles TLA, Andrés JVS, Vives AM, Cruz Renovell C, Granell Beltran V. Assessment of magnification of digital radiographs in total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop. 2018;15:931-914. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Pervez H, Parker MJ, Vowler S. Prediction of fixation failure after sliding hip screw fixation. Injury. 2004;35:994-998. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Ryu H-G, Shin DW, Han BS, Kim S-M. Risk factors associated with fixation failure in intertrochanteric fracture treated with cephalomedullary nail. Hip Pelvis. 2023;35:193-199. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Sambandam SN, Chandrasekharan J, Mounasamy V, Mauffrey C. Intertrochanteric fractures: a review of fixation methods. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016;26:339-353. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Selim A, Al-Hadithy N, Diab NM, Ahmed AM, Kader KFA, Hegazy M, et al. Proposal of a modified tip apex distance for prediction of lag screw cut-out in trochanteric hip fractures. SICOT-J. 2023;9:28. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Turgut A, Filibeli M, Kumbaraci M, Bilgin E, Hancioğlu S, Kalenderer Ö. Reliability of Evaluation of the Surgeon-Dependent Factors Affecting mechanical failure after intertrochanteric femur fracture treatment. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2022;89:75-80. Go to original source...
  28. Van Balen R, Steyerberg E, Polder J, Ribbers T, Habbema J, Cools H. Hip fracture in elderly patients: outcomes for function, quality of life, and type of residence. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;390:232-243. Go to original source...
  29. Yoo J, Chang J, Park C, Hwang J. Risk factors associated with failure of cephalomedullary nail fixation in the treatment of trochanteric hip fractures. Clin Orthop Surg. 2020;12:29-36. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Zehir S, Şahin E, Zehir R. Comparison of clinical outcomes with three different intramedullary nailing devices in the treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2015;21:469-476. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...