Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2025; 92(4):226-230 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2025/025
Inclusion of AMIS surgical approach in the Methods Used for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Learning Curve, Risks, Surgical TechniqueOriginal papers
- Ortopedické oddělení, NH Hospital a.s., Hořovice
Purpose of the study: The study aims to point out the risks and matters associated with the inclusion of a new anterior approach in total hip replacement methods and to determine when and whether the values of investigated parameters would come close to those of the established surgical technique. Another aim was to compare the blood loss in AMIS and DLA approaches.
Material and methods: The study covers 62 total hip arthroplasties in a breakdown by surgical approach. It investigated the progress of the entire surgical team - surgeon's learning curve, time curve of preparation for surgery, placement of the acetabular component, blood loss, and postoperative haemoglobin drop. The control group consisted of patients in whom the established surgical technique, i.e. the direct lateral approach, was used. The component placement was assessed on standard centered AP view radiographs of the operated joint by using the ellipse method to calculate the Liaw's anteversion and inclination.
Results: A total of 62 surgeries were included in the study. The AMIS group (31 surgical procedures) was composed of 19 women and 12 men, with the mean age of 70 years. The preparation of the operating field took 11.5 minutes on average and the duration of surgery from incision to suture was 66 minutes. The blood loss reached 295 ml, with the mean Hb drop of 16 g/l. The mean anteversion and inclination were 22° and 43°, respectively. The DLA group (31 surgical procedures) was composed of 14 women and 17 men, with the mean age of 67.5 years. The preparation of the operating field took 8 minutes on average and the duration of surgery from incision to suture was 53 minutes. The blood loss reached 300 ml, with the mean Hb drop of 21 g/l. The mean anteversion and inclination were 17° and 43°, respectively. The duration of the 1st to 10th AMIS surgeries was 80 minutes; the duration of the 11th to 20th surgeries was 58 minutes; and in the case of the 21st to 31st surgeries it was 55 minutes.
Conclusions: The results showed that there is no need to worry about an excessively long learning curve of the surgeon and the entire team when introducing a new surgical procedure as long as they have a positive attitude thereto. The data obtained in other countries reveal that the AMIS approach is on the rise ever more often. The authors therefore hope that this study will contribute to its widespread adoption.
Keywords: anteversion, inclination, total hip arthroplasty, haemoglobin, learning curve.
Received: January 22, 2025; Revised: January 22, 2025; Accepted: May 25, 2025; Published: August 1, 2025 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- Amlie E, Havelin LI, Furnes O, Baste V, Nordsletten L, Hovik O, Dimmen S. Worse patient-reported outcome after lateral approach than after anterior and posterolateral approach in primary hip arthroplasty: a cross sectional questionnaire study of 1,476 patients 1-3 years after surgery. Acta Orthop. 2014;85:463-469.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Brunello M, Di Martino A, Ruta F, Ferri R, Rossomando V, D'Agostino C, Pederiva D, Schilardi F, Faldini C. Which patient benefit most from minimally invasive direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty in terms of perioperative blood loss? A retrospective comparative study from a cohort of patients with primary degenerative hips. Musculoskelet Surg. 2023;107:431-437.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Burapachaisri A, Elbuluk A, Abotsi E, Pierrepont J, Jerabek SA, Buckland AJ, Vigdorchik JM. Lewinnek safe zone references are frequently misquoted. Arthroplast. Today. 2020;6:945-953.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- DeSteiger RN, Lorimer M, Solomon M. What is the learning curve for the anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015;473:3860-3866.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- DiMartino A, Brunello M, Pederiva D, Schilardi F, Rossomando V, Cataldi P, D'Agostino C, Genco R, Faldini C. Fast track protocols and early rehabilitation after surgery in total hip arthroplasty: a narrative review. Clin Pract. 2023;13:569-582.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- DiMartino A, Stefanini N, Brunello M, Bordini B, Pilla F, Geraci G, D'Agostino C, Ruta F, Faldini C. Is the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty effective in pbese patients? Early clinical and radiographic results from a retrospective comparative study. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023;59:769.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Faldini C, Rossomando V, Brunello M, D'Agostino C, Ruta F, Pilla F, Traina F, Di Martino A. Anterior minimally invasive approach (AMIS) for total hip arthroplasty: analysis of the first 1000 consecutive patients operated at a high volume center. J Clin Med. 2024;13:2617.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Foissey C, Fauvernier M, Fary C, Servien E, Lustig S, Batailler C. Total hip arthroplasty performed by direct anterioraApproach: does experience influence the learning curve? SICOT J. 2020;6:15.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Higgins BT, Barlow DR, Heagerty NE, Lin TJ. Anterior vs. posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30:419-434.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Komnos GA, Manrique J, Foltz C, Klement MR, Restrepo C, Parvizi J. Transfusion rates in total hip arthroplasty are lower in patients with direct anterior approach. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2021;9:659-664.
- Kucukdurmaz F, Sukeik M, Parvizi J. A meta-analysis comparing the direct anterior with other approaches in primary total hip arthroplasty. Surgeon. 2019;17:291-299.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Lesur E., Laude F. Arthroplastie totale de hanche par voie antérieure et son évolution mini-invasive. EMC Rhumatol Orthop. 2004;1:445-453.
Go to original source...
- Lin CH, Chen WC, Weng PW, Huang YM, Liaw CK. Liaw's ellipse anteversion method for distinguishing acetabular component retroversion from anteversion on plain radiographs. Orthop Surg. 2024;16:276-281.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Matta JM, Shahrdar C, Ferguson T. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:115-124.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Moretti VM, Post ZD. Surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty. Indian J Orthop. 2017;51:368-376.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Müller DA, Zingg PO, Dora C. Anterior minimally invasive approach for total hip replacement: five-year survivorship and learning curve. Hip Int. 2014;24:277-283.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Noble PC, Alexander JW, Lindahl LJ, Yew DT, Granberry WM, Tullos HS. The anatomic basis of femoral component design. Clin Orthop Relat Res.1988;235:148-165.
Go to original source...
- Palásek P, Mašát P, Řeháček V. Totální endoprotéza kyčelního kloubu za použití AMIS přístupu: operační technika, vhodnost přístupu u obézních pacientů, hodnocení souboru. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2024;91:24-33.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Park YS, Shin WC, Lee SM, Kwak SH, Bae JY, Suh KT. The best method for evaluating anteversion of the acetabular compo nent after total hip arthroplasty on plain radiographs. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13:66.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Parvizi J, Restrepo C, Maltenfort MG. Total hip arthroplasty performed through direct anterior approach provides superior early outcome: results of a randomized, prospective study. Orthop Clin North Am. 2016;47:497-504.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Peters RM, Ten Have BLEF, Rykov K, Van Steenbergen L, Putter H, Rutgers M, Vos S, Van Steijnen B, Poolman RW, Vehmeijer SBW, Zijlstra WP. The learning curve of the direct anterior approach is 100 cases: an analysis based on 15,875 total hip arthroplasties in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2022;93:775-782.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Rachbauer F, Kain MS, Leunig M. The history of the anterior approach to the hip. Orthop Clin North Am. 2009;40:311-320.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Rilby K, Nauclér E, Mohaddes M, Kärrholm J. No difference in outcome or migration but greater loss of bone mineral density with the collum femoris preserving stem compared with the corail stem: a randomized controlled trial with five-year follow-up. Bone Joint J. 2022;104-B:581-588.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Stolarczyk A, Stolarczyk M, Stepinski P, Dorocinska MK, Swiercz M, Szymczak J, Żarnovsky K, Żuchniewicz A, Maciąg BM. The direct anterior approach to primary total hip replacement: radiological analysis in comparison to other approaches. J Clin Med. 2021;10: 2246.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...