Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2021; 88(2):117-123 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2021/020

Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Concentrations of Diclofenac Sodium Phonophoresis (1.16% vs 2.32%) in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: a Randomized Double-Blind Controlled TrialOriginal papers

S. TOLU1,*, M. M. KÖSE2, M. C. KORKMAZ3, A. ÜŞEN1, A. REZVANİ1
1 Istanbul Medipol University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Istanbul, Turkey
2 Karaman Medical Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Karaman, Turkey
3 Başakşehir Cam and Sakura State Hospital, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Istanbul, Turkey

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:
The objective of the present study is to compare the efficacy of two different concentrations of diclofenac sodium phonophoresis (DSPH) (1.16% vs 2.32%) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA).

MATERIAL AND METHODS:
A randomized, double-blind, controlled design was applied. Ninety patients (mean age± SD, 59.98 ± 8.89 years) who had Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grades II to III knee OA were randomly allocated into three groups; 1.16% DSPH, 2.32% DSPH, TUS (30 in each group). Each patient was treated five sessions per week for two weeks. A 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) for usual pain and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) were evaluated before and after treatment in all groups.

RESULTS:
The VAS pain and WOMAC scores were significantly improved after treatment in all groups (p < 0.05). The 2.32% DSPH showed more significant effects than the 1.16% DSPH, both in improving WOMAC-pain and physical function scores (p = 0.020, p = 0.008) and reducing the VAS pain measure, although it did not reach the level of significance (p = 0.077). The 2.32% DSPH was superior to the TUS, both in reducing the VAS pain measure (p < 0.001) and in improving WOMAC-pain, stiffness, physical function and total scores (p = 0.022, p = 0.016, p < 0.001, p < 0.001 respectively). 1.16% DSPH significantly reduced stiffness and physical function scores compared with TUS (p = 0.042, p = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS:
DSPH and TUS are effective treatments for knee OA. Our results indicated that 2.32% DSPH produces additional benefits to functional improvement and pain reduction compared with 1.16% DSPH in K-L grades II to III knee OA.

Keywords: diclofenac sodium, knee osteoarthritis, phonophoresis, therapeutic ultrasound, topical formulation

Published: April 15, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
TOLU S, KÖSE MM, KORKMAZ MC, ÜŞEN A, REZVANİ A. Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Concentrations of Diclofenac Sodium Phonophoresis (1.16% vs 2.32%) in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis: a Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2021;88(2):117-123. doi: 10.55095/achot2021/020. PubMed PMID: 33960924.
Download citation

References

  1. Akinbo S, Owoeye O, Adesegun S. Comparison of the therapeutic efficacy of diclofenac sodium and methyl salicylate phonophoresis in the management of knee osteoarthritis. Turk J Rheumatol. 2011;26:111-119. Go to original source...
  2. Altman R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K, Christy W, Cooke TD, Greenwald R, Hochberg M, Howell D, Kaplan D, Koopman W, Longley S III, Mankin H, Mcshane DJ, Medsger T Jr., Meenan R, Mikkelsen W, Mqskowitz R, Murphy W, Rothschild B, Segal M, Sokoloff L, Wolfe F. Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Classification of osteoarthritis of the knee. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Criteria Committee of the American Rheumatism Association. Arthritis Rheum. 1986;29:1039-1049. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Bannuru RR, Osani MC, Vaysbrot EE, Arden NK, Bennell K, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, Kraus VB, Lohmander LS, Abbott JH, Bhandari M, Blanco FJ, Espinosa R, Haugen IK, J Lin J, Mandl LA, Moilanen E, Nakamura N, Snyder-Mackler L, Trojian T, Underwood M, McAlindon TE. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee, hip, and polyarticular osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019;27:1578-1589. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Bellamy N. WOMAC: a 20-year experiential review of a patient-centered self-reported health status questionnaire. J Rheumatol. 2002;29:2473-2476. Go to PubMed...
  5. Boyaci A, Tutoglu A, Boyaci N, Aridici R, Koca I. Comparison of the efficacy of ketoprofen phonophoresis, ultrasound, and short-wave diathermy in knee osteoarthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2013;33:2811-2818. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Cage SA, Rupp KA, Castel JC, Saliba EN, Hertel J, Saliba SA (2013) Relative acoustic transmission of topical preparations used with therapeutic ultrasound. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:2126-2130 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Coskun Benlidayi I, Gokcen N, Basaran S. Comparative short-term effectiveness of ibuprofen gel and cream phonophoresis in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2018;38:1927-1932. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Deniz S, Topuz O, Atalay NS, Sarsan A, Yildiz N, Findikoglu G, Karaca O, Ardic F. Comparison of the effectiveness of pulsed and continuous diclofenac phonophoresis in treatment of knee osteoarthritis. J Phys Ther Sci. 2009;21:331-336. Go to original source...
  9. Goraj-Szczypiorowska B, Zajac L, Skalska-Izdebska R. Evaluation of factors influencing the quality and efficacy of ultrasound and phonophoresis treatment. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2007;9:449-458. Go to PubMed...
  10. Hagen M, Baker M. Skin penetration and tissue permeation after topical administration of diclofenac. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017;33;1623-1634. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Hunter DJ, Bierma-Zeinstra S. Osteoarthritis. Lancet. 2019;393:1745-1759. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteoarthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957;16:494-502. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Kolasinski SL, Neogi T, Hochberg MC, Oatis C, Guyatt G, Block J, Callahan L, Copenhaver C, Dodge C, Felson D, Gellar K, Harvey WF, Hawker G, Herzig E, Kwoh CK, Nelson AE, Samuels J, Scanzello C, White D, Wise B, Altman RD, DiRenzo D, Fontanarosa J, Giradi G, Ishimori M, Misra D, Shah AA, Shmagel AK, Thoma LM, Turgunbaev M, Turner AS, Reston J. 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation Guideline for the Management of Osteoarthritis of the Hand, Hip, and Knee. Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) 2020;72:220-233. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Kozanoglu E, Basaran S, Guzel R, Guler-Uysal F. Short term efficacy of ibuprofen phonophoresis versus continuous ultrasound therapy in knee osteoarthritis. Swiss Med Wkly. 2003;133:333-338. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Luksurapan W, Boonhong J. Effects of phonophoresis of piroxicam and ultrasound on symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:250-255. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Meshali M, Abdel-Aleem H, Sakr F, Nazzal S, El-Malah Y. Effect of gel composition and phonophoresis on the transdermal delivery of ibuprofen: in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Pharm Dev Technol. 2011;16:93-101. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Pradal J, Vallet CM, Frappin G, Bariguian F, Lombardi MS. Importance of the formulation in the skin delivery of topical diclofenac: not all topical diclofenac formulations are the same. J Pain Res. 2019;12:1149-1154. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Revel FB, Fayet M, Hagen M. Topical diclofenac, an efficacious treatment for osteoarthritis: a narrative review. Rheumatol Ther. 2020;7:217-236. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Schmidt TW. Approach to osteoarthritis management for the primary care provider. Prim Care. 2018;45:361-378. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Tüzün EH, Eker L, Aytar A, Daşkapan A, Bayramoğlu M. Acceptability, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Turkish version of WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. 2005;13:28-33. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Vina ER, Kwoh CK. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: literature update. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2018;30:160-167. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Wadsworth LT, Kent JD, Holt RJ. Efficacy and safety of diclofenac sodium 2% topical solution for osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, 4 week study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016;32:241-250. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Wu Y, Zhu S, Lv Z, Kan S, Wu Q, Song W, Ning G, Feng S. Effects of therapeutic ultrasound for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33:1863-1875. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Yang JH, Kim DK, Yun MY, Kim TY, Shin SC. Transdermal delivery system of triamcinolone acetonide from a gel using phonophoresis. Arch Pharm Res. 2006;29:412-417. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Yildiz N, Atalay NS, Gungen GO, Sanal E, Akkaya N, Topuz O. Comparison of ultrasound and ketoprofen phonophoresis in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2011;24:39-47. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...