Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2021; 88(5):333-338 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2021/049

Comparison of Modified Transiliac Internal Fixators: Mechanical Testing on Pelvic ModelsOriginal papers

M. SALÁŠEK, L. LOBOVSKÝ*, J. HLUCHÁ, J. KRYSTEK, J. KŘEN
NTIS - New Technologies for the Information Society, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of West Bohemia, Plzeň, Czech Republic

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY:
Vertically unstable transforaminal sacral fractures can be stabilized with several types of transiliac internal fixators (TIFI): the classical one (TIFI-C), the supraacetabular one (TIFI-A) and by dual application of TIFI (DTIFI).

MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Pelvic models made of solid foam (Sawbones 1301) were used in the study. Mechanical loading tests were performed in order to assess the stiffness of the studied pelvic structures. The stiffness of the intact model was approximated as the slope of load/displacement curve. Then vertically unstable right-sided linear transforaminal fracture was created and subsequently fixed by TIFI-C, TIFI-A and DTIFI (each fixator for a separate model). The fixation techniques were compared based on the ratio between the stiffness of the treated and of the intact pelvis. Motion of the posterior pelvic structures and their deformations were measured using a photogrammetric system with four synchronous cameras. Loads applied at the base of sacrum and sacral base displacements were recorded by the testing device and used to assess the stiffness of the model structure. A dedicated load cell and a monoaxial extensometer were utilised. Every measurement was repeated at least 10 times. Obtained data were analysed by one way ANOVA test with post hoc comparison by Tukey HSD test.

RESULTS:
Mean stiffness ratio (±1SD) of pelvic structure was 0.638 ± 0.005 for TIFI-C, 0.722 ± 0.014 for TIFI-A and 0.720 ± 0.008 for DTIFI. Dual transiliac internal fixation and supraacetabular fixation were superior to the classical one (p < 0.0001), but DTIFI and TIFI-A stiffness ratios were statistically equivalent (p = 0.9112).

CONCLUSIONS:
Results of the mechanical analysis using pelvic models indicate that for linear vertical transforaminal sacral fracture without comminuted zone, an application of either TIFI-A or DTIFI provides significantly higher stiffness of the lateral pelvic segment than application of TIFI-C.

Keywords: transforaminal sacral fracture, transiliac internal fixator, dual TIFI, stability, biomechanics, digital image correlation

Published: October 15, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
SALÁŠEK M, LOBOVSKÝ L, HLUCHÁ J, KRYSTEK J, KŘEN J. Comparison of Modified Transiliac Internal Fixators: Mechanical Testing on Pelvic Models. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2021;88(5):333-338. doi: 10.55095/achot2021/049. PubMed PMID: 34738891.
Download citation

References

  1. Boudissa M, Saad M, Kerschbaumer G, Ruatti S, Tonetti J. Posterior transiliac plating in vertically unstable sacral fracture. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020;106:85-88. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Chen H, Wu L, Zheng R, Liu Y, Li Y, Ding Z. Parallel analysis of finite element model controlled trial and retrospective case control study on percutaneous internal fixation for vertical sacral fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:217. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Dienstknecht T, Berner A, Lenich A, Zellner J, Mueller M, Nerlich M, Fuechtmeier B. Biomechanical analysis of a transiliac internal fixator. IntOrthop. 2011;35:1863-1868. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Eastman JG, Shelton TJ, Routt MLC Jr, Adams MR. Posterior pelvic ring bone density with implications for percutaneous screw fixation. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021;31:383-389. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Füchtmeier B, Maghsudi M, Neumann C, Hente R, Roll C, Nerlich M. Die minimal-invasive Stabilisierung des dorsalen Beckenrings mit dem transiliakalen Fixateur interne (TIFI) - operative Technik und erste klinische Ergebnisse. Unfallchirurg. 2004;107:1142-1151. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Giráldez-Sánchez MA, Lázaro-Gonzálvez Á, Martínez-Reina J, Serrano-Toledano D, Navarro-Robles A, Cano-Luis P, Fragkakis EM, Giannoudis PV. Percutaneous iliosacral fixation in external rotational pelvic fractures, a biomechanical analysis. Injury. 2015;46:327-332. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. https://www.sawbones.com/full-male-pelvis-large-solid-foam-w-sacrum-1301.html
  8. Korovessis P, Stamatakis M, Baikousis A. Posterior stabilization of unstable sacroiliac injuries with the Texas Scottish Rite Hospital spinal instrumentation. Orthopedics. 2000;23:323-327. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Liuzza F, Silluzio N, Florio M, El Ezzo O, Cazzato G, Ciolli G, Perisano C, Maccauro G. Comparison between posterior sacral plate stabilization versus minimally invasive transiliac-transsacral lag-screw fixation in fractures of sacrum: a single-centre experience. Int Orthop. 2019;43:177-185. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Osterhoff G, Tiziani S, Hafner C, Ferguson SJ, Simmen HP, Werner CM. Symphyseal internal rod fixation versus standard plate fixation for open book pelvic ring injuries: a biomechanical study. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016;42:197-202. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Peng Y, Zhang G, Zhang S, Ji X, Li J, Du C, Zhao W, Zhang L. Biomechanical study of transsacral-transiliac screw fixation versus lumbopelvic fixation and bilateral triangular fixation for "H"- and "U"-type sacrum fractures with traumatic spondylopelvic dissociation: a finite element analysis study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16:428. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Rommens PM, Wagner D, Hofmann A. Minimal Invasive Surgical Treatment of Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2017;112:524-537. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Santolini E, Kanakaris NK, Giannoudis PV. Sacral fractures: issues, challenges, solutions. EFORT Open Rev. 2020;5:299-311. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Schmitz P, Baumann F, Grechenig S, Gaensslen A, Nerlich M, Müller MB. The cement-augmented transiliacal internal fixator (caTIFI): an innovative surgical technique for stabilization of fragility fractures of the pelvis. Injury. 2015;46:S114-S120. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Song W, Zhou D, He Y. The biomechanical advantages of bilateral lumbo-iliac fixation in unilateral comminuted sacral fractures without sacroiliac screw safe channel: a finite element analysis. Medicine. 2016;95:e5026. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Tempelaere C, Vincent C, Court C. Percutaneous posterior fixation for unstable pelvic ring fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103:1169-1171. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Toda K, Yagata Y, Kikuchi T, Takigawa T, Ito Y. Minimally invasive surgery for unstable pelvic ring fractures: transiliac rod and screw fixation. Acta Med Okayama. 2020;74:27-32. Go to PubMed...
  18. Ueno FH, Pisani MJ, Machado AN, Rodrigues FL, Fujiki EN, Rodrigues LM. Biomechanical study of the sacroiliac fracture fixation with titanium rods and pedicle screws. Acta Ortop Bras. 2015;23:154-157. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Vigdorchik JM, Jin X, Sethi A, Herzog DT, Oliphant BW, Yang KH, Vaidya R. A biomechanical study of standard posterior pelvic ring fixation versus a posterior pedicle screw construct. Injury. 2015;46:1491-1496. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Wu XT, Liu ZQ, Fu WQ, Zhao S. Minimally invasive treatment of unstable pelvic ring injuries with modified pedicle screw-rod fixator. J Int Med Res. 2018;46:368-380. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Zhu L, Wang L, Shen D, Ye TW, Zhao LY, Chen AM. Treatment of pelvic fractures through a less invasive ilioinguinal approach combined with a minimally invasive posterior approach. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:167. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...