Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2023; 90(4):233-238 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2023/028

Comprehensive Analysis of Scientific Output in Hip and Knee ArthroscopyOriginal papers

M. A. WOLF1, D. MILLENAAR2, P. WINTER1, F. MAHFOUD2, S. LANDGRAEBER1
1 Department of Orthopaedics and Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Saarland, Homburg, Germany
2 Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Saarland, Homburg, Germany

Purpose of the study
A global bibliometric comparison of the level of scientific interest and output in the two research areas hip and knee arthroscopy (H-ASC and K-ASC) was carried out. In addition, the different degrees of publication activity in the countries and institutes performing this research were investigated.
Material and methods
Publications from 1945-2020 listed in the Web of Science Core Collection were included in the study. Using the web application Science Performance Evaluation (SciPE), quantitative and qualitative aspects were evaluated. Subsequently, the date of publication, author information, and other metadata were analysed.
Results
Since 1945, 3,924 studies have been published on K-ASC and 2,163 on H-ASC. The majority of the publications which have appeared since 2016 dealt with the topic of H-ASC (H-ASC: 241.2 publications/year; K-ASC: 217.4 publications/year). The USA published the most on both topics (H-ASC: 1,123 publications; K-ASC: 1,078 publications). More countries and institutes participated in K-ASC (3,008 institutes, 82 countries) than in H-ASC (103 institutes, 57 countries). The ten institutes with the most publications accounted for 36.71% and 12.34% of all publications on H-ASC and K-ASC, respectively. H-ASC received 78.12% of its funding from private sponsors while K-ASC was supported mainly by governmental/non-profit sponsors (70.92%).
Conclusions
This study provides the first scientific comparison between H-ASC and K-ASC. Measured by qualitative and quantitative aspects, K-ASC was the most flourishing research area overall. In the last ten to five years, interest has shifted towards H-ASC with an increasing number of publications and a higher rate of citations.

Keywords: knee arthroscopy, hip arthroscopy, bibliometric comparison.

Published: August 15, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
WOLF MA, MILLENAAR D, WINTER P, MAHFOUD F, LANDGRAEBER S. Comprehensive Analysis of Scientific Output in Hip and Knee Arthroscopy. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2023;90(4):233-238. doi: 10.55095/achot2023/028. PubMed PMID: 37690036.
Download citation

References

  1. Abrams GD, Frank RM, Gupta AK, Harris JD, McCormick FM, Cole BJ. Trends in meniscus repair and meniscectomy in the United States, 2005-2011. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:2333-2339. Go to original source...
  2. Angell M. Publish or perish: A proposal. Ann Intern Med. 1986;10:261-262. Go to original source...
  3. Bircher E. Die Arthroendoskopie. Zentralbl Chir. 1921;48:1460-1461.
  4. Bohlen AB, Vitzthum K, Mache S, Quarcoo D, Scutaru C, Groneberg DA. Eine szientometrische Betrachtung des BMI [Scientometric analysis of the BMI]. Z Gastroenterol. 2010;48:1285-1292. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Burman MS. Arthroscopy or the direct visualization of joints. J Bone Joint Surg. 1931;13:669-695.
  6. Clarivate Analytics: Journal Citation Reports; Category Orthopedics. Accessed 2021. Available at: https://jcr.clarivate.com/JCRHomePageAction.action?.
  7. Cullen KA, Hall MJ, Golosinskiy A. Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 2006. Natl Health Stat Report. 2009;11:1-25.
  8. Cvetanovich GL, Fillingham YA, Harris JD, Erickson BJ, Verma NN, Bach BR Jr. Publication and level of evidence trends in the American Journal of Sports Medicine from 1996 to 2011. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:220-225. Go to original source...
  9. de Sa D, Horner NS, MacDonald A, Simunovic N, Slobogean G, Philippon MJ, Belzile EL, Karlsson J, Ayeni OR. Evaluating healthcare resource utilization and outcomes for surgical hip dislocation and hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24:3943-3954. Go to original source...
  10. Dong F, Fan M, Jia Z. Fifty top-cited fracture articles from China: a systematic review and bibliometric analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2016;11:71. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Dumont GD, Cohn RM, Gross MM, Menge TJ, Battle NC, Thier ZT. The learning curve in hip arthroscopy: effect on surgical times in a single-surgeon cohort. Arthroscopy. 2020;36:1293-1298. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Grauwin S, Jensen P. Mapping scientific institutions. Scientometrics. 2011;89:943-954. Go to original source...
  13. Griffin DR, Dickenson EJ, Wall PDH, Achana F, Donovan JL, Griffin J, Hobson R, Hutchinson CE, Jepson M, Parsons NR, Petrou S, Realpe A, Smith J, Foster NE; FASHIoN Study Group. Hip arthroscopy versus best conservative care for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (UK FASHIoN): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;391:2225-2235. Go to original source...
  14. Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:16569-16572. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Holzer LA, Holzer G. The 50 highest cited papers in hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:453-457. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Holzer LA, Leithner A, Holzer G. The most cited papers in osteoporosis and related research. J Osteoporos. 2015;2015:638934. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Huo YQ, Pan XH, Li QB, Wang XQ, Jiao XJ, Jia ZW, Wang SJ. Fifty top-cited classic papers in orthopedic elbow surgery: A bibliometric analysis. Int J Surg. 2015;18:28-33. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Joyce CW, Kelly JC, Sugrue C. A bibliometric analysis of the 100 most influential papers in burns. Burns. 2014;40:30-37. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Kautzner J, Zeman P, Stančák A, Havlas V. Hip arthroscopy learning curve: a prospective single-surgeon study. Int Orthop. 2018;42:777-782. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Kim HJ, Yoon DY, Kim ES, Lee K, Bae JS, Lee JH. The 100 most-cited articles in neuroimaging: a bibliometric analysis. Neuroimage. 2016;139:149-156. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Kirkley A, Birmingham TB, Litchfield RB, Giffin JR, Willits KR, Wong CJ, Feagan BG, Donner A, Griffin SH, D'Ascanio LM, Pope JE, Fowler PJ. A randomized trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1097-1107. Go to original source...
  22. Lefaivre KA, Shadgan B, O'Brien PJ. 100 most cited articles in orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:1487-1497. Go to original source...
  23. Lei J, Yu P, Xu B, Wang R, Shen Z, Jia Z, Tian J. Worldwide research productivity in nuclear medicine literature. Nuklearmedizin. 2018;57:234-241. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Li K, Rollins J, Yan E. Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997-2017: a selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis. Scientometrics. 2018;115:1-20. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Lum ZC, Pereira GC, Giordani M, Meehan JP. Top 100 most cited articles in orthopaedic surgery: An update. J Orthop. 2019;19:132-137. Go to original source...
  26. Matsuda DK, Carlisle JC, Arthurs SC, Wierks CH, Philippon MJ. Comparative systematic review of the open dislocation, mini-open, and arthroscopic surgeries for femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy. 2011;27:252-269. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Mehta N, Chamberlin P, Marx RG, Hidaka C, Ge Y, Nawabi DH, Lyman S. Defining the learning curve for hip arthroscopy: a threshold analysis of the volume-outcomes relationship. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46:1284-1293. Go to original source...
  28. Moseley JB, O'Malley K, Petersen NJ, Menke TJ, Brody BA, Kuykendall DH, Hollingsworth JC, Ashton CM, Wray NP. A controlled trial of arthroscopic surgery for osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:81-88. Go to original source...
  29. Nelkin D. Publication and promotion. The performance of science. Lancet. 1998;352:893. Go to original source...
  30. Nordentöft S. Ueber Endoskopie Geschlossener Höhlen. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1913;39:1840-1841. Go to original source...
  31. Ohlendorf D, Mayer S, Klingelhöfer D, Schwarzer M, Groneberg DA. Arthrose: Eine szientometrische Analyse. Orthopade. 2015;44:71-79. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Rodríguez-Sanjuán JC, Gómez-Ruiz M, Trugeda-Carrera S, Manuel-Palazuelos C, López-Useros A, Gómez-Fleitas M. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: present and future directions. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:1975-2004. Go to original source...
  33. Schöffel N, Gfroerer S, Rolle U, Bendels MH, Klingelhöfer D, Groneberg-Kloft B. Hirschsprung disease: critical evaluation of the global research architecture employing scientometrics and density-equalizing mapping. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2017;27:185-191. Go to original source...
  34. Scholz SS, Dillmann M, Flohr A, Backes C, Fehlmann T, Millenaar D, Ukena C, Böhm M, Keller A, Mahfoud F. Contemporary scientometric analyses using a novel web application: the science performance evaluation (SciPE) approach. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020;109:810-818. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. The Top 10 Countries That Dominate Natural-Sciences Research. Nature, 2019.
  36. Thorlund JB, Hare KB, Lohmander LS. Large increase in arthroscopic meniscus surgery in the middle-aged and older population in Denmark from 2000 to 2011. Acta Orthop. 2014;85:287-292. Go to original source...
  37. UniRank. Universities search engine. Accessed 2021 https://www.4icu.org/
  38. van Eck NJ, Waltman L. CitNetExplorer: a new software tool for analyzing and visualizing citation networks. J Informetr. 2014;8:802-823. Go to original source...
  39. van Noorden R. Global scientific output doubles every nine years. Nature news blog. Published 2014. Accessed 2021 http://blogs.nature.com/news/2014/05/global-scientific-output-doubles-every-nine-years.html
  40. Web of Science: The world´s largest publisher-neutral citation index and research intelligence platform. Accessed 2021. http://apps.webofknowledge.com/WOS_GeneralSearch_input.do?product=WOS&search_mode=GeneralSearch&SID=E3hsNfMGbhg6itKsgK7≺eferencesSaved=
  41. Zhang W, Tang N, Li X, George DM, He G, Huang T. The top 100 most cited articles on total hip arthroplasty: a bibliometric analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019;14:412 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  42. Zhang Y, Wumaier M, He D, Xiao B, Zhang J. The 100 top-cited articles on spinal deformity: a bibliometric analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020;45:275-283. Go to original source...
  43. Zhu J, Liu W. A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics. 2020;123:321-335. Go to original source...