Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2024; 91(4):239-244 | DOI: 10.55095/achot2024/032

Vliv orientace hrotu korakoidu na výskyt trhlin šlachy m. subscapularis: studie založená na MRI

H. YAKA1, M. ÖZER1, B. SARIKAYA2, U. KANATLI3
1 Necmettin Erbakan University School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Konya, Turkey
2 Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Ankara, Turkey
3 Gazi University School of Medicine, Department of Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Ankara, Turkey

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: This study investigated the relationship between the position of the tip of the coracoid process (CP) relative to the glenoid with subscapularis (Ssc) tears. We hypothesized that the coracoid tip is more inferior, lateral and posterior in patients with Ssc tear.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: This research enrolled 34 isolated Ssc tears and 44 controls. We introduced the axial central glenoid-coracoid angle (acGCA) and sagittal central glenoid-coracoid angle (scGCA) to evaluate the position of the tip of the CP relative to the glenoid center on MRI images. In both groups, acGCA, scGCA on MRI and critical shoulder angle (CSA), glenoid inclination (GI) on true anterior-posterior shoulder radiography were evaluated.

RESULTS: When both groups were compared in terms of acGCA, the acGCA values of the Ssc tear group were significantly higher than the control group (p<0.001). The best cut-off value of acGCA for Ssc tears was 28.3°. acGCA values higher than 28.3° showed 93.3% sensitivity and 93.1% specificity for Ssc tears (likelihood ratio:13.53, AUC: 0.979, 95% CI of AUC: 0.950-0.999). In terms of acGCA, the power analysis between Ssc tears group and control group was 99.9% between Ssc tears and the control group (effect size d=2.63). When both groups were compared in terms of scGCA, the scGCA values of the Ssc tear group were significantly higher than the control group (p<0.001). The best cut-off value of scGCA for Ssc tears was 41.4°. Scores of scGCA greater than 41.8° showed 80% sensitivity and 89.7% specificity for Ssc tears (likelihood ratio: 7.73, AUC: 0.899 95% CI of AUC: 0.837-0.958). In terms of scGCA, the power analysis between Ssc tear and control group was 99.8% (effect size d=1.23). When both groups were compared in terms of CSA and GI; CSA and GI values in the Ssc tear group were significantly higher (p<0.001 and p<0.012, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS: AcGCA values higher than 28.3° indicate that the coracoid tip is located more laterally and posteriorly; scGCA values higher than 41.8° indicate that the coracoid tip is located more inferiorly and these two new indexes are showing that more laterally, posteriorly and inferiorly coracoid tip is related to subscapularis tears.

Klíčová slova: coracoid process, subscapularis tear, coracoid morphology, scapula morphology.

Vloženo: 9. květen 2024; Revidováno: 9. květen 2024; Přijato: 13. červenec 2024; Zveřejněno: 13. září 2024  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
YAKA H, ÖZER M, SARIKAYA B, KANATLI U. Vliv orientace hrotu korakoidu na výskyt trhlin šlachy m. subscapularis: studie založená na MRI. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2024;91(4):239-244. doi: 10.55095/achot2024/032. PubMed PMID: 39342646.
Stáhnout citaci

Reference

  1. Ayanaoğlu T, Ataoğlu B, Özer M, Çetinkaya M, Kaptan AY, Kanatli U. Is routine coracoplasty necessary in isolated subscapularis tears? Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi. 2019;30:11-26.
  2. Brunkhorst JP, Giphart JE, LaPrade RF, Millett PJ. Coracohumeral distances and correlation to arm rotation: an in vivo 3-dimensional biplane fluoroscopy study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2013;1:2325967113496059. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  3. Cetinkaya M, Ataoglu MB, Ozer M, Ayanoglu T, Kanatli U. Subscapularis tendon slip number and coracoid overlap are more related parameters for subcoracoid impingement in subscapularis tears: a magnetic resonance imaging comparison study. Arthro­scopy. 2017;33:734-742. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  4. Chalmers PN, Beck L, Granger E, Henninger H, Tashjian RZ. Superior glenoid inclination and rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018;27:1444-1450. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  5. Garavaglia G, Ufenast H, Taverna E. The frequency of subscapularis tears in arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: a retrospective study comparing magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopic findings. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2011;5:90-94. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  6. Gerber C, Terrier F, Ganz R. The role of the coracoid process in the chronic impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985;67:703-708. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  7. Gerber C, Terrier F, Zehnder R, Ganz R. The subcoracoid space: an anatomic study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;215:132-138. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  8. Ide J, Tokiyoshi A, Hirose J, Mizuta H. Arthroscopic repair of traumatic combined rotator cuff tears involving the subscapularis tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:2378-2388. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  9. Leite MJ, Pinho AR, Sá MC, Silva MR, Sousa AN, Torres JM. Coracoid morphology and humeral version as risk factors for subscapularis tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020;29:1804-1810. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  10. Maurer A, Fucentese SF, Pfirrmann CW, Wirth SH, Djahangiri A, Jost B, Gerber C. Assessment of glenoid inclination on routine clinical radiographs and computed tomography examinations of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21:1096-1103. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  11. Moor BK, Röthlisberger M, Müller D, Zumstein M, Bouaicha S, Ehlinger M, Gerber C. Age, trauma and the critical shoulder angle accurately predict supraspinatus tendon tears. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100:489-494. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  12. Moroder P, Ernstbrunner L, Pomwenger W, Oberhauser F, Hitzl W, Tauber M, Resch H, Moroder R. Anterior shoulder instability is associated with an underlying deficiency of the bony glenoid concavity. Arthroscopy. 2015;31:1223-1231. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  13. Narasimhan R, Shamse K, Nash C, Dhingra D, Kennedy S. Pre­valence of subscapularis tears and accuracy of shoulder ultrasound in pre-operative diagnosis. Int Orthop. 2016;40:975-979. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  14. Osti L, Soldati F, Del Buono A, Massari L. Subcoracoid impingement and subscapularis tendon: is there any truth? Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2013;3:101-105. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  15. Park J-Y, Lhee S-H, Oh K-S, Kim NR, Hwang J-T. Is arthroscopic coracoplasty necessary in subcoracoid impingement syndrome? Arthroscopy. 2012;28:1766-1775. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  16. Tashjian RZ. Epidemiology, natural history, and indications for treatment of rotator cuff tears. Clin Sports Med. 2012;31:589-604. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  17. Tollemar VC, Wang J, Koh JL, Lee MJ, Shi LL. Coracoid morphology is not associated with subscapularis tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020;29:1162-1167. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...
  18. Watson AC, Jamieson RP, Mattin AC, Page RS. Magnetic resonance imaging based coracoid morphology and its associations with subscapularis tears: a new index. Shoulder Elbow. 2019;11(1 Suppl):52-58. Přejít k původnímu zdroji... Přejít na PubMed...